Skip to content

New York · Private foundation

Chang K Park Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.2M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
11
Grants FY2025
14
Organizations funded FY2024
36%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$100,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$600,000
Organizations funded a year
11 to 14
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
7
Total assets, FY2025
$31M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 36% of the organizations Chang K Park Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 28% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $690k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureInternationalSocial ScienceCommunity ImprovementHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving11$2.2M36%
FY202414$2.5M36%
FY202312$2.1M25%
FY202213$1.8M23%
FY202112$1.1M8%
FY202013$1.2M38%
FY201911$1.4M9%
FY201812$1.6M0%
98% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$5.8MPublic Benefit$3.1MArts & Culture$2.9MInternational$2.7MFood & Nutrition$2.7MHealth$535kReligion$390kScience & Tech$300kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
MI
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
TN
DC
GA
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Union Theological Seminary$4,236,553818%
Common Cause Education Fund$2,457,276711%
Wnet$2,368,37060%
Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere Inc$2,137,00060%
Bread for the World Institute$1,025,00047%
Michigan Tech Fund$772,00042%
Himalayan Cataract Project Inc$600,00081%
Inequality Media$500,000510%
Catholic Academy of Bridgeport Inc$390,0007n/a
Village Health Works$390,00091%
Show all 20 grantees
All grantees of Chang K Park Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Union Theological Seminary$4,236,553818%
Common Cause Education Fund$2,457,276711%
Wnet$2,368,37060%
Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere Inc$2,137,00060%
Bread for the World Institute$1,025,00047%
Michigan Tech Fund$772,00042%
Himalayan Cataract Project Inc$600,00081%
Inequality Media$500,000510%
Catholic Academy of Bridgeport Inc$390,0007n/a
Village Health Works$390,00091%
American Promise Education Fund Inc$300,00018%
Demos a Network for Ideas and Action Ltd$230,00031%
Association of the Bar of the City of New York Fund Inc$230,00041%
Democracy Matters Institute Inc$109,950440%
Fullerton Presbyterian Church$50,0001n/a
Friends of Ubunye Inc$50,0001n/a
Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders New York City Inc$45,00020%
Eva's Village Inc$20,00010%
Alliance to End Hunger$20,00021%
The Foundation for City College$10,00010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 17 recipients with no EIN on record ($3.1M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Chang K Park Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 17 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnion Theological Seminary: $4,236,553 over 8y, 18% of budgetCommon Cause Education Fund: $2,457,276 over 7y, 11% of budgetWnet: $2,368,370 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere Inc: $2,137,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBread for the World Institute: $1,025,000 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetMichigan Tech Fund: $772,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetHimalayan Cataract Project Inc: $600,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetInequality Media: $500,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetVillage Health Works: $390,000 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetAmerican Promise Education Fund Inc: $300,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetDemos a Network for Ideas and Action Ltd: $230,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetAssociation of the Bar of the City of New York Fund Inc: $230,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetDemocracy Matters Institute Inc: $109,950 over 4y, 40% of budgetAlzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders New York City Inc: $45,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetEva's Village Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAlliance to End Hunger: $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetThe Foundation for City College: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 17.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ge Aerospace FoundationCT11.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ge Aerospace Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Chang K Park Foundation with peer funders

About Chang K Park Foundation

How much does Chang K Park Foundation give?
Chang K Park Foundation reported 11 grants totaling $2,180,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 11 and 14 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Chang K Park Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (31%), Public Benefit (16%), Arts & Culture (15%).
Who are Chang K Park Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Union Theological Seminary ($4.2M), Common Cause Education Fund ($2.5M), Wnet ($2.4M).
Does Chang K Park Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 36% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Chang K Park Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Chang K Park Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Ge Aerospace Foundation, Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc, National Philanthropic Trust.
Where is Chang K Park Foundation based?
Chang K Park Foundation is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chang K Park’s filings →

More from the funding graph