Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Carruth Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$500k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$2.4MInternational$740kEnvironment$600kHuman Services$208kArts & Culture$99kFood & Nutrition$87kEducation$82kHealth$66kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $133k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $350k
$35,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$9.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARINE REACH GLOBAL$125,000
KBC MINISTRIES INC$125,000
REACH THE REST INC$100,000
GILLESPIE COUNTY WILD GAME DINNER INC$41,000
GILLESPIE COUNTY YOUTH LIVESTOCK SHOW$37,000
GILLESPIE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY PIONEER MUSEUM$35,000
ANGEL FLIGHT INC$10,000
THE GOLDEN HUB MEALS ON WHEELS$10,000
BOOT RANCH SCHOLARSHIP FUND$5,000
ADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATION$5,000
TEXAS BAPTIST MEN$5,000
THE GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LITTLE HEARTS CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $10k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
PA
CA
CO
VA
TN
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.2M · 20 repeat orgs$156k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +103% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
17

Total granted

$4.2M
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+103%
+33%

Still filing today

50%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationInternationalHuman ServicesArts & CulturePublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EI
    Epic International Corporation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $925k · revenue +105%
  • KM
    KBC Ministries Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $720k · revenue +26%
  • GC
    GILLESPIE COUNTY YOUTH LIVESTOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $77k · revenue ×28

Funded once

  • MM
    MIDLAND MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • LH
    LITTLE HEARTS CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • CI
    CHRISTMAS IN ACTION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +125%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Austin Christian Foundation

Mobilizing resources by inspiring biblical generosity in the greater austin, texas area.

Religion
2
India Gospel Mission

Leadership training and charitable work

Religion
3
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
4
Ariel Ministries

Ariel ministries exists to bring the good news of the messiah to jewish people and to disciple believers through intensive bible teaching from a messianic jewish perspective and dispensational theological position. continued on schedule o

Religion
5
Texas Independent Baptist Seminary

To educate and prepare men and women for christian leadership in ministry.

Religion
6
Hill Country Daily Bread

Hill country daily bread ministries is a faith based ministry whose mission is to help unite and equip the hill country community with food, resources and training necessary to transform our communities and the lives of those in poverty…

Food & Nutrition
7
Texas Flying Legends Museum
8
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
9
Shalom of Texas Ministries

To reach the texas capitol community for christ

Religion
10
Impact Global Outreach

To propagate the gospel of our lord jesus christ by evangelization and discipleship through both home and foreign missions. impact global accomplishes this by supporting national missionaries who are preaching the gospel of jesus christ.

11
Lone Star Flight Museum

Lone Star Flight Museum (LSFM) celebrates flight and achievements in Texas aviation, engages youth through STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math), and believes aviation inspires achievement and endless possibilities.

Arts & Culture
12
The Grace Center

Provide support and services for individuals impacted by domestic violence

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Public Policy Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEducation Equity LeadershipFallen First Responder Supp…Community Arts OrganizationsGovernment Accountability R…Veteran Support ServicesIndependent K-8 SchoolsSenior Support ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%12%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr16%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%42%10–20yr16%46%20–35yr13%6%35–55yr16%6%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,537

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MARINE REACH MINISTRIES — $665,000 · OtherMARINE REACH MINISTRIESFANNIN TERRACE BAPTIST CHURCH — $600,000 · OtherFANNIN TERRACE BAPTIST CHURCHMARINE REACH GLOBAL — $600,000 · OtherMARINE REACH GLOBALTHE SUMMIT CHURCH INC — $120,000 · OtherTHE GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER — $102,000 · Other+25 more — $432,326 · Other+25 moreEpic International Corporation — $925,000 · ReligionEpic International Corpo…+2 more — $20,000 · ReligionKBC Ministries Inc — $720,000 · InternationalKBC Ministries Inc+1 more — $5,000 · InternationalGILLESPIE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $55,000 · Arts & CultureADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATION — $14,250 · Arts & CultureGillespie County Wild Game Dinner Inc — $41,000 · Youth DevelopmentANGEL FLIGHT INC DBA ANGEL FLIGHT SOUTH CENTRAL — $40,000 · HealthSENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC — $21,000 · Human ServicesLITTLE HEARTS CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $10,000 · Human Services
Other$2,519,326Religion$945,000International$725,000Arts & Culture$69,250Youth Development$41,000Health$40,000Human Services$31,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEpic International Corporation — $925,000 over 8y, 7.0% of budgetKBC Ministries Inc — $720,000 over 7y, 19% of budgetGILLESPIE COUNTY YOUTH LIVESTOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION — $76,750 over 3y, 24% of budgetGILLESPIE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $55,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetGillespie County Wild Game Dinner Inc — $41,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetANGEL FLIGHT INC DBA ANGEL FLIGHT SOUTH CENTRAL — $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC — $21,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY NEEDS COUNCIL — $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATION — $14,250 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMIDLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTMAS IN ACTION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetLeadership Institute — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHERIFFS ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE TBMOPA FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROSS LINKS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJONI AND FRIENDS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Epic International Corporation
  • Who funds KBC Ministries Inc
  • Who funds GILLESPIE COUNTY YOUTH LIVESTOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds GILLESPIE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds Gillespie County Wild Game Dinner Inc
  • Who funds ANGEL FLIGHT INC DBA ANGEL FLIGHT SOUTH CENTRAL
  • Who funds SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC
  • Who funds HILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY NEEDS COUNCIL
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds ADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LITTLE HEARTS CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER
  • Who funds MIDLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
  • Who funds CHRISTMAS IN ACTION INC
  • Who funds Leadership Institute
  • Who funds SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS
  • Who funds THE TBMOPA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CROSS LINKS INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY
  • Who funds TEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds JONI AND FRIENDS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Adam R Scripps FoundationKY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Adam R Scripps Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Permian Basin Area Foundation · The Robert P and Mariana R Scripps Family Foundation Inc · Dian Graves Owen Foundation · The Community Foundation of the Texas Hill Country Inc · Abell-Hanger Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Carruth Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Carruth Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Carruth Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph