Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cares Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$302k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$6.6MHuman Services$1.2MHousing & Shelter$438kEducation$35kCivil Rights$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+1 grant · $302k
$110,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$34M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARM REDUCTION SERVICES (HRS)$302,163
COMMUNITY AGAINST SEXUAL HARM (CASH)$191,591
SACRAMENTO LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER$168,565
ONE COMMUNITY HEALTH$150,000
SIERRA FOOTHILLS AIDS FOUNDATION$149,303
SUNBURST PROJECTS$110,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE$80,000
SAFER ALTERNATIVES THRU NETWORKING AND EXCHANGE (SANE)$67,171
COMMUNICARE HEALTH CENTERS$65,655
GOLDEN RULE SERVICES$50,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $847k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FREED CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $25k → 11%COMMUNITY AGAINST SEXUAL HARM: $53k → 12%COMMUNITY AGAINST SEXUAL HARM: $38k → 12%COMMUNITY AGAINST SEXUAL HARM: $33k → 12%COMMUNITY AGAINST SEXUAL HARM: $21k → 12%COMMUNITY AGAINST SEXUAL HARM: $16k → 12%GOLDEN RULE SERVICES: $80k → 12%GOLDEN RULE SERVICES: $50k → 12%GOLDEN RULE SERVICES: $50k → 12%GOLDEN RULE SERVICES: $44k → 12%WIND YOUTH SERVICES: $138k → 12%WIND YOUTH SERVICES: $130k → 12%WIND YOUTH SERVICES: $24k → 12%WIND YOUTH SERVICES: $146k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.1M · 17 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
7

Total granted

$7.1M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
+94%

Still filing today

59%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $149k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HR
    HARM REDUCTION SERVICES INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +171% · 26% of their budget
  • SL
    Sacramento LGBT Community Center
    5× · 2020–2024 · $813k · revenue +90%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $402k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • CC
    CARES Community Healthgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $649k · revenue +193%
  • SC
    SAC COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH
    one grant, 2023 · $200k
  • GH
    GENDER HEALTH CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $125k · revenue +50%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northern Nevada Hiv Outpatient Program Education and Services

Northern Nevada Hopes provides affordable, high-quality, medical, behavioral health, and support services for all. We are dedicated to building a healthier community by providing coordinated care and support for individuals and family…

Health
2
Central Valley Gender Health & Wellness
Civil Rights
3
Community Access National Network Cann

To define, promote, and improve access to healthcare services and supports for people living with HIV/AIDS and/or viral hepatitis through advocacy, education, and networking. These services must be affordable to the people who need them…

Health
4
Westside Community Mental Health Center Westside Community Services Inc

The mission of Westside Community Services is to provide high quality, family-centered, culturally competent behavioral health and human services for the residents of the city and county of San Francisco.

Health
5
Primary Care at Home Inc

We provide healthcare and health management services in the Oakland, California Bay Area. We seek to recognize, empathize, and correctly respond to clients individual needs both medically and psychosocially. Everyone in our care is treated…

Health
6
The Philadelphia Center

Hiv/aids counseling/assistance

—
7
The Spahr Center

The Spahr Center provides cultural, community, and health programs and direct services that celebrate and support Marin County, California's LGBTQ+ and HIV communities.

—
8
Harm Reduction Therapy Center

Harm Reduction Therapy Center is dedicated to providing treatment to people with co-occurring substance misuse and mental illness, and training mental health, drug treatment, and social service providers who work with complex…

Health
9
Northern Valley Harm Reduction Coalition

Northern Valley Harm Reduction Coalition is a 501c3 Non-Profit and Physician Lead Harm Reduction Program. Our program provides life saving Naloxone, Overdose Reversal Training, Safe Use Supplies, Syringe Disposal, HIV/HCV Testing, Drug…

Education
10
Oakland Lgbtq Community Center Inc

The Oakland LGBTQ Community Center is dedicated to enhancing and sustaining the well-being of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) individuals, our families and allies, by providing educational, social, and health related…

Community Improvement
11
Wellness Aids Services Inc

Provide education, support services, and prevention services for persons living with and at risk for hiv/aids.

