Skip to content

· Private foundation

Carl S and Barbara L Stanley 1997 Charitable

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$51kEducation$35kEnvironment$32kArts & Culture$19kFood & Nutrition$16kCommunity Improvement$12kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kReligion$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$603k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BROOKVIEW MONTISSORI SCHOOL$7,000
HOLY FAMILY LUTHERAN SCHOOL OF CHICAGO$2,000
NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER$2,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$2,000
TEAM RUBICON$2,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$2,000
TRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION$2,000
HONOR FLIGHT$2,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$2,000
416TH BOMB GROUP$2,000
THE CRADLE SOCIETY$2,000
EXECUTIVE SERVICE CORPS OF CHICAGO$2,000
NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION$1,000
ALLIANCE FOR THE GREAT LAKES$1,000
SIERRA CLUB$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%BRAVE HEARTS: $1k → 6%HONOR FLIGHT: $3k → 7%WOUNDED WARRIERS PROJECT: $2k → 14%HONOR FLIGHT: $2k → 7%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $2k → 14%HONOR FLIGHT: $2k → 7%HONOR FLIGHT: $1k → 7%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $2k → 14%HONOR FLIGHT: $1k → 7%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $2k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $2k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $2k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
CA
MO
VA
DC
OK
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$181k · 24 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
7

Total granted

$181k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+29%

Still filing today

67%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEnvironmentEducationFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $15k · revenue +17%
  • TC
    The Cradle Society
    6× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +16%
  • NS
    NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • BM
    BROOKVIEW MONTESSORI SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • CF
    COLLINGS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • RC
    RED CROSS OF TN AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
2
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
3
National Veterans Legal Services Program Inc

To provide at no cost legal assistance to veterans of the u.s. armed forces and current service members.

—
4
Air & Space Forces Association

The air & space forces association (afa) is a nonprofit, independent, professional military, and aerospace education association. the association's mission is to promote dominant u.s. air and space forces as the foundation of a strong…

Education
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
6
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
7
Truman National Security Project

We offer timely, principled, and innovative solutions to pressing national security challenges. we envision an inclusive us national security policy that makes american lives better because it advances democracy, human rights, prosperity,…

International
8
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
9
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
10
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
11
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
12
Minnesota Land Trust

The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BROOKVIEW MONTISSORI SCHOOL: $13,000 · OtherBROOKVIEW MONTISSORI SCHOOLThe Cradle Society: $12,000 · OtherThe Cradle Society416TH BOMB GROUP ARCHIVE: $11,000 · Other416TH BOMB GROUP ARCHIVEALLIANCE FOR THE GREAT LAKES: $9,100 · OtherALLIANCE FOR THE GREAT LAKESAMERICAN RED CROSS: $9,100 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSKENILWORTH UNION CHURCH: $6,000 · OtherKENILWORTH UNION CHURCHBROOKVIEW MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $5,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $5,000 · OtherNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherCOLLINGS FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Other416TH BOMB GROUP: $4,000 · OtherHOLY FAMILY LUTHERAN SCHOOL OF CHICAGO: $4,000 · OtherTEAM RUBICON INC: $6,000 · OtherTEAM RUBICON INCTRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION: $6,000 · OtherTRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION+4 more: $7,000 · Other+4 moreNORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $12,000 · Human ServicesNORTH SHORE SENI…HONOR FLIGHT INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesHONOR FLIGHT INCWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR …BRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $1,000 · Human ServicesGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $15,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER C…MEALS ON WHEELS: $1,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON …THE MORTON ARBORETUM: $8,100 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $4,600 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EnvironmentHOLY FAMILY MINISTRIES: $8,000 · EducationFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $3,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationExecutive Service Corps of Chicago: $12,000 · Community ImprovementWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $8,100 · Arts & Culture
Other$106,200Human Services$28,000Food & Nutrition$16,000Environment$14,700Education$13,000Community Improvement$12,000Arts & Culture$8,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Cradle Society: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetExecutive Service Corps of Chicago: $12,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetALLIANCE FOR THE GREAT LAKES: $9,100 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHONOR FLIGHT INC: $9,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $8,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MORTON ARBORETUM: $8,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOLY FAMILY MINISTRIES: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $4,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds The Cradle Society ↗
  • Who funds NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Executive Service Corps of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR THE GREAT LAKES ↗
  • Who funds HONOR FLIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MORTON ARBORETUM ↗
  • Who funds HOLY FAMILY MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
  • Who funds TRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds TAYLOR HAUGEN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL13.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carl S and Barbara L Stanley 1997 Charitable funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carl S and Barbara L Stanley 1997 Charitable. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Carl S and Barbara L Stanley 1997’s filings →

More from the funding graph