Skip to content

· Private foundation

Carter Community Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2022
8
Grants FY2022
4
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Health$39kHuman Services$4kFood & Nutrition$4kAnimals$4kRecreation & Sports$3kYouth Development$1kEducation$500Housing & Shelter$500Other$0
02FY2022 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STAND UP TO CANCER$2,778
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$2,778
BROKEN ARROW SOCCER CLUB$500
JOY IN THE CAUSE COMPANY$500
SWIM TULSA$500
Individual grant recipient$500
WINGS$250
Individual grant recipient$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMAL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $1k → 10%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $500 → 16%SOLE REASONS FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%THUNDER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MN
IL
OH
CA
MO
VA
MD
KS
AR
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$28k · 9 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
30

Total granted

$28k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+13%

Still filing today

78%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NF
    NMDP FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $9k · revenue +24%
  • Special Olympics Oklahoma Inc
    3× · 2019–2021 · $2k · revenue +36%
  • NL
    NO LIMITS FOUNDATION D/B/A CAMP NO LIMITS
    3× · 2019–2021 · $2k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • AL
    AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • American Diabetes Association
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +10%
  • Meals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +45%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pug Rescue Owasso

Pug Rescue Owasso mission is to rescue abused, abandoned, homeless, unwanted , sick and injured pugs. we rehabilitate them medically and emotionally and place them into homes

Animals
2
Dogs As Family Inc

Dogs As Family, Inc. is an all volunteer organization located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Our mission - to rescue, provide sanctuary, rehabilitate, and find loving, forever homes for dogs that have been neglected, are stray, abused or just…

Animals
3
Animal Rescue Foundation Inc

Animal rescue foundation inc (arf) rescues homeless dogs and cats in the tulsa area and helps them find loving homes. we do this by rescuing homelss animals out of area shelters, accepting owner surrendered pets, placing them in foster…

Animals
4
Animal Aid of Tulsa Inc

Animal Aid is a private welfare organization dedicated to saving sick or injured stray dogs and cats, helping pets find loving homes, helping reunite lost and found pets with their owners and encouraging respect and awareness for the…

Animals
5
PAUSE4PAWS Inc

Pause4Paws promotes access to healthcare for pet owners in the Tulsa, Oklahoma, metro area impacted by homelessness, mental illness, or addiction who need inpatient treatment but have no one to care for their pets.

Health
6
Bull Terrier Rescue Mission

The Bull Terrier Rescue Mission (aka BTRM) is an organization of like-minded volunteers committed to protecting the health and welfare of Bull Terriers in need of homes. It extracts them from their unfortunate circumstances, and gives them…

Animals
7
Throw a Dog a Bone Dog Rescue

Throw a Dog a Bone is an all-breed dog rescue located in Austin, TX. We focus on saving dogs primarily in the rural shelters in South Texas. Many of these shelters have no exposure and very few resources. Our mission is to rescue as many…

Animals
8
Infinity Farms Animal Sanctuary and Rescue Inc

Infinity Farms Animal Sanctuary and Rescue is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization providing needy animals with shelter, food, and companionship. The Organization has helped animals all around the state of Oklahoma who are in urgent need of…

—
9
St Clouds Rescue
Animals
10
The Pet Food Pantry of Oklahoma City Inc

Reduce hunger in pets by providing free pet food and pet services to low income pet owners enabling them to keep their companion animal(s) with them. this includes providing routine vaccinations, spaying/neutering, pet supplies and shelter…

Animals
11
Riding for the Cure
Health
12
Paws in Need Tulsa Inc

The purpose of Paws in Need Tulsa, Inc. is to provide comfort, care, and hope to the Tulsa area's homeless animal population by raising and distributing funds for: veterinary expenses, transport costs, supplies for fosters, boarding costs…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Santas Cause Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/27
Grantees still filing
18/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $11,799 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $4,579 · OtherAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATIONSHAWNEE MISSION MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $1,000 · OtherVERTANS OF FOREIGN WARS: $1,000 · Other+19 more: $6,102 · Other+19 moreNMDP FOUNDATION: $8,718 · PhilanthropyNMDP FOUNDATIONSTAND UP TO CANCER: $2,778 · PhilanthropySTAND UP TO CANCERALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,778 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE &…Joy in the Cause Company: $2,500 · HealthJoy in the Cause Comp…NO LIMITS FOUNDATION D/B/A CAMP NO LIMITS: $1,500 · HealthNO LIMITS FOUNDATION …American Diabetes Association: $1,489 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Ass…PHOEBE LOUISE DOOLEY FOUNDATION INC: $800 · HealthPHOEBE LOUISE DOOLEY …BRADY HOPE FROM THE HEART: $666 · HealthBRADY HOPE FROM THE H…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $399 · HealthSpecial Olympics Oklahoma Inc: $1,500 · Recreation & SportsBROKEN ARROW SOCCER CLUB: $500 · Recreation & SportsSWIMTULSA INC: $500 · Recreation & SportsCOMAL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Human ServicesCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $500 · Human ServicesSOLE REASON FOUNDATION: $500 · Human ServicesTHUNDER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 · Human ServicesMeals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc: $1,363 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS OF THE PALM BEACHES INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionTORNADO ALLEY BULLDOG RESCUE: $500 · AnimalsFREE TO LIVE INC: $300 · AnimalsTulsa SPCA: $300 · AnimalsENID SPCA: $500 · Youth Development
Other$24,480Philanthropy$11,496Health$10,632Recreation & Sports$2,500Human Services$2,500Food & Nutrition$2,363Animals$1,100Youth Development$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNMDP FOUNDATION: $8,718 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,778 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJoy in the Cause Company: $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSpecial Olympics Oklahoma Inc: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNO LIMITS FOUNDATION D/B/A CAMP NO LIMITS: $1,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $1,489 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc: $1,363 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMAL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF THE PALM BEACHES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHAWNEE MISSION MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetPHOEBE LOUISE DOOLEY FOUNDATION INC: $800 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetHAVEN AMIMAL RESCUE AND TRANSPORT OF OKLA INC: $600 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetENID SPCA: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROKEN ARROW SOCCER CLUB: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAGAPE ROAD INC: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSWIMTULSA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHUNDER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTORNADO ALLEY BULLDOG RESCUE: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $399 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREE TO LIVE INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTulsa SPCA: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hardesty Family Foundation IncOK15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · The Magnolia Charitable Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Network for Good · Charities Aid Foundation America · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carter Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carter Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    11get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carter’s filings →

    More from the funding graph