Skip to content

· Private foundation

Carter Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$37k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$112kScience & Tech$43kHuman Services$42kHealth$20kAnimals$18kArts & Culture$15kHousing & Shelter$10kYouth Development$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$209k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION$10,000
BOOTSTRAPS ESBI FOUNDATION$5,000
STEM GENERATION$4,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DENVER$2,500
RESILIENCE 1220$2,250
DENVER KIDS INC$1,500
MOUNT EVANS HOME HEALTH & HOSPICE$1,000
MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION$1,000
FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES$1,000
DENVER RESCUE MISSION$1,000
COLORADO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS$1,000
MOUNTAIN RESOURCE CENTER$1,000
CENTER FOR THE ARTS EVERGREEN$1,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$750
ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LOS CABOS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%KAWEAH DELTA HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $500 → 18%ADOPTION EXCHANGE: $500 → 8%THE ADOPTION EXCHANGE: $500 → 8%EVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH: $1k → 7%THE ADOPTION EXCHANGE: $500 → 8%RAISE THE FUTURE: $500 → 12%RAISE THE FUTURE: $500 → 12%RAISE THE FUTURE: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
NV
NJ
CA
CO
VA
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$266k · 42 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

42 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
25

Total granted

$266k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+57%

Still filing today

52%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesAnimalsArts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $60k · revenue +79%
  • CF
    Center for the Arts Evergreen Inc
    4× · 2021–2025 · $11k · revenue +27%
  • MA
    MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +39%
  • LC
    Los Cabos Children's Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +57%
  • CH
    CASA HOGAR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
2
Public Broadcasting of Colorado Inc

To deliver meaningful news, music, and cultural experiences to everyone in colorado using the power of the human voice in all its forms

Arts & Culture
3
The Denver Foundation

To inspire people and mobilize resources to strengthen our community.

Philanthropy
4
Colorado State University Foundation

See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…

Education
5
University of Denver

The university of denver (du) is a higher educational institution, providing both undergraduate and graduate degrees - the mission of the university of denver is to promote learning by engaging with students (continued on schedule o)in…

Education
6
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

—
7
Colorado Open Lands

Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.

Environment
8
Colo Foundation for Water Education

Water education colorado ensures coloradans are informed on water issues and equipped to make decisions that guide our state to a sustainable water future.

Environment
9
Colorado Bar Association

To advance the science of jurisprudence, secure the more efficient administration of justice, encourage the adoption of proper legislation, advocate thorough and continuing legal education, uphold the honor and integrity of the bar,…

—
10
Denver Metro Convention & Visitors Bureau

To bring conventions and leisure visitors to denver for the economic benefit of the city, the community, and our partners.

—
11
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
12
Kipp Colorado Schools

Kipp colorado's mission is to equip our students with the academic skills and character strengths necessary to succeed in college and careers.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Women's Foundation of Colorado Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dallas Fallen Officer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/39
Grantees still filing
32/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOOTSTRAPS ESBI FOUNDATION: $40,750 · OtherBOOTSTRAPS ESBI FOUNDATIONYOUNG AMERICANS CENTER FOR FIN EDUC: $17,500 · OtherYOUNG AMERICANS CENTER FOR FIN EDUCIndividual grant recipient: $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF DENVER: $9,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF DENVERMOUNT EVANS HOME HEALTH & HOSPICE: $8,600 · OtherMOUNT EVANS HOME HEALTH & HOSPICERAFT(RESOURCE AREA FOR TEACHING)COLORADO: $7,600 · OtherCOLORADO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $7,500 · Other+35 more: $51,882 · Other+35 moreUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $59,661 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATI…UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $7,963 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDAT…DENVER KIDS INC: $7,750 · EducationDENVER KIDS INCSTEM Generation Inc: $6,000 · EducationSTEM Generation Inc+5 more: $5,018 · Education+5 moreTHE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC: $13,500 · Human ServicesTHE WOMEN'S …DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $7,250 · Human ServicesDENVER RESCU…Los Cabos Children's Foundation: $5,000 · Human ServicesLos Cabos Ch…RAISE THE FUTURE: $3,000 · Human ServicesRAISE THE FU…THE SEEING EYE INC: $2,875 · Human ServicesTHE SEEING E…+3 more: $2,430 · Human Services+3 moreCenter for the Arts Evergreen Inc: $10,650 · Arts & CultureDENVER ART MUSEUM: $1,525 · Arts & CultureColorado Museum of Natural History: $438 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $425 · Arts & CultureMORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $8,030 · AnimalsFriends of Foothills Animal Shelter: $1,600 · AnimalsEVERGREEN ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE: $1,000 · AnimalsDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $900 · Animals+1 more: $51 · AnimalsFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $7,500 · Food & NutritionRESILIENCE 1220 INC: $7,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $250 · HealthNATIONAL PKU ALLIANCE INC: $250 · Health
Other$153,332Education$86,392Human Services$34,055Arts & Culture$13,038Animals$11,581Food & Nutrition$7,500Health$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $59,661 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC: $13,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCenter for the Arts Evergreen Inc: $10,650 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $8,030 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $7,963 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER KIDS INC: $7,750 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetRAFT(RESOURCE AREA FOR TEACHING)COLORADO: $7,600 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $7,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER RESCUE MISSION: $7,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRESILIENCE 1220 INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetSTEM Generation Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetLos Cabos Children's Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMOUNTAIN RESOURCE CENTER: $3,050 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRAISE THE FUTURE: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC: $2,875 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,850 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE SPRUCE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $2,455 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC: $1,950 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Foothills Animal Shelter: $1,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER ART MUSEUM: $1,525 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSCULPTURE EVERGREEN: $1,400 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetEVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERGREEN ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $930 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKAWEAH DELTA HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDallas Fallen Officer Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetColorado Museum of Natural History: $438 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $425 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBUFFS 4 LIFE: $258 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PKU ALLIANCE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Kennel Club Inc: $51 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds Center for the Arts Evergreen Inc ↗
  • Who funds MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DENVER KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds RAFT(RESOURCE AREA FOR TEACHING)COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds RESILIENCE 1220 INC ↗
  • Who funds STEM Generation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Los Cabos Children's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RAISE THE FUTURE ↗
  • Who funds THE SEEING EYE INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLUE SPRUCE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Foothills Animal Shelter ↗
  • Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds SCULPTURE EVERGREEN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO27.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · El Pomar Foundation · Melvin & Elaine Wolf Foundation · The Janus Henderson Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carter Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carter Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Carter Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph