Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Junior Welfare League Inc

The Junior Welfare League, Inc.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$49k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$124kEducation$115kRecreation & Sports$105kHuman Services$51kHousing & Shelter$40kFood & Nutrition$29kYouth Development$6kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $2k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $49k
$1,300
Median grant
1
States reached
$198k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Nothing Pink$49,034
Fort Mill Care Center$1,300
Foundation for Rock Hill Schools$433
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Pilgrim's Inn: $25k → 8%York County Council on Aging: $12k → 8%Bethel's Men Shelter: $4k → 8%Pilgrim's Inn: $4k → 8%YMCA: $3k → 8%HOPE Inc: $1k → 8%Family Promise of York County: $200 → 8%Fort Mill Care Center: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

17%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$81k · 5 repeat orgs$399k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +82% since the first grant, against +43% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
27

Total granted

$81k
$348k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+43%

Still filing today

80%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YC
    YORK COUNTY FIRST STEPS TO SCHOOL READINESS PARTNERSHIP
    2× · 2018–2022 · $45k · revenue +126%
  • PI
    PILGRIMS INN INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $29k · revenue +54%
  • DD
    Dorothy Day Soup Kitchen
    2× · 2019–2021 · $3k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • RH
    ROCK HILL SPORTS COMMISSIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $82k · revenue +274%
  • JL
    Jeffrey Lee Williams Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $58k · revenue -95% · 87% of their budget
  • RA
    Ride Ability
    one grant, 2024 · $42k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carolina Teen Center

Carolina Teen Center is a prevention and education year-round after-school and summer program that services youth and their families. Literacy programs, tutoring, life skills, mentoring, positive peer groups, conflict resolution skills,…

Health
2
House of Hope North Charleston

To reduce hunger and poverty in the Tri-County Area by providing individuals and families with food, clothing, shelter, resource and spiritual support while striving to employ, educate and empower.

Food & Nutrition
3
Southlight Healthcare Inc

Southlight healthcare provides access to high-quality mental health and substance use treatment, fostering a resilient community by supporting individuals in their recovery.

Health
4
Cleveland County Abuse Prevention Council Inc

The Abuse Prevention Council provides emergency, advocacy, counseling, education and specialized services for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and homeless individuals and families.

Crime & Legal
5
Youth Crisis Center Inc

The mission of YCC is to build a healthier community by empowering young people and families to rise above adversity.

Human Services
6
The Young Women's Christian Association of Yonkers

Ywca is dedicated to empowering women and promoting peace, health, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

7
Life Choice Pregnancy Center of Western North Carolina

Choosing Life over Abortion

Human Services
8
Ruths House

Provide a community owned and operated shelter for a safe haven from domestic violence for women and their children in beaufort county, nc. provide counseling and guidance to allow these women to make decisions about their future.

Crime & Legal
9
Community Care

To provide quality community-based services that are timely and effective in promoting the health and well being of individuals and their families.

Human Services
10
Young Women's Christian Association of Rochester and Monroe County

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

Human Services
11
C4 Ministries of Laurens County

General assistance to help families experiencing homelessness and low-income families achieve sustaiinable independence through a community-based response.

Human Services
12
House of Hope

We assist young mothers with housing and wrap around services.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Attention Home Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rock Hill Sports Commission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Development & WellnessEmergency Shelter & Basic N…Charter Schools & School Su…Community Service Organizat…Community Development Organ…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Jeffrey Lee Williams Foundation — $57,683 · OtherJeffrey Lee Williams FoundationRide Ability — $42,454 · OtherRide AbilityProject Hope — $23,045 · OtherProject HopeRock Hill School District Foundation Inc — $23,045 · OtherRock Hill School District Foundation IncRock Hill Parks & Recreation — $20,000 · OtherRock Hill Parks & Recreation+16 more — $38,940 · Other+16 moreROCK HILL SPORTS COMMISSION — $82,154 · Community ImprovementROCK HILL SPORTS CO…NOTHING PINK INC — $49,034 · HealthNOTHING PINK…PALMETTO WOMEN'S CENTER — $5,000 · HealthPALMETTO WOM…PILGRIMS INN INC — $28,555 · Human ServicesPILGRIMS IN…YORK COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC — $12,497 · Human ServicesYORK COUNTY…BETHEL SHELTERS — $4,000 · Human ServicesBETHEL SHEL…UPPER PALMETTO YMCA INC — $2,500 · Human Services+3 more — $2,500 · Human ServicesYORK COUNTY FIRST STEPS TO SCHOOL READINESS PARTNERSHIP — $44,992 · EducationYORK COUNTY…THE PALMETTO SCHOOL — $3,852 · EducationTHE PALMETT…The Life House Women's Shelter Inc — $34,571 · Housing & ShelterLake Wylie Childrens Charity — $5,025 · Philanthropy
Other$205,167Community Improvement$82,154Health$54,034Human Services$50,052Education$48,844Housing & Shelter$34,571Philanthropy$5,025

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJeffrey Lee Williams Foundation — $57,683 over 1y, 87% of budgetNOTHING PINK INC — $49,034 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetYORK COUNTY FIRST STEPS TO SCHOOL READINESS PARTNERSHIP — $44,992 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetThe Life House Women's Shelter Inc — $34,571 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetPILGRIMS INN INC — $28,555 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetRock Hill School District Foundation Inc — $23,045 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetYORK COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC — $12,497 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLake Wylie Childrens Charity — $5,025 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S ATTENTION HOME INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBETHEL SHELTERS — $4,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SALUDA COUNSELING SERVICES CENTER INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE PALMETTO SCHOOL — $3,852 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCAROLINA COMMUNITY CARE INC — $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDorothy Day Soup Kitchen — $3,280 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetUPPER PALMETTO YMCA INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBright Side Youth Ranch Inc — $1,610 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSAFE PASSAGE INC — $1,471 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHope Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of York County Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF YORK COUNTYINC — $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYork County Council on Alcohol and Drug Abuse Inc — $170 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Comporium Foundation IncSC38.9× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Comporium Foundation Inc · Community Partnership Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · York Electric Trust Inc · The Springs Close Foundation Inc · United Way of York County SC · Duke Energy Foundation · Nutramax Family Foundation · The JEM Project · South Carolina Christian Foundation · United Way of Chester County In · True Homes Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Junior Welfare League Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph