Skip to content

· Private foundation

Carter and Melissa Cafritz Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$265k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$340kArts & Culture$210kEmployment$175kHuman Services$153kYouth Development$150kEducation$110kHealth$105kCommunity Improvement$70kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $190k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$70,000
MARTHA'S TABLE INC$30,000
LIFE PIECES TO MASTERPIECES$30,000
DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC$25,000
WETA$20,000
CORNERSTONE$15,000
CRITICAL EXPOSURE$10,000
BREAD FOR THE CITY$10,000
CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK$10,000
NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICE$10,000
BRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC$10,000
FOODS AND FRIENDS$10,000
REBUILDING TOGETHER$10,000
BUILDING BRIDGES ACROSS THE RIVER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $153k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 7%CORNERSTONES: $10k → 6%CORNERSTONES: $2k → 6%CORNERSTONES: $1k → 6%NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICE: $10k → 6%NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICE: $10k → 6%NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICE: $10k → 6%NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICE: $10k → 6%NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICE: $10k → 6%NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICE: $10k → 6%THE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES: $35k → 14%THE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES: $25k → 14%THE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 22 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
5

Total granted

$1.4M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
0%

Still filing today

82%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    MARTHA'S TABLE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $175k · revenue +41%
  • TD
    THE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $170k · revenue +85%
  • BB
    BRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $110k · revenue +121%

Funded once

  • JF
    JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • MG
    MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • DA
    DC ALLIANCE OF YOUTH ADVOCATES
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -100%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arcadia Food Inc

Cultivate local food systems prioritizing health, equity, and sustainability, from farm forward.

Food & Nutrition
2
Freshfarm Markets

Freshfarm is a washington, dc-based nonprofit that builds a more equitable, sustainable, and resilient food system in the mid-atlantic region by producing innovative solutions in partnership with local communities and organizations. we…

Food & Nutrition
3
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
4
Youthbuild Dc Public Charter School Inc

Youthbuild pcs seeks to transform the lives of disconnected youth by offering a program, in english and spanish, that combines rigorous academic instruction with vocational training, life and employability skills- building, and community…

Education
5
The Friends of Crown Heights Educational Centers Inc

To provide a safe, affordable and comprehensive program of high-quality early childhood education, parental and family support, as well as academic enrichment and recreational programs.

Human Services
6
Ingenuity Prep

Ingenuity prep public charter school was formed to prepare students to succeed in college and beyond as impactful civiic leaders.

Education
7
Collaborative Solutions for Communities

To be the leading solution-focused resource in building strong, sustainable families and communities through family support services, innovative training, community capacity building, economic development and social enterprise.

Crime & Legal
8
Creighton Community Foundation

Creighton community foundation's (ccf) core program "community works" leverages neighborhood schools to support vibrant communities in the poorest parts of urban phoenix, where neighborhoods suffer from poverty- driven disadvantage and…

Philanthropy
9
The District of Columbia Children's Advocacy Center

Safe shores provides survivor-centered intervention, hope and healing for children and families affected by abuse, trauma and violence in the district of columbia, and works to prevent and end child abuse and neglect through promising…

Crime & Legal
10
Educare Dc

Educare dc's mission is to eliminate the opportunity gap for young children living in poverty and give them the skills necessary for success in kindergarten and beyond. we work at the intersection of practice, policy, and research to…

Human Services
11
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
12
The Food Trust

The food trust (tft), a nonprofit founded in philadelphia in 1992, strives to make healthy food available to all.continued on schedule otft is a regional and national leader in developing new strategies to prevent childhood obesity and…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Martha's Table Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dc Alliance of Youth Advocates. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $170,000 · OtherTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INCBRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC: $110,000 · OtherBRIGHT BEGINNINGS INCIndividual grant recipient: $105,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL: $30,000 · OtherNANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITALCORNERSTONE: $20,000 · Other+7 more: $65,000 · Other+7 moreMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $175,000 · Food & NutritionMARTHA'S TABLE INCBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $60,000 · Food & NutritionBREAD FOR THE CITY INCCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $55,000 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK IN…Feeding America: $40,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding AmericaGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $90,000 · Arts & CultureGREATER WASHINGTON …LIFE PIECES TO MASTERPIECES: $70,000 · Arts & CultureLIFE PIECES TO MAST…National Gallery of Art: $50,000 · Arts & CultureNational Gallery of…JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $40,000 · Arts & CultureJOHN F KENNEDY CENT…THE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES: $80,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF …NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesNORTHERN VI…CORNERSTONES INC: $13,000 · Human ServicesCORNERSTONE…SIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $65,000 · HealthFOOD & FRIENDS INC: $10,000 · HealthLATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentCritical Exposure Inc: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentBUILDING BRIDGES ACROSS THE RIVER INC: $70,000 · Community Improvement
Other$500,000Food & Nutrition$330,000Arts & Culture$250,000Human Services$153,000Health$75,000Youth Development$75,000Community Improvement$70,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $175,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $170,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC: $110,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $90,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES: $80,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLIFE PIECES TO MASTERPIECES: $70,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetBUILDING BRIDGES ACROSS THE RIVER INC: $70,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $60,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER: $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $55,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNational Gallery of Art: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCritical Exposure Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONES INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD & FRIENDS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE URBAN ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES ↗
  • Who funds LIFE PIECES TO MASTERPIECES ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING BRIDGES ACROSS THE RIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds SIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BREAD FOR THE CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds LATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds National Gallery of Art ↗
  • Who funds JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds Critical Exposure Inc ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER INC ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONES INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD & FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds DC ALLIANCE OF YOUTH ADVOCATES ↗
  • Who funds THE URBAN ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eugene & Agnes E Meyer FoundationDC15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eugene & Agnes E Meyer Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · Greater Washington Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carter and Melissa Cafritz Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carter and Melissa Cafritz Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carter and Melissa Cafritz’s filings →

    More from the funding graph