Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles and Patricia Rasmussen Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$186k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Youth Development$160kEducation$118kHealth$69kHousing & Shelter$48kArts & Culture$41kHuman Services$39kReligion$20kRecreation & Sports$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $108k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Grace Brethren School$50,000
Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society$30,000
Carousel Ranch$28,250
Single Mothers Outreach$25,000
Henry Mayo Hospital$15,000
SCV Scholarship Foundation$10,000
Boys Girls Club$6,800
Individual grant recipient$6,280
Stars and Stripes Foundation$5,000
Fillmore Girls Softball$2,000
Homes for Families$2,000
Congressional Medal of Honor Society$1,750
ALS Network$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Friends of Heart Park$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Single Mothers Outreach: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$419k · 21 repeat orgs$143k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
19

Total granted

$419k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
0%

Still filing today

29%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    CAROUSEL RANCH INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $114k · revenue +26%
  • SC
    Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society
    2× · 2024–2025 · $31k · revenue +4%
  • HF
    HOMES FOR FAMILIES
    4× · 2020–2025 · $27k · revenue +234%

Funded once

  • CM
    Congressional Medal of Honer Societ
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • SS
    Stars Stripes Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • TP
    THE PAINTED TURTLE
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Gabriel Valley Training Center Residential Facility

To provide residential and supportive services for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. To achieve this mission the organization has constructed three residential homes and a recreation building.

—
2
Sierra Vista Child & Family Services

Sierra Vista Child & Family Services (SVCFS) is a non-profit community based organization providing services for children, youth, adults, and families since 1972 to over 16,000 children and families yearly. The agency provides an extensive…

Human Services
3
Victor Community Support Services Inc

Victor's mission is "to be a catalyst for sustained improvement in the lives of those we touch." This mission is operationalized through a broad array of programs and services serving people of all ages. Our services are also provided to…

Health
4
California Vocations Inc

The organization provides residential and vocation support to persons with developmental disabilities.

Employment
5
Art & Creativity for Healing

To support emotional healing through art & creative expression for those living with pain, grief, fear or stress.

Arts & Culture
6
Domestic Violence Center of Santa Clarita Valley

PROVIDES COUNSELING SERVICES TO BATTERED WOMEN AND THEIR CHILDREN.The organization ceased operations December 31, 2017 and merged with the Child & Family Center.

—
7
Variety Childrens Charities of the Desert Tent 66

To deliver life-changing programs that give Coachella Valley children a better future.

Human Services
8
California Transportation Foundation

At California Transportation Foundation (CTF) our mission is simple. We recognize the best and brightest in our industry with our Annual CTF Transportation Awards program. We remember those who have given all in service to the people of…

—
9
Silicon Valley Independent Living Center

SVILC builds disability identity, culture, pride, creating opportunities for personal and community transformation, and partnering with others to ensure that civil and human rights are protected.

Human Services
10
San Fernando Valley Interfaith Council Inc

With compassion, collaboration and commitment to action, vic provides services and program that engage and enrich the lives of older adults, families, and youth through a lens of inclusion to strengthen diverse communities in the valley

Human Services
11
Valley Center for the Blind

To support, train, and employ people who are blind or low vision and increase their opportunities to lead an independent and fulfilling life.

Health
12
San Lorenzo Valley Mountain Community Theater
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Charitable Ventures of Orange County; the most unlike its peers is Beavers Charitable Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Grace Brethren School: $50,000 · OtherGrace Brethren SchoolHenry Mayo Hospital: $45,000 · OtherHenry Mayo HospitalBoys and Girls Club: $30,136 · OtherBoys and Girls ClubNewhall School District: $30,000 · OtherNewhall School DistrictHomes 4 Families: $21,000 · OtherHomes 4 FamiliesHenry Mayo Newhall Hospital Foundat: $21,000 · OtherHenry Mayo Newhall Hospital FoundatGrace Brethern Church of Simi Valle: $19,860 · OtherGrace Brethern Church of Simi ValleThe College of the Canyons Foundation: $14,450 · Other+33 more: $105,942 · Other+33 moreCAROUSEL RANCH INC: $113,883 · Youth DevelopmentCAROUSEL RANCH INCTHE PAINTED TURTLE: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentSanta Clarita Valley Historical Society: $31,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $100 · Arts & CultureHOMES FOR FAMILIES: $26,850 · Housing & ShelterSINGLE MOTHERS OUTREACH INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesSNAP SPORTS INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesBEAVERS CHARITABLE TRUST: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTriumph Foundation: $1,500 · PhilanthropySCVTV: $10,000 · Public Benefit
Other$337,388Youth Development$118,883Arts & Culture$31,100Housing & Shelter$26,850Human Services$26,000Philanthropy$11,500Public Benefit$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAROUSEL RANCH INC: $113,883 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetSanta Clarita Valley Historical Society: $31,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetHOMES FOR FAMILIES: $26,850 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetThe College of the Canyons Foundation: $14,450 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBEAVERS CHARITABLE TRUST: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSCVTV: $10,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetTriumph Foundation: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSNAP SPORTS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALS Network: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVictor Valley College Foundation: $667 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChild & Family Center: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAROUSEL RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds SINGLE MOTHERS OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds The College of the Canyons Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BEAVERS CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds SCVTV ↗
  • Who funds THE PAINTED TURTLE ↗
  • Who funds Fillmore Girls Softball Inc ↗
  • Who funds Triumph Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SNAP SPORTS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Henry Mayo Newhall FoundationCA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Henry Mayo Newhall Foundation · The Steve y Kim Foundation Co Steve y Kim President · Fanny & Svante Knistrom Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles and Patricia Rasmussen Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles and Patricia Rasmussen Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Charles and Patricia Rasmussen Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Charles and Patricia Rasmussen Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Charles and Patricia Rasmussen Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph