Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles and Frances Kempler Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$103kPhilanthropy$88kHuman Services$22kEducation$12kCivil Rights$10kRecreation & Sports$8kInternational$8kAnimals$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$487k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$7,750
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$5,535
ANN & ROBERT LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPIT$5,000
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$4,000
IDF$2,500
NAMI$2,000
THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS$1,000
NW UNIVERSITY FEINBERG SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$1,000
ACLU OF ILLINOIS$500
ILLINOIS COALTION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS$500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$500
OPERATION WALK CHICAGO$500
SPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS$350
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIIETY$250
NEW VOCATIONS RACEHORSE ADOPTION PR$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILD RESCUE COALITION: $100 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
OH
CT
CA
VA
MD
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$246k · 32 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +46% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
23

Total granted

$246k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+46%

Still filing today

47%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyAnimalsInternationalCivil RightsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +13%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    8× · 2018–2025 · $18k · revenue +94%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • Northwestern Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +41%
  • FT
    Face the Future Foundation
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue -69%
  • University of Chicagograduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
2
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
Stanley Manne Childrens Research Institute

Stanley manne children's research institute strives to generate new knowledge and advance the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric diseases.

Health
5
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
6
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
7
UChicago Research International

To engage in scientific research and educational activities throughout the world on behalf of and in conjunction with the university of chicago.

Health
8
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago

SRAlab is dedicated to providing the best patient outcomes through the highest-quality clinical care, translational research, scientific discovery and education.

Health
9
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
10
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
11
Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

The lustgarten foundation is the largest private funder of pancreatic cancer research in the world. see schedule o.the lustgarten foundation is boldly leading the way through hope and innovation, turning fear into action through education…

Human Services
12
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Justin Schroeder Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
24/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $63,100 · OtherNORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONALZHEIMER'S ASSOC GREATER IL CHAPT: $24,900 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOC GREATER IL CHAPTANN & ROBERT LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPIT: $20,500 · OtherANN & ROBERT LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITALZHEIMER'S ASSOC GREATER IL CHAPTER: $20,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOC GREATER IL CHAPTERNAMI: $12,000 · OtherNAMIAUSTIN D LUCAS SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $10,150 · OtherAUSTIN D LUCAS SCHOLARSHIP FUND+30 more: $23,296 · Other+30 moreSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $18,200 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITAL…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $13,060 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEA…CHICAGO COALITION FOR FAMILY BUILDING: $2,000 · HealthOperation Walk Chicago: $1,550 · Health+8 more: $5,225 · Health+8 moreJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $24,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNIT…SOARING EAGLE ACADEMY: $1,200 · PhilanthropyMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,700 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $2,250 · InternationalNorthwestern University: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $5,250 · Civil RightsILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS: $500 · Civil RightsUniversity of Chicago: $1,000 · EducationJustin Schroeder Memorial Foundation: $100 · Education
Other$173,946Health$40,035Philanthropy$25,700International$7,950Recreation & Sports$6,000Civil Rights$5,750Education$1,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $24,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $18,200 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $13,060 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,700 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $5,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO COALITION FOR FAMILY BUILDING: $2,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS: $1,686 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOperation Walk Chicago: $1,550 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSOARING EAGLE ACADEMY: $1,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $1,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFace the Future Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $975 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS OF ILLINOIS INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH EDUCATION CENTER OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOLIGO NATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BUDDY FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Anti-Cruelty Society: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD RESCUE COALITION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO COALITION FOR FAMILY BUILDING ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds Operation Walk Chicago ↗
  • Who funds SOARING EAGLE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds Face the Future Foundation ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS OF ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN12× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles and Frances Kempler Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles and Frances Kempler Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Child Rescue Coalition Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Florida Sheriffs Association Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charles and Frances Kempler’s filings →

More from the funding graph