How much did Community Partnership Foundation grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 60% of Community Partnership Foundation’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2021

offeringagebusinessconnectillness

2022

findmentorshipperformanceinnovativehungerphysicalspaces

2023

houremergencyfuturepositiveadultsadvocacyhomeless

2024

healingsurroundingencouragepersonalmental healthpoverty homelessnesspositive

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k29 grants · $73k
$10k–50k1 grant · $10k

$2,500

Median grant

States reached

$87k

Total assets

Largest grants

THE MANNA HOUSE PANTRY$10,000
PALMETTO COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE$9,000
BETHEL SHELTERS$6,500
DEFEND THE FATHERLESS$4,500
LIV TO GRO INC$3,500
ROCK HILL SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION$3,500
UNITED WAY OF YORK COUNTY$3,000
ROCK HILL KAPPA FOUNDATION$3,000
ABOVE & BEYOND TUTORING$2,750
BRIGHT SIDE YOUTH RANCH$2,500
THERAPY RESOURCE GROUP$2,500
LOVE N CHERISH FAMILY CENTER$2,500
THE HAVEN MEN'S SHELTER$2,500
THE LIFE HOUSE WOMEN'S SHELTER$2,500
CHASE HUECHTKER FOUNDATION CHASING THE WAKE$2,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of Community Partnership Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in SC; read by stated purpose it is 85% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Community Partnership Foundationlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address · 8.3% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$178k · 27 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +118% since the first grant, against +51% for the ones you funded once.

27 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$178k

$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+118%

+51%

Still filing today

52%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionHealthEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TM
THE MANNA HOUSE PANTRY
2× · 2022–2024 · $12k · revenue +1%
CA
CHILDREN'S ATTENTION HOME
3× · 2022–2024 · $11k · revenue +19%
PI
PILGRIM'S INN
2× · 2022–2023 · $8k · revenue +134%

Funded once

TH
TENDER HEARTS MINISTRIES
one grant, 2022 · $11k
OO
OMEGAS OF ROCK HILL INC
one grant, 2022 · $11k
BE
BLACK ECONOMIC LEADERSHIP LEAGUE OF ROCK HILL
one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -83% · 32% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Sunshine for Humanity Inc

Homeless Shelter

Health

House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

—

People Help Exchange Inc

Food Pantry to combat hunger and prevent homelessness.

Public Safety & Disaster

Palmetto Womens Center

We promote life by offering gospel centered care and counseling, excellence in medical care, and focused education and resources so that abortion would become unthinkable. We do this by offering free services that include counseling,…

Health

Holy Rock Outreach Ministeries Inc

The mission of Holy Rock Outreach Ministries, Inc. is to provide a comprehensive social services approach that will promote renewed hope and restoration to a families in crisis.

—

Hope Shop

Provide food and necessities to those in need.

Food & Nutrition

Ruths House

Provide a community owned and operated shelter for a safe haven from domestic violence for women and their children in beaufort county, nc. provide counseling and guidance to allow these women to make decisions about their future.

Crime & Legal

Samaritan House Inc

Samaritan House provides a place where homeless inividuals can stay to recover from surgery or other illnesses. All homless individuals are referred to Samaritan house from any one of the Charlotte area hospitals.

Housing & Shelter

Hope House Rescue Mission Inc

Hope house rescue mission strives to eliminate homelessness. our mission is "to break the cycle of poverty and despair... one life at a time." we provide physical, emotional, mental and spiritual resources regardless of race, religion or…

Human Services

Point Care Center

Since February of 2014, we have supplies grocerty items to many families in need. In the time we have been open we have served over 10500 families and over 31000 family members. We currently have four pantry locations that include two in…

Religion

Home for Homeless Women

—

New Hope Shelter

Provide homeless with individualized support services and tailored housing solutions with a goal of obtaining and maintaining affordable housing.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of York Countyinc and the most unlike its peers is Therapy Resource Group. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 12. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 15% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/34

the rest of the field

12%

155/1,263

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

27/27

Grantees still filing

22/27

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$163,678Human Services$38,500Food & Nutrition$20,000Education$14,214Housing & Shelter$12,500Health$10,750Community Improvement$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Springs Close Foundation IncSC37.6× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Springs Close Foundation Inc · Comporium Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · United Way of York County SC · Duke Energy Foundation · York Electric Trust Inc · South Carolina Christian Foundation · The Junior Welfare League Inc · The Jem Project · True Homes Foundation Inc · Dennis and Deborah Getter · The US Charitable Gift Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Community Partnership Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BLACK ECONOMIC LEADERSHIP LEAGUE OF ROCK HILL.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 832875456 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on BLACK ECONOMIC LEADERSHIP LEAGUE OF ROCK HILL, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 32% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Community Partnership Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Community Partnership Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Community Partnership Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Community Partnership Foundation?

More from the funding graph

Community Partnership Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Community Partnership Foundation?

More from the funding graph