· Private foundation
Cecile C Craig Charitable Test Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 87% of CECILE C CRAIG CHARITABLE TEST TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $10,000 |
| WEST ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC | $5,000 |
| PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME | $5,000 |
| COMMUNITY SOUP BOWL | $5,000 |
| FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE | $4,000 |
| TUSCALOOSA CHILDRENS CENTER INC | $2,500 |
| SAMARITAN CLINIC | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CSCOMMUNITY SOUP BOWL INC6× · 2020–2025 · $31k · revenue +61%
- PHPRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN3× · 2020–2024 · $17k · revenue +12%
- HTHISTORIC TUSCALOOSA INC4× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +43%
Funded once
- FOFRIENDS OF HISTORIC NORTHPORTone grant, 2022 · $5k
- EWEAGLES' WINGS INCone grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%
- FCFAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE OF WEST ALABAM A INCone grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue -5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To feed people in need today and foster collaborative solutions to end hunger tomorrow.
Providing shelter and food for the homeless, unwanted animals in tunica county, providing medical attention needed, spay and neuter all animals taken in and finding homes for them. assist needy citizens with food for their animals.
Habitat for humanity of baldwin county, inc. is an ecumenical, christian housing ministry that seeks to eliminate poverty housing by partnering with the community to make decent shelter a matter of conscience and action.
To helpless less fortunate families to build homes
The organization pledges to provide quality programs, service, and technology to meet the unique physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of the terminally ill and their families, and to educate the community about end of life issues.
Provide housing for the needy
Homeless shelter
The organization builds homes for low income families.
To nourish northwest arkansas communities by feeding hungry people through partnerships with other hunger relief organizations.
Dedicated to strengthening our community by reducing hunger and promoting self-sufficiency.
Construction of Residential Housing for Low-income families
The organizations purpose is to provide services to individuals for the prevention and treatment of child abuse and neglect.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Presbyterian Home for Children and the most unlike its peers is West Alabama Food Bank Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY SOUP BOWL INC ↗
- Who funds WEST ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds THE TUSCALOOSA CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds HISTORIC TUSCALOOSA INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF HISTORIC NORTHPORT ↗
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES ↗
- Who funds EAGLES' WINGS INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE OF WEST ALABAM A INC ↗
- Who funds TUSCALOOSA CHILDREN'S THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Reese Phifer Jr Memorial Attn Susan Cork · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The James I Harrison Family Foundation · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Se Belcher Jr Private Foundation #3 · Holle Family Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cecile C Craig Charitable Test Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.