· Private foundation
Carp Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| IDEATE COMMUNITY | $10,000 |
| KIDS SMILES | $8,031 |
| SUNDANCE INSTITUTE | $6,904 |
| WOMEN OF TOMORROW | $6,204 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,525 |
| ISRAEL TENNIS & EDUCATION CENTERS | $2,417 |
| DANIEL B ALLANOFF FOUNDATION | $2,400 |
| DO GOODERS | $1,825 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER PBC | $1,324 |
| CHILD CRISIS TREATMENT CENTER | $1,050 |
| PASADENA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $360 |
| BOYS TOWN JERUSELUM FOUNDATION | $150 |
| JACK M BARRACK HEBREW ACADEMY | $118 |
| CHILDREN FIRST INC | $104 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LMLANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION2× · 2020–2025 · $26k · revenue +56%
- TCTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA6× · 2017–2023 · $14k · revenue +88%
- NANATIONAL ABILITY CENTER4× · 2019–2023 · $14k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- BABIG ARTS ORGANIZATION INCone grant, 2023 · $32k · revenue +25%
- TGTEAM GLEASON FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +308%
- KYKOHELET YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +65%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.
The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.
Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.
Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.
Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…
The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.
See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Gives Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Dream Big Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 15% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE GREATER NEW ORLEANS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BIG ARTS ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds LANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WOMEN OF TOMORROW MENTOR AND SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE DREAM BIG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KIDS SMILES INC ↗
- Who funds TREE HOUSE BOOKS ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds DANIEL B ALLANOFF FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KOHELET YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds IMMUNE DEFICIENCY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ABACO MEDICAL RELIEF FUND ↗
- Who funds JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR ADULTS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES INC ↗
- Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
- Who funds CHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TILT INSTITUTE FOR THE CONTEMPORARY IMAGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · The Gordon Charter Foundation · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · The Goldstein Axelman Family Foundation · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Carp Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.