Skip to content

· Private foundation

Caspe Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$52k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$214kReligion$58kHealth$43kArts & Culture$41kHuman Services$23kRecreation & Sports$20kPhilanthropy$20kInternational$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OAKWOOD SCHOOL$15,000
THE SPINE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION$10,000
BRENTWOOD SCHOOL$7,870
WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLE$4,780
CONGREGATION BETH SHOLOM$3,250
SOLOMON SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL OF BERGEN COUNTY$3,000
CAMP RAMAH IN THE BERKSHIRES$2,500
MUSEUM OF TOLERANCE$1,800
JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY$1,250
Individual grant recipient$500
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER$500
BROTHERS FOR LIFE$500
Individual grant recipient$500
CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION$160
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $35 → 11%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $50 → 12%VETERANS RELIEF NETWORK: $50 → 15%SILVERLAKE INDEPENDENT JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MO
VA
SC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$364k · 19 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
21

Total granted

$364k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+2%

Still filing today

58%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    OTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN
    2× · 2018–2019 · $30k · revenue +39%
  • TS
    THE SPINE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2024 · $25k · revenue +238%
  • OS
    OAKWOOD SCHOOL
    3× · 2021–2024 · $25k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • CP
    CBZ PERPETUAL CARE FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • LS
    LYNN SAGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -52%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TEL AVIV
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
2
Irvine Hebrew Day School

Ihds utilizes a dual general and judaic studies curriculum. the judaic studies curriculum emphasizes the fundamentals of hebrew reading, writing and speaking, jewish history, holidays, jewish values, torah, the jewish life cycle, the land…

—
3
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
4
Abraham Joshua Heschel Day School

Abraham joshua heschel day school cultivates students' natural sense of wonder into an exceptionally rich education that encourages critical thinking, creativity, and compassion. in partnership with our families, we inspire our students to…

—
5
Shalom School

Shalom school's mission is to provide each child with an outstanding education in a nurturing environment that is academically excellent, inclusive, innovative, and inspired by jewish values and traditions.

—
6
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
7
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
8
Fuchs Mizrachi Schools

The mission of fuchs mizrachi school is to educate each child in the orthodox jewish religious zionist tradition, imbued with the love of g-d, torah, people and the land of israel.

—
9
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
10
Yavneh Day School

Yavneh day school provides strong academic excellence in general and judaic studies within a strong community where each child is celebrated and challenged.

Education
11
Brandeis School of San Francisco

The brandeis school of san francisco inspires students to lead lives of learning and purpose. we provide a challenging academic environment and a welcoming, inclusive community, each deeply enriched by jewish thought, values, and…

Education
12
The Seven Hills School

The institution provides educational instruction and activities to students ranging from preschool through 8th grade.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Early Education; the most unlike its peers is The Spine Institute Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/24
Grantees still filing
13/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION: $117,660 · EducationTHE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATIONOTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN: $30,000 · EducationOTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGNOAKWOOD SCHOOL: $25,000 · EducationOAKWOOD SCHOOLBRENTWOOD SCHOOL: $12,870 · EducationBRENTWOOD SCHOOL+2 more: $2,500 · EducationTEMPLE ISAIAH: $23,951 · OtherTEMPLE ISAIAHTHE SOLOMON SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL OF BERGEN COUNTY: $23,500 · OtherTHE SOLOMON SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL OF BERGEN…CBZ PERPETUAL CARE FUND: $20,000 · OtherCBZ PERPETUAL CARE FUNDCONGREGATION BETH SHALOM: $12,500 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH SHALOMCAMP RAMAH IN BERKSHIRES: $10,000 · OtherCAMP RAMAH IN BERKSHIRESCAMP RAMAH IN THE BERKSHIRES INC: $10,000 · OtherCAMP RAMAH IN THE BERKSHIRES INCCONGREGATION OF BETH SHOLOM: $10,000 · OtherCONGREGATION OF BETH SHOLOMLYNN SAGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherLYNN SAGE FOUNDATIONWILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLE: $9,370 · OtherWILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLEKATHY WILSON FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Other+17 more: $24,342 · Other+17 moreTHE CONTEMPORARY JEWISH MUSEUM: $40,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CONTEMP…SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $1,800 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $699 · Arts & CultureTHE SPINE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthJEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $6,500 · PhilanthropyPABLOVE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropySILVERLAKE INDEPENDENT JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $1,000 · Human ServicesKIDS WISH NETWORK INC: $85 · Human ServicesVETERANS RELIEF NETWORK INC: $50 · Human ServicesWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,000 · International
Education$188,030Other$161,663Arts & Culture$42,499Health$26,500Philanthropy$7,500Human Services$1,135International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION: $117,660 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CONTEMPORARY JEWISH MUSEUM: $40,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SPINE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetOAKWOOD SCHOOL: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOLOMON SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL OF BERGEN COUNTY: $23,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBRENTWOOD SCHOOL: $12,870 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN THE BERKSHIRES INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $6,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetABRAHAM JOSHUA HESCHEL SCHOOL: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSILVERLAKE INDEPENDENT JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPABLOVE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBrothers for Life: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMission High Foundation: $500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCHILDHOOD LEUKEMIA FOUNDATION INC: $135 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS WISH NETWORK INC: $85 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS RELIEF NETWORK INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIREFIGHTERS SUPPORT FOUNDATION INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CONTEMPORARY JEWISH MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds OTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN ↗
  • Who funds THE SPINE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OAKWOOD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE SOLOMON SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL OF BERGEN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds BRENTWOOD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN THE BERKSHIRES INC ↗
  • Who funds LYNN SAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC ↗
  • Who funds ABRAHAM JOSHUA HESCHEL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SILVERLAKE INDEPENDENT JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds PABLOVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Brothers for Life ↗
  • Who funds Mission High Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM ASSOCIATES ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHOOD LEUKEMIA FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA18.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jewish Federation Council of Greater La · Fjc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Caspe Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Caspe Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Caspe’s filings →

    More from the funding graph