Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cdm Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$317k
Granted FY2025still arriving
90
Grants FY2025still arriving
20
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$238kEnvironment$235kReligion$204kEducation$182kHuman Services$149kArts & Culture$114kInternational$94kCivil Rights$88kOther$0
02FY2025 · 90 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k82 grants · $205k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $113k
$2,000
Median grant
20
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$23,000
NEW COMMUNITY VISION$22,000
MEDLEND ORG$14,000
LEELANAU CONSERVANCY$13,500
SOCIAL JUSTICE FUND NORTHWEST$10,000
CHINOOK FUND$10,000
THOUSAND CURRENTS$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
MCLAREN NORTHERN MI HOSPITAL$9,000
THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL$9,000
MCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN$8,000
KENILWORTH UNION CHURCH$7,250
SCRIPPS HEALTH FOUNDATION$6,000
LITTLE TRAVERSE CONSERVANCY$5,500
ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $113k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 20%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $2k → 7%Mercy Chefs: $1k → 20%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 20%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 20%ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $5k → 11%ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $5k → 11%ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $5k → 11%PENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 7%Peninsula Family Service: $5k → 7%ELDERSHELF OF SAN DIEGO: $5k → 11%PENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 7%PENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 7%ELDERSHELF OF SAN DIEGO: $5k → 11%PENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 7%PENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 7%HOPE FOR FAMILIES CENTER: $3k → 12%HOPE FOR FAMILIES CENTER: $2k → 12%Hope For Families Center: $2k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%HOPE FOR FAMILIES CENTER: $2k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%HOPE FOR FAMILIES CENTER: $2k → 12%American Red Cross: $1k → 14%HOPE FOR FAMILIES CENTER: $2k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION: $2k → 12%SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION: $2k → 12%SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION: $2k → 12%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $3k → 14%Senior Resource Association: $2k → 12%SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION: $2k → 12%SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION: $2k → 12%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $3k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $3k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICE: $4k → 14%GREENLIGHT FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 14%Greenlight Family Services: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
WA
MT
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
NC
SC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 116 repeat orgs$122k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

116 repeat relationships: 77 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

116
36

Total granted

$1.7M
$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
0%

Still filing today

57%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentInternationalArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL
    6× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +57%
  • CF
    CHINOOK FUND INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $47k · revenue +8%
  • MB
    MCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $42k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • FO
    Friends Of Riverside (Anne)
    one grant, 2022 · $9k
  • SC
    SEED COMMONS WORKERS RESPONSE FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • AH
    Adventist Health St Helena Fdtn
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
6
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
7
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
10
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
11
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
12
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Diego Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Bissell Pet Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

87 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 87 of the 166 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
87/87
Grantees still filing
61/87
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $137,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $52,500 · OtherMclaren Northern Mi Hospital: $43,000 · OtherNEW COMMUNITY VISION: $41,000 · OtherSocial Justice: $37,500 · OtherMEDLEND: $37,000 · Other+103 more: $747,050 · Other+103 moreLEELANAU CONSERVANCY: $75,000 · EnvironmentLEELANAU CON…MCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $41,500 · EnvironmentMCKEE BOTANI…LAKE FOREST OPEN LANDS ASSOCIATION: $39,700 · EnvironmentLAKE FOREST …Little Traverse Conservancy Inc: $15,000 · EnvironmentLittle Trave…FRIENDS OF ILLINOIS NATURE PRESERVES: $7,600 · EnvironmentCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $6,950 · Environment+3 more: $7,500 · EnvironmentTHE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL: $50,000 · EducationTHE HOTCH…Lake Champlain Waldorf School: $26,000 · EducationLake Cham…DANA HALL SCHOOL: $20,000 · EducationDANA HALL…THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $19,000 · EducationTHE TRUST…Davidson College: $13,000 · EducationDavidson …University of Chicago: $6,000 · EducationWilliams College: $6,000 · Education+7 more: $19,750 · Education+7 morePENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE: $30,000 · Human ServicesELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $24,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOPE FOR FAMILIES CENTER INC: $10,500 · Human ServicesSenior Resource Association Inc: $9,250 · Human ServicesMetropolitan Family Services: $9,000 · Human ServicesInspiration Corporation: $9,000 · Human ServicesMETROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $7,000 · Human Services+5 more: $9,000 · Human ServicesTHOUSAND CURRENTS: $55,000 · InternationalGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $15,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,000 · InternationalTECHNOSERVE INC: $3,000 · InternationalHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC: $3,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF: $3,000 · InternationalGOOD360: $3,000 · International+2 more: $3,000 · InternationalMEDLENDORG: $36,000 · HealthSCRIPPS HEALTH: $19,000 · HealthSt Helena Hospital Foundation: $10,000 · HealthLUMINARIES INC: $9,250 · HealthRush University Medical Center: $6,000 · HealthEndeavor Health Clinical Operations: $3,000 · Health+1 more: $2,000 · HealthCHINOOK FUND INC: $47,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $12,000 · PhilanthropyTHE LAKE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $11,500 · PhilanthropyBISSELL Pet Foundation: $6,950 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC: $3,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,095,550Environment$193,250Education$159,750Human Services$116,750International$89,000Health$85,250Philanthropy$80,450

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLEELANAU CONSERVANCY: $75,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetTHOUSAND CURRENTS: $55,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL: $50,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHINOOK FUND INC: $47,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetMCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $41,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetLAKE FOREST OPEN LANDS ASSOCIATION: $39,700 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMEDLENDORG: $36,000 over 3y, 31% of budgetPENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST GERMAINE CHILDREN'S CHARITY: $29,000 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetLake Champlain Waldorf School: $26,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $24,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetRIVERSIDE THEATRE INC: $21,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDANA HALL SCHOOL: $20,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $19,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC: $19,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSCRIPPS HEALTH: $19,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetChildren of Shelters: $15,800 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS: $14,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDavidson College: $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBALLET VERO BEACH INC: $12,500 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Religions: $12,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR ENRICHED LIVING INC: $12,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LAKE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $11,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOPE FOR FAMILIES CENTER INC: $10,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSt Helena Hospital Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLUMINARIES INC: $9,250 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetSenior Resource Association Inc: $9,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMetropolitan Family Services: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInspiration Corporation: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF ILLINOIS NATURE PRESERVES: $7,600 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetDUKE SCHOOL: $7,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $6,950 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBISSELL Pet Foundation: $6,950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLEELANAU CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE ART LEAGUE: $6,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetWilliams College: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGLEN ARBOR ARTS CENTER: $5,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEELANAU CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THOUSAND CURRENTS ↗
  • Who funds THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CHINOOK FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKE FOREST OPEN LANDS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDLENDORG ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds ST GERMAINE CHILDREN'S CHARITY ↗
  • Who funds Lake Champlain Waldorf School ↗
  • Who funds ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds RIVERSIDE THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds DANA HALL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC ↗
  • Who funds SCRIPPS HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Children of Shelters ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Little Traverse Conservancy Inc ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
  • Who funds Davidson College ↗
  • Who funds BALLET VERO BEACH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA17.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Indian River Community Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · John's Island Community Service League Inc · The Lilly Christy Busch Hermann Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Grand Traverse Regional Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cdm Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cdm Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Trustees of the Smith College: 1% of income from government
  • Lake Champlain Waldorf School: 1% of income from government
  • Ballet Vero Beach Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The Learning Alliance Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Cdm Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Cdm Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 166 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cdm’s filings →

More from the funding graph