Skip to content
Catawba Area Coalition for the Homeless at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Catawba Area Coalition for the Homeless

To provide strategic support through innovation, collaboration, education, and advocacy among community partners so that they may effectively and efficiently serve those who are experiencing and/or at risk of becoming unhoused.

$673k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$136k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$659kCrime & Legal$11k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $418,050, the rows itemized in this filing. The $673,270 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $255,220 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $87k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $331k
$25,600
Median grant
1
States reached
$594k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BETHEL SHELTERS$135,600
THE LIFE HOUSE WOMEN'S SHELTER$135,600
FACES & VOICES OF RECOVERY - TRI-CO$60,000
YORK COUNTY COUNCIL ON ALCOHOL & DR$25,600
THE HAVEN MEN'S SHELTER$25,000
AFFINITY HEALTH CENTER$25,000
SC LEGAL SERVICES$11,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $313k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BETHEL SHELTERS: $136k → 8%BETHEL SHELTERS: $85k → 8%FAMILY PROMISE OF YORK COUNTY: $8k → 8%FACES & VOICES OF RECOVERY - TRI-CO: $60k → 8%FACES & VOICES OF RECOVERY - TRI-CO: $25k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$626k · 5 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
1

Total granted

$626k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-12%
+100%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BETHEL SHELTERS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $221k · revenue -12%
  • TL
    The Life House Women's Shelter Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $220k · revenue -43%
  • FA
    FACES AND VOICES OF RECOVERY TRI-COUNTY INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $85k · revenue -27%

Funded once

  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF YORK COUNTYINCgraduated
    2× · 2023–2024 · $8k · revenue +100%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cleveland County Abuse Prevention Council Inc

The Abuse Prevention Council provides emergency, advocacy, counseling, education and specialized services for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and homeless individuals and families.

Crime & Legal
2
Shalom House Ministries Inc

Shalom House Ministries Inc operates a treatment center for women struggling with drug and alcohol addition. It also offers transitional dwelling for women who need a safe place after treatment.

Health
3
House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

—
4
Southlight Healthcare Inc

Southlight healthcare provides access to high-quality mental health and substance use treatment, fostering a resilient community by supporting individuals in their recovery.

Health
5
Favor House Ministries Inc

To provide temporary housing for substance abusers

Health
6
Shelter House Community Shelter and Transition Services

Through shelter and housing, advocacy and supportive services, our mission is to prevent and end homelessness in our community.

—
7
Home for Homeless Women
—
8
The Hope Center Inc

Our mission is to provide comprehensive life-sustaining and life-rebuilding services that promote healing from substance use disorder, mental health disorders, and homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
9
My Sister's House Inc

My Sister's House is a nonprofit organization that provides services, programs, and resources to empower victims of domestic violence and their children to be free from abuse.

Human Services
10
The Haven of Transylvania County

To bridge the gap between homelessness and permanent housing for both families and individuals. We are dedicated to providing a safe, transitional shelter, along with essential services, to empower those in need and pave the way toward…

Human Services
11
Ruths House

Provide a community owned and operated shelter for a safe haven from domestic violence for women and their children in beaufort county, nc. provide counseling and guidance to allow these women to make decisions about their future.

Crime & Legal
12
Safe Harbour Inc

Safe harbour provides a continuum of housing and supportive services for homeless and nearly homeless individuals and families in our communities.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bethel Shelters; the most unlike its peers is The Haven Men's Shelter. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BETHEL SHELTERS: $220,600 · Human ServicesBETHEL SHELTERSFACES AND VOICES OF RECOVERY TRI-COUNTY INC: $85,000 · Human ServicesFACES AND VOICES OF RECOVERY TRI-COUNTY INC+1 more: $7,800 · Human ServicesThe Life House Women's Shelter Inc: $219,600 · Housing & ShelterThe Life House Women's Shelter IncTHE HAVEN MEN'S SHELTER: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE HAVEN MEN'S SHELTERYork County Council on Alcohol and Drug Abuse Inc: $50,600 · OtherAffinity Health Center: $50,000 · HealthSouth Carolina Legal Services: $11,250 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$313,400Housing & Shelter$244,600Other$50,600Health$50,000Crime & Legal$11,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBETHEL SHELTERS: $220,600 over 2y, 13% of budgetThe Life House Women's Shelter Inc: $219,600 over 3y, 15% of budgetFACES AND VOICES OF RECOVERY TRI-COUNTY INC: $85,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetYork County Council on Alcohol and Drug Abuse Inc: $50,600 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAffinity Health Center: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HAVEN MEN'S SHELTER: $25,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF YORK COUNTYINC: $7,800 over 2y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Springs Close Fou…Community Partnership…Comporium Foundation …Foundation for the Ca…Duke Energy FoundationThe Junior Welfare Le…United Way of York Co…York Electric Trust I…The Bank of America C…Natl Christian Charit…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Springs Close Foundation IncSC17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Springs Close Foundation Inc · Community Partnership Foundation · Comporium Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke Energy Foundation · The Junior Welfare League Inc · United Way of York County SC · York Electric Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Catawba Area Coalition for the Homeless funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Catawba Area Coalition for the Homeless. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Catawba Area Coalition for the Homeless’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home