Skip to content
Carriuolo Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Carriuolo Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$114k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$174kEducation$83kHealth$76kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kEnvironment$27kAnimals$21kInternational$18kHuman Services$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $65k
$8,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$450k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$15,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD NNE$10,000
GOOD SHEPHERD FOOD BANK$10,000
MAINE NEEDS$10,000
PREBLE STREET FOOD KITCHEN$10,000
PALM BEACH COUNTY FOOD BANK$10,000
CULTIVATING COMMUNITY$8,000
MABEL WADSWORTH HEALTH CENTER$8,000
THE TREVOR PROJECT$8,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$8,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$7,000
BOSTON UNIVERSITY$5,000
ST FRANCIS SCHOOL$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MAINE NEEDS: $10k → 7%MAINE NEEDS: $8k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
MA
CT
CA
UT
CO
KY
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$392k · 17 repeat orgs$68k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
9

Total granted

$392k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+34%

Still filing today

65%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionAnimalsInternationalHealthArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    Good Shepherd Food Bank
    6× · 2020–2025 · $44k · revenue +50%
  • CC
    CULTIVATING COMMUNITY
    7× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +15%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2025 · $35k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +34%
  • UF
    UTAH FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +3%
  • SC
    SECOND CHANCE FOR HOMELESS PETS
    one grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wedontwaste Inc

We Dont Waste increases food access and protects the planet by rescuing and repurposing food, while educating and advocating to increase food security and decrease food waste.

Food & Nutrition
2
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
3
Fork Food Lab

Fork Food Lab is a nonprofit food business incubator and shared commercial kitchen focused on growing the local food economy. We support the growth of sustainable Maine-based businesses by providing entrepreneurs with work space,…

Environment
4
Boulder Food Rescue

Food redistribution- rescue food that would otherwise go to waste and distribute it to low-income communities across Boulder.

Food & Nutrition
5
The Farm Collaborative

Growing a local food system where the health of people and planet come first

Education
6
Butte Emergency Food Bank

Provide food for individuals in need

—
7
Second Chance Foods Inc

Second Chance Foods (SCF or the Organization) is dedicated to reducing food waste by rescuing food that would otherwise be discarded, reducing hunger on a local basis while elevating the health of those served by the program, and reducing…

Food & Nutrition
8
EastWest Food Rescue

Supporting farmers and caringly feeding our neighbors in need.

Food & Nutrition
9
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
10
Wolfe's Neck Farm Foundation

The mission of Wolfe's Neck Center for Agriculture & The Environment is to transform our relationship with farming and food for a healthier planet.

Philanthropy
11
Portland Farmers Market

Pfm operates world-class farmers markets that contribute to the success of local food growers and producers and create vibrant community gatherings. as a trade association, success for our vendors is our primary objective. listening and…

Community Improvement
12
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Central Kitchen Inc; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
12/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PREBLE STREET FOOD KITCHEN: $41,500 · OtherPREBLE STREET FOOD KITCHENST FRANCIS SCHOOL: $36,500 · OtherST FRANCIS SCHOOLTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $35,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYMABEL WADSWORTH HEALTH CENTER: $31,000 · OtherMABEL WADSWORTH HEALTH CENTERPLANNED PARENTHOOD NNE: $17,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD NNEPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $15,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODNorthwest Family Assistance Center: $10,500 · OtherUTAH FOOD BANK: $10,000 · OtherGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherWATERFALL ARTS: $8,500 · Other+6 more: $28,545 · Other+6 moreGood Shepherd Food Bank: $43,500 · Food & NutritionGood Shepherd Food BankCULTIVATING COMMUNITY: $40,000 · Food & NutritionCULTIVATING COMMUNITYPalm Beach County Food Bank Inc: $25,000 · Food & NutritionPalm Beach County Food Bank…+1 more: $3,500 · Food & NutritionWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $25,000 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · InternationalENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $27,000 · EnvironmentBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $10,000 · AnimalsSECOND CHANCE FOR HOMELESS PETS: $8,000 · AnimalsANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY INC: $3,000 · AnimalsMaine Needs Inc: $18,000 · Human ServicesPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $8,000 · HealthMABEL WADSWORTH WOMEN'S HEALTH CTR: $5,000 · Health
Other$243,545Food & Nutrition$112,000International$35,000Environment$27,000Animals$21,000Human Services$18,000Health$13,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGood Shepherd Food Bank: $43,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCULTIVATING COMMUNITY: $40,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $27,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPalm Beach County Food Bank Inc: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMaine Needs Inc: $18,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwest Family Assistance Center: $10,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATERFALL ARTS: $8,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetBroward Education Foundation Inc: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND CHANCE FOR HOMELESS PETS: $8,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetMABEL WADSWORTH WOMEN'S HEALTH CTR: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDENVER FOOD RESCUE: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maine Community Found…Elmina B Sewall Found…Bangor Savings Bank F…ImpactassetsincAmerican Endowment Fo…Network for GoodThe Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Maine Community Foundation IncME15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Impactassetsinc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carriuolo Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carriuolo Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Carriuolo Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home