Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Califonia State University East Bay Foundation Inc

Csu east bay foundation is an auxiliary organization of california state university east bay and the california state university system.

$12M
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$1.9M
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 79% of CALIFONIA STATE UNIVERSITY EAST BAY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 40 grants below total $9,008,573 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $11,553,125 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,544,552 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k12 grants · $386k
  • $50k–250k17 grants · $1.9M
  • $250k+11 grants · $6.7M
$88,835
Median grant
7
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAYWARD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT$1,949,210
CHABOT LAS POSITAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE$977,599
CITY OF HAYWARD$669,165
COMMUNITY CHILD CARE COORDINATING COUNCIL (4CS) OF ALAMEDA COUNTY$588,898
COMMUNITIES UNITED RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE$432,849
MISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY$418,037
EDEN AREA ROP$406,453
CONTRA COSTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE$389,995
LA FAMILIA COUNSELING SERVICES$345,739
TIBURCIO VASQUEZ HEALTH CENTER INC$298,232
HATCHUEL TABERNIK AND ASSOCIATES$257,000
ALAMEDA COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT$237,595
FRONTLINE CATALYSTS$227,559
EMPOWERMENT WORKS INC$201,109
UC BERKELEY$169,207
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $4.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EDEN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $204k → 10%EDEN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $187k → 10%EDEN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $158k → 10%EDEN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $140k → 10%EDEN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $136k → 10%EDEN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $85k → 10%EDEN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $83k → 10%EDEN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $32k → 10%COMMUNITY CHILD CARE COORDINATING COUNCIL (4CS) OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $589k → 10%COMMUNITY CHILD CARE COUNCIL (4CS) OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $507k → 10%COMMUNITY CHILD CARE COUNCIL (4CS) OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $486k → 10%COMMUNITY CHILD CARE COORDINATING COUNCIL OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $446k → 10%COMMUNITY CHILD CARE COUNCIL (4CS) OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $425k → 10%COMMUNITY CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $405k → 10%COMMUNITY CHILD CARE COUNCIL (4CS) OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $388k → 10%COMMUNITY CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $53k → 10%COMMUNITIES UNITED RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE: $433k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

OH
NJ
CA
UT
CO
KY
VA
MD
DE
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$42M · 46 repeat orgs$961k to everyone else

46 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
5

Total granted

$42M
$245k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+190%

Still filing today

46%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $716k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthEnvironmentInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    Community Child Care Coordinating Council of Alameda County
    8× · 2018–2025 · $3.3M · revenue +168%
  • TA
    The Alliance for Community Wellness DBA La Familia Counseling Services
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +201%
  • TIBURCIO VASQUEZ HEALTH CENTER INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • CS
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLANDS
    one grant, 2024 · $76k
  • CC
    CAMI CONSULTING INC
    one grant, 2023 · $66k
  • CS
    CAL STATE EAST BAY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $60k · revenue +190%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Califonia State University East Bay Foundation Inc

Csu east bay foundation is an auxiliary organization of california state university east bay and the california state university system. the organization's mission is to provide services that aid, supplement, and advance the educational…

Education
2
Foundation of California State University Monterey Bay

To further the scientific, literary, educational and charitable purposes of california state university, monterey bay, including fundraising, development, endowment management, financial assistance, public relations and other support.

Education
3
California State Student Association

CSSA as a student-led organization strives to improve the lives of California State University (CSU) students by advocating for student needs and engaging students in systemwide, state, and federal higher education policy making.

Education
4
California State University Alumni Association

Connect, engage and celebrate alumni, students and friends of sacramento state while building lifelong relationships that support the future of our university.

Education
5
The University Foundation At Sacramento State

Raise private resources to advance the mission and priorities of the university and serve as ambassadors in the community. provide stewardship in the prudent investment of resources and ensure the integrity of the foundation through…

Education
6
California State University Los Angeles Foundation

To advance the educational, cultural, scholarly, and creative activities and the role of community service of csula by increasing private funding, responsibly managing donated resources and supporting the university and its diverse and…

Education
7
Foundation for California Community Colleges

The foundation's mission is to benefit, support, and enhance the missions of the california community college system.

Education
8
University of California Student Association

The University of California Student Association (UCSA) is a coalition of students and student governments that aims to provide a collective voice for all students through advocacy and direct action. UCSA participates in the shared…

Education
9
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
10
Cal State Fullerton Philanthropic Foundation

To actively promote, pursue and steward private support for the advancement of california state university, fullerton.

