Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Carter Community Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2022
8
Grants FY2022
4
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Health$39kHuman Services$4kFood & Nutrition$4kAnimals$4kRecreation & Sports$3kYouth Development$1kEducation$500Housing & Shelter$500Other$0
02FY2022 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STAND UP TO CANCER$2,778
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$2,778
BROKEN ARROW SOCCER CLUB$500
JOY IN THE CAUSE COMPANY$500
Individual grant recipient$500
SWIM TULSA$500
WINGS$250
Individual grant recipient$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–20, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMAL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $1k → 10%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $500 → 16%SOLE REASONS FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%THUNDER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
MN
IL
OH
CA
MO
VA
MD
KS
AR
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$28k · 9 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2022, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
30

Total granted

$28k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+13%

Still filing today

78%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NF
    NMDP FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $9k · revenue +33%
  • Special Olympics Oklahoma Inc
    3× · 2019–2021 · $2k · revenue +28%
  • NL
    NO LIMITS FOUNDATION D/B/A CAMP NO LIMITS
    3× · 2019–2021 · $2k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • AL
    AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • American Diabetes Association
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +10%
  • Meals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +45%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pug Rescue Owasso

Pug Rescue Owasso mission is to rescue abused, abandoned, homeless, unwanted , sick and injured pugs. we rehabilitate them medically and emotionally and place them into homes

Animals
2
Dogs As Family Inc

Dogs As Family, Inc. is an all volunteer organization located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Our mission - to rescue, provide sanctuary, rehabilitate, and find loving, forever homes for dogs that have been neglected, are stray, abused or just…

Animals
3
Animal Rescue Foundation Inc

Animal rescue foundation inc (arf) rescues homeless dogs and cats in the tulsa area and helps them find loving homes. we do this by rescuing homelss animals out of area shelters, accepting owner surrendered pets, placing them in foster…

Animals
4
Animal Aid of Tulsa Inc

Animal Aid is a private welfare organization dedicated to saving sick or injured stray dogs and cats, helping pets find loving homes, helping reunite lost and found pets with their owners and encouraging respect and awareness for the…

Animals
5
PAUSE4PAWS Inc

Pause4Paws promotes access to healthcare for pet owners in the Tulsa, Oklahoma, metro area impacted by homelessness, mental illness, or addiction who need inpatient treatment but have no one to care for their pets.

Health
6
Bull Terrier Rescue Mission

The Bull Terrier Rescue Mission (aka BTRM) is an organization of like-minded volunteers committed to protecting the health and welfare of Bull Terriers in need of homes. It extracts them from their unfortunate circumstances, and gives them…

Animals
7
Throw a Dog a Bone Dog Rescue

Throw a Dog a Bone is an all-breed dog rescue located in Austin, TX. We focus on saving dogs primarily in the rural shelters in South Texas. Many of these shelters have no exposure and very few resources. Our mission is to rescue as many…

Animals
8
Infinity Farms Animal Sanctuary and Rescue Inc

Infinity Farms Animal Sanctuary and Rescue is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization providing needy animals with shelter, food, and companionship. The Organization has helped animals all around the state of Oklahoma who are in urgent need of…

9
St Clouds Rescue
Animals
10
The Pet Food Pantry of Oklahoma City Inc

Reduce hunger in pets by providing free pet food and pet services to low income pet owners enabling them to keep their companion animal(s) with them. this includes providing routine vaccinations, spaying/neutering, pet supplies and shelter…

Animals
11
Riding for the Cure
Health
12
Paws in Need Tulsa Inc

The purpose of Paws in Need Tulsa, Inc. is to provide comfort, care, and hope to the Tulsa area's homeless animal population by raising and distributing funds for: veterinary expenses, transport costs, supplies for fosters, boarding costs…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Santas Cause Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support OrganizationsHospice Care ServicesChristian Youth CampsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionYouth Sports Booster Organi…Senior Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%4%<5yr13%8%5–10yr17%23%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr14%27%35–55yr19%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%8%<5yr13%3%5–10yr17%17%10–20yr16%40%20–35yr14%26%35–55yr19%5%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/30
the rest of the field
13%
2,508/19,392

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/27
Grantees still filing
18/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION — $11,799 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION — $4,579 · OtherAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATIONSHAWNEE MISSION MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $1,000 · OtherVERTANS OF FOREIGN WARS — $1,000 · Other+19 more — $6,102 · Other+19 moreNMDP FOUNDATION — $8,718 · PhilanthropyNMDP FOUNDATIONSTAND UP TO CANCER — $2,778 · PhilanthropySTAND UP TO CANCERALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $2,778 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE &…Joy in the Cause Company — $2,500 · HealthJoy in the Cause Comp…NO LIMITS FOUNDATION D/B/A CAMP NO LIMITS — $1,500 · HealthNO LIMITS FOUNDATION …American Diabetes Association — $1,489 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Ass…PHOEBE LOUISE DOOLEY FOUNDATION INC — $800 · HealthPHOEBE LOUISE DOOLEY …BRADY HOPE FROM THE HEART — $666 · HealthBRADY HOPE FROM THE H…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $399 · HealthSpecial Olympics Oklahoma Inc — $1,500 · Recreation & SportsSWIMTULSA INC — $500 · Recreation & SportsBROKEN ARROW SOCCER CLUB — $500 · Recreation & SportsCOMAL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Human ServicesSOLE REASON FOUNDATION — $500 · Human ServicesCITY RESCUE MISSION INC — $500 · Human ServicesTHUNDER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $500 · Human ServicesMeals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc — $1,363 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS OF THE PALM BEACHES INC — $1,000 · Food & NutritionTORNADO ALLEY BULLDOG RESCUE — $500 · AnimalsFREE TO LIVE INC — $300 · AnimalsTulsa SPCA — $300 · AnimalsENID SPCA — $500 · Youth Development
Other$24,480Philanthropy$11,496Health$10,632Recreation & Sports$2,500Human Services$2,500Food & Nutrition$2,363Animals$1,100Youth Development$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNMDP FOUNDATION — $8,718 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $2,778 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJoy in the Cause Company — $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSpecial Olympics Oklahoma Inc — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNO LIMITS FOUNDATION D/B/A CAMP NO LIMITS — $1,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association — $1,489 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc — $1,363 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMAL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHAWNEE MISSION MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF THE PALM BEACHES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHOEBE LOUISE DOOLEY FOUNDATION INC — $800 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetHAVEN AMIMAL RESCUE AND TRANSPORT OF OKLA INC — $600 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetENID SPCA — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITY RESCUE MISSION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTORNADO ALLEY BULLDOG RESCUE — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAGAPE ROAD INC — $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSWIMTULSA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHUNDER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBROKEN ARROW SOCCER CLUB — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $399 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREE TO LIVE INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTulsa SPCA — $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hardesty Family Foundation IncOK15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · The Magnolia Charitable Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Network for Good · Charities Aid Foundation America · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Carter Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 110%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    11get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph