· Public charity
Central Wyoming Chapter of the American Petroleum Institute
Api's mission is to influence public policy in support of a strong, viable u.s.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 43% of CENTRAL WYOMING CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $16,100 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $169,367 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $153,267 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HUNTING WITH HEROS WYOMING | $6,000 |
| OLIVIA CALDWELL FOUNDATION | $5,100 |
| NATRONA COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 100% of Central Wyoming Chapter of the American Petroleum Institute’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in WY; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OCOLIVIA CALDWELL FOUNDATION INC6× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +353%
- NCNATRONA COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS INC6× · 2017–2024 · $31k · revenue +44%
- WFWYOMING FOOD FOR THOUGHT PROJECT4× · 2017–2020 · $30k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- UWUNITED WAY OF NATRONA COUNTYone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -17%
- OHOILFIELD HELPING HANDS INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +28%
- WRWyoming Rescue Missiongraduatedone grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +27%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
WYCRP is committed to supporting the safety, permanence, and well-being of children through systematic reviews, education, prevention, and early intervention efforts. As a federally mandated entity, the Citizen Review Panel evaluates the…
Help families and caregivers of those with Alzheimers and Dementia related illnesses care for their loved ones. Direct services provide: support, encouragement, access to community resources & techniques to help meet challenges of caring…
We provide family planning service to those individuals who ned and request such services. we serve a six county area in western wyoming.
To serve victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, child abuse and other crimes committted in big horn county, wyoming
None
The Wyoming Nonprofit Network represents the collective voice of the Wyoming charitable nonprofit sector and brings best practices, resources, and support to the nonprofit community.
Provide activities for low income children
To improve and enhance rural health services and promote healthier individuals and communities in wyoming.
Focus on individual and family identified priorities and strengths and success. collaborate by including community partner supports and resources families choose themselves so people can thrive. support people where they are. empower them…
To reduce the impact of cancer on wyoming residents diagnosed with cancer by providing non-medical, charitable financial assistance and by providing free education and screening opportunities to residents not diagnosed with cancer.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make a Wish Foundation of Wyoming and the most unlike its peers is E Plus Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MERCER FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds OLIVIA CALDWELL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NATRONA COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds WYOMING FOOD FOR THOUGHT PROJECT ↗
- Who funds JASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL WYOMING HOSPICE & TRANSITIONS ↗
- Who funds MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION OF WYOMING ↗
- Who funds Special Olympics Wyoming Inc ↗
- Who funds HUNTING WITH HEROES INC ↗
- Who funds NATRONA COLLECTIVE HEALTH TRUST ↗
- Who funds CASA of Natrona County ↗
- Who funds Childrens Advocacy Project ↗
- Who funds Arc of Natrona County ↗
- Who funds MOTHER SETON HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds Self Help Center Inc ↗
- Who funds RENEWED HOPE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF WYOMING ↗
- Who funds GREATER WYOMING BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NATRONA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds WYOMING FAMILIES FOR HANDS & VOICES ↗
- Who funds OILFIELD HELPING HANDS INC ↗
- Who funds Wyoming Rescue Mission ↗
- Who funds Child Development Center of Natrona County ↗
- Who funds KOREIN SHRINERS ↗
- Who funds THE SCIENCE ZONE ↗
- Who funds CASPER FAMILY CONNECTIONS ↗
- Who funds YOUTH FOR CHRIST USA INC CASPER YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Natrona Collective Health Trust · The McMurry Foundation · Wyoming Community Foundation · Wold Foundation · Zimmerman Family Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Two Fly Foundation Inc · Skelton Myra F Foundation · United Way of Natrona County · Double 4 Foundation · The John P Ellbogen Foundation · Tw Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Central Wyoming Chapter of the American Petroleum Institute funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.