Health
12
Cal-Pep Inc

Calpep is dedicated to providing coordinated hiv, substance abuse, mental health, employment support, and violence prevention services to the highest need communities of color in the san francisco bay area.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gender Health Center; the most unlike its peers is Life Enriching Communication. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ONE COMMUNITY HEALTH: $1,211,738 · OtherONE COMMUNITY HEALTHSacramento LGBT Community Center: $812,918 · OtherSacramento LGBT Community CenterSACRAMENTO COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH: $585,000 · OtherSACRAMENTO COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTHCOMMUNITY AGAINST SEXUAL HARM (CASH): $374,091 · OtherCOMMUNITY AGAINST SEXUAL HARM (CASH)Sunburst Projects: $341,706 · OtherSunburst ProjectsCOMMUNICARE HEALTH: $250,000 · OtherCOMMUNICARE HEALTHSAC COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH: $200,000 · Other+6 more: $492,817 · Other+6 moreCARES Community Health: $649,430 · HealthCARES Community HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC: $402,165 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR…SAFER ALTERNATIVES THROUGH NETWORKING AND EDUCATION: $321,965 · HealthSAFER ALTERNATIVES THR…SIERRA FOOTHILLS AIDS FOUNDATION: $149,303 · HealthSIERRA FOOTHILLS AIDS …GENDER HEALTH CENTER: $125,000 · HealthGENDER HEALTH CENTER+1 more: $20,000 · HealthHARM REDUCTION SERVICES INC: $1,511,332 · Civil RightsHARM REDUCTION SERVI…WIND YOUTH SERVICES INC: $437,726 · Human ServicesWIND YOUTH …Golden Rule Services: $224,400 · Human ServicesGolden Rule…COMMUNITY AGAINST SEXUAL HARM: $160,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY A…+1 more: $25,000 · Human ServicesLIFE ENRICHING COMMUNICATION: $35,000 · Education
Other$4,268,270Health$1,667,863Civil Rights$1,511,332Human Services$847,126Education$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHARM REDUCTION SERVICES INC: $1,511,332 over 6y, 26% of budgetSacramento LGBT Community Center: $812,918 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetCARES Community Health: $649,430 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetWIND YOUTH SERVICES INC: $437,726 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC: $402,165 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSunburst Projects: $341,706 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetSAFER ALTERNATIVES THROUGH NETWORKING AND EDUCATION: $321,965 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetGolden Rule Services: $224,400 over 4y, 15% of budgetCOMMUNITY AGAINST SEXUAL HARM: $160,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetSIERRA FOOTHILLS AIDS FOUNDATION: $149,303 over 1y, 11% of budgetCOMMUNICARE HEALTH CENTERS: $140,655 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGENDER HEALTH CENTER: $125,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetLIFE ENRICHING COMMUNICATION: $35,000 over 1y, 77% of budgetFREED Center for Independent Living Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNorcal AIDS Challenge: $20,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HARM REDUCTION SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Sacramento LGBT Community Center ↗
  • Who funds CARES Community Health ↗
  • Who funds WIND YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Sunburst Projects ↗
  • Who funds SAFER ALTERNATIVES THROUGH NETWORKING AND EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds Golden Rule Services ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY AGAINST SEXUAL HARM ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA FOOTHILLS AIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNICARE HEALTH CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds GENDER HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LIFE ENRICHING COMMUNICATION ↗
  • Who funds FREED Center for Independent Living Inc ↗
  • Who funds Norcal AIDS Challenge ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCA18.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Sierra Health Foundation · Sacramento Region Community Foundation · Dignity Health · Norcal AIDS Challenge · Essential Access Health · The California Endowment · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Public Health Institute · Direct Relief · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cares Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cares Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cares Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Cares Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cares’ filings →

    More from the funding graph