Skip to content
Callejo-Botello Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Callejo-Botello Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$45k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$146kCrime & Legal$90kPublic Benefit$73kHuman Services$25kYouth Development$10kHousing & Shelter$2kCivil Rights$1k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $38k
$12,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$15,000
IMMSCHOOLS$12,500
YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS$10,000
VOLAR$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS: $10k → 14%WESLEY-RANKIN COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$132k · 3 repeat orgs$214k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
14

Total granted

$132k
$184k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+28%

Still filing today

33%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON
    3× · 2018–2023 · $100k
  • TC
    TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $30k · revenue +13%
  • AB
    ALDELFA B CALLEJO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    2× · 2018–2021 · $2k

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF DALLAS
    one grant, 2022 · $70k
  • Southern Methodist Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +57%
  • TS
    THE SCOTT MURRAY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -83%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Girls Service League Inc
Philanthropy
2
Tex-E Inc
Education
3
Jolt Action Inc

We believe young Latinos will transform Texas through the power of their vote. We are harnessing the brilliance of our community and culture to build a generation of leaders that matches the urgency of our time.

Human Services
4
Greater Dallas Momentum Foundation
Community Improvement
5
Texas Executive Women

Organizations mission is to support programs that recognize, develop and fund the advancement of women and teenage girls in the community.

Education
6
North Texas Dream Team

Action and advocacy for daca

—
7
Latinas On the Plaza
—
8
Collin County Lulac Council 4537

Scholarships for Hispanic children and education of public to Hispanic issues.

Education
9
Aspiring Texas Latinos Achieving Success Together

La tiendita is a resource and empowerment center whose mission is to provide access to healthy and affordable food options and help latino students and others to graduate, attain secondary education and become leaders in their school and…

Community Improvement
10
North Texas Lulac District 3

LULAC The League of United Latin American Citizens www.lulac.org is the oldest and largest Hispanic civil rights organization in the country. LULAC advances the economic condition educational attainment political influence health and civil…

Civil Rights
11
Elevate Dallas

Building long-term, life-changing relationships with urban youth, equipping them to thrive and contribute to their community.

Education
12
Journey Forward Mentoring

Through the power of mentoring Journey Forward Mentoring inspires and guides students to excel in school progress in their careers and contribute to their communities.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ymca of Metropolitan Dallas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Poetic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTONCITY OF DALLAS: $69,747 · OtherCITY OF DALLASIMMSCHOOLS: $12,500 · OtherIMMSCHOOLSUNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS AT DALLAS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherLEADERSHIP COUNCIL ON LEGAL DIVERSI: $10,000 · Other+4 more: $7,200 · OtherTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · EducationTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITYSouthern Methodist University: $30,000 · EducationSouthern Methodist Universit…THE SCOTT MURRAY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationTHE SCOTT MURRAY SCHOLARSHIP…VOLAR: $7,500 · EducationVOLARYMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesWESLEY-RANKIN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesPOETIC: $5,000 · Human ServicesPRIMOS DALLAS: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentJOLT INITIATIVE: $3,000 · Civil RightsPROMISE HOUSE INC: $1,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$219,447Education$87,500Human Services$25,000Youth Development$10,000Civil Rights$3,000Housing & Shelter$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMMSCHOOLS: $12,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetYMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESLEY-RANKIN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPRIMOS DALLAS: $10,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetVOLAR: $7,500 over 1y, 13% of budgetPOETIC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJOLT INITIATIVE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPROMISE HOUSE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHISPANIC WOMENS NETWORK OF TEXAS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…The Dallas FoundationTexas Women's Foundat…The Addy FoundationUnited Way of Metropo…Texas Instruments Fou…The Blackbaud Giving …Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX25.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · The Addy Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Callejo-Botello Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Callejo-Botello Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Callejo-Botello Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Callejo-Botello Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Callejo-Botello’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home