Philanthropy
11
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
12
Cal State University Fullerton Alumni Association

To build lifelong alumni relationships by contributing to a positive csuf image, promoting university and alumni accomplishments, providing a network of opportunities to alumni interaction, and developing economic and social benefits for…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California State University Long Beach Research Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Alliance for Community Wellness Dba La Familia Counseling Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsCommunity College Foundatio…Immigrant Worker SupportYouth Mentoring ProgramsHealth Access Advocacy and …Independent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%8%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr17%12%20–35yr12%19%35–55yr12%42%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%4%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr17%4%20–35yr12%58%35–55yr12%28%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/57
the rest of the field
14%
13,850/98,812

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HAYWARD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT — $13,844,841 · OtherHAYWARD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTCHABOT LAS POSITAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $3,875,166 · OtherCHABOT LAS POSITAS COMMUNITY COLLEGEHATCHUEL TABERNIK AND ASSOCIATES — $1,947,500 · OtherHATCHUEL TABERNIK AND ASSOCIATESEDEN AREA ROP — $1,907,507 · OtherEDEN AREA ROPThe Alliance for Community Wellness DBA La Familia Counseling Services — $1,814,326 · OtherCITY OF HAYWARD — $1,614,921 · OtherAlameda County Board of Supervisors — $1,469,486 · OtherMISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY — $1,319,454 · OtherAGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE (USDA) — $1,205,071 · Other+31 more — $5,313,241 · Other+31 moreCommunity Child Care Coordinating Council of Alameda County — $3,298,596 · Human ServicesCommunity Ch…EDEN YOUTH & FAMILY CENTER — $1,023,886 · Human ServicesEDEN YOUTH &…COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE DBA CURYJ — $432,849 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITIES …TIBURCIO VASQUEZ HEALTH CENTER INC — $1,786,650 · HealthCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $525,340 · EducationSAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $299,832 · EducationUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation — $257,010 · EducationUNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES INC — $229,800 · EducationBay Area LEEDS — $115,420 · EducationCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FRESNO FOUNDATION — $61,610 · EducationCAL STATE EAST BAY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $60,000 · Education+3 more — $113,777 · EducationFrontline Catalysts — $380,505 · EnvironmentEmpowerment Works Inc — $269,639 · InternationalALAMEDA COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFFS ACTIVITIES LEAGUE INC — $172,520 · Youth Development
Other$34,311,513Human Services$4,755,331Health$1,786,650Education$1,662,789Environment$380,505International$269,639Youth Development$172,520

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCommunity Child Care Coordinating Council of Alameda County — $3,298,596 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetThe Alliance for Community Wellness DBA La Familia Counseling Services — $1,814,326 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetTIBURCIO VASQUEZ HEALTH CENTER INC — $1,786,650 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetMISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY — $1,319,454 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetEDEN YOUTH & FAMILY CENTER — $1,023,886 over 8y, 13% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $525,340 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE DBA CURYJ — $432,849 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetFrontline Catalysts — $380,505 over 2y, 37% of budgetSAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $299,832 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEmpowerment Works Inc — $269,639 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE — $263,585 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation — $257,010 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES INC — $229,800 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFFS ACTIVITIES LEAGUE INC — $172,520 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetBSCS SCIENCE LEARNING — $121,637 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBay Area LEEDS — $115,420 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $103,400 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTRELLIS — $103,277 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetCONTRA COSTA ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP INC — $67,581 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FRESNO FOUNDATION — $61,610 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAL STATE EAST BAY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCAL POLY HUMBOLDT SPONSORED PROGRAMS FOUNDATION — $55,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $46,277 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA COALITION FOR PUBLIC HIGHER EDUCATION — $12,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Community Child Care Coordinating Council of Alameda County
  • Who funds The Alliance for Community Wellness DBA La Familia Counseling Services
  • Who funds TIBURCIO VASQUEZ HEALTH CENTER INC
  • Who funds MISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
  • Who funds EDEN YOUTH & FAMILY CENTER
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH RESEARCH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE DBA CURYJ
  • Who funds Frontline Catalysts
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Empowerment Works Inc
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
  • Who funds University of Kentucky Research Foundation
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES INC
  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFFS ACTIVITIES LEAGUE INC
  • Who funds BSCS SCIENCE LEARNING
  • Who funds Bay Area LEEDS
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TRELLIS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for California Community CollegesCA29.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for California Community Colleges · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · East Bay Community Foundation · United Way of the Bay Area · The San Francisco Foundation · Sutter Bay Hospitals · Alameda County Community Food Bank · Fremont Bank Foundation · Community Initiatives · Tides Center · The California Wellness Foundation · Loved Twice

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Califonia State University East Bay Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • University of Delaware30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph