Skip to content
Capucille Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Capucille Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$62k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$447kReligion$180kHousing & Shelter$45kHealth$42kHuman Services$40kFood & Nutrition$28kInternational$12kPhilanthropy$5k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $57k
$14,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$565k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KING'S CROSS CHURCH$15,000
OKLAHOMA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$15,000
BE THE LIGHT MINISTRIES$14,500
HOPE HOUSE GUTHRIE$12,700
THE ACADEMY OF CLASSICAL CHRISTIAN STUDIES$3,500
CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $13k → 9%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $20k → 16%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$652k · 6 repeat orgs$147k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +374% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
11

Total granted

$652k
$117k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+374%
-1%

Still filing today

67%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionFood & NutritionEducationHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ACADEMY OF CLASSICAL CHRISTIAN STUDIES INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $432k · revenue +374%
  • RI
    RESTOREOKC INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $112k · revenue +719%
  • THE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC
    2× · 2018–2021 · $15k · revenue +293%

Funded once

  • CITY RESCUE MISSION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +145%
  • RF
    REGIONAL FOOD BANK FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue -86%
  • MO
    MINISTRIES OF JESUS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $13k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Churches United for Community Concern

The mission of churches united for community concern is to provide compassionate support to individuals and families needing assistance through contributions of christian and other religious and civic organizations.

—
2
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
3
Christ Outreach Oklahoma Inc

Evangelistic preaching the good news of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Missionary and support of missionaries at home and abroad. Praying and counseling with Gods people both at home and in the field. Benevolence to needy.

Religion
4
Habitat for Humanity of Okaloosa County Inc

Okaloosa habitat for humanity is a non-profit, christian organization dedicated to eliminating substandard housing in okaloosa county. we provide opportunites for the community to show god's love in action. through partnership with people…

Housing & Shelter
5
Oklahoma Christian Academy Inc

Establish, maintain, and conduct a school for the instruction and training of youth.

Education
6
Central Oklahoma Habitat for Humanity Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, central oklahoma habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, community and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

Housing & Shelter
7
Community Food Bank of Eastern Oklahoma Inc

Lead engaged partners in the fight against hunger in eastern oklahoma.

Food & Nutrition
8
One Church One Child Inc

To inform the public the need for bridge family homes and identify families interested in adopting or fostering children of all races with special emphasis on African American children in state custody.

Housing & Shelter
9
Okmulgee County Homeless Shelter Inc

To promote the welfare of okmulgee county by providing temporary shelter and food for homeless and destitute persons

Human Services
10
Grace Center of Southern Oklahoma

To prevent homelessness and increase self-sufficiency for all people. the center provides educaton and resource assistance in a culturally sensitive, encouraging, and christ-centered environment.

Human Services
11
Oklahoma Coalition for Affordable Housing Inc

The organization is an advocacy and member organization that helps lead the movement to ensure that all residents in oklahoma flourish in safe, afordable homes and the helps communities develope safe and afordable housing options.

Community Improvement
12
Central Oklahoma United Methodist Retirement Facility Inc

To develop and provide premier, wellness-based campuses and community outreach.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Restoreokc Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Academy of Classical Christian Studies Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ACADEMY OF CLASSICAL CHRISTIAN STUDIES INC: $432,439 · EducationTHE ACADEMY OF CLASSICAL CHRISTIAN STUDIES INCKINGS CROSS CHURCH: $51,000 · OtherKINGS CROSS CHURCHHOPE HOUSE GUTHRIE: $27,950 · OtherHOPE HOUSE GUTHRIEOKLAHOMA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC: $15,000 · OtherOKLAHOMA CHRISTIAN S…BE THE LIGHT MINISTRIES: $14,500 · OtherBE THE LIGHT MINISTR…MISSION TO NORTH AMERICA: $12,000 · OtherMISSION TO NORTH AME…CITY RESCUE CENTER: $10,000 · OtherCITY RESCUE CENTERCLEVELAND CLINIC: $10,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINICCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Other+1 more: $2,000 · OtherRESTOREOKC INC: $112,000 · ReligionRESTOREOKC INCMINISTRIES OF JESUS INC: $12,500 · ReligionMINISTRIES OF JES…CITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesThe Center of Family Love: $14,000 · Human ServicesHOPE CENTER OF EDMOND INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesREGIONAL FOOD BANK FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Food & NutritionREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $8,000 · Food & NutritionTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Education$432,439Other$147,450Religion$124,500Human Services$46,500Food & Nutrition$28,000Housing & Shelter$15,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ACADEMY OF CLASSICAL CHRISTIAN STUDIES INC: $432,439 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetRESTOREOKC INC: $112,000 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetOKLAHOMA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Center of Family Love: $14,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMINISTRIES OF JESUS INC: $12,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Communi…Servant FoundationInasmuch FoundationThe Merrick FoundationNatl Christian Charit…Network for GoodAmerican Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Capucille Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Capucille Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Capucille Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home