· Public charity
California Credit Union
A cooperative, organized for the purpose of promoting thrift and savings among its members, creating a source of credit for them at rates of interest set by the board of directors, and providing an opportunity for them to use and control their own money on a democratic basis in order to improve their economic and social conditions.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $48,680 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $123,409 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $74,729 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $29k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| USS MIDWAY MUSEUM | $17,500 |
| SAN DIEGO AIR & SPACE MUSEUM | $11,180 |
| SCRIPPS HOWARD FUND | $5,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SAN DIEGO | $5,000 |
| SAN DIEGO FLEET WEEK FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UMUSS MIDWAY MUSEUM8× · 2017–2024 · $138k · revenue +44%
- LALOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATION FOUNDATION2× · 2017–2018 · $119k · revenue ×77 · 32% of their budget
- GLGREATER LOS ANGELES EDUCATION FOUNDATION4× · 2017–2020 · $114k · revenue ×41
Funded once
- LALOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTone grant, 2019 · $121k
- WFWORLDWIDE FOUNDATION FOR CREDIT UNIONS INCone grant, 2022 · $28k · revenue -46%
- SDSAN DIEGO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTone grant, 2019 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.
The san diego municipal employees association (sdmea) is dedicated to being a strong and effective advocate for san diego city employees. sdmea is united to improve employees' standard of living and promote their fair treatment by…
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
The Santa Monica Education Foundation (SMEF) raises funds to enhance and supplement the curriculum of every public school in the city of Santa Monica.
To spark breakthrough community action that elevates every child and family toward a brighter future.
The Labor Council offers an avenue for local unions to come together as one group.
The el segundo education foundation represents a partnership of businesses, individuals and families organized to support and enhance programs of the el segundo unified school district and to promote excellence in education.
San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.
Santa Barbara Education Foundation (SBEF) provides and supports programs that enrich the academic, artistic, and personal development of all students in the Santa Barbara Unified School District.
To support the social, recreational, cultural and education programs and facilities, both on campus and in the community, and to advocate for student interests, provide leadership opportunities and participate in shared governance.
California education partners seeds and grows collaborations among california's school systems, so that they innovate, improve, and build internal capacity as learning organizations in order to close gaps and lead high performing,…
A not-for-profit credit union wholly owned by its members
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Orange County and the Inland Empire Inc and the most unlike its peers is United Teachers Educational Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 13% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds USS MIDWAY MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER LOS ANGELES EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds San Diego Fleet Week Foundation ↗
- Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
- Who funds GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CLASSROOM OF THE FUTURE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Boys to Men Mentoring Network Inc ↗
- Who funds SANTA CLARITA VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WORLDWIDE FOUNDATION FOR CREDIT UNIONS INC ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO AIR & SPACE MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED TEACHERS LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds PRO KIDS GOLF ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds THE LOS ANGELES DODGERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TRADERS4ACAUSE ↗
- Who funds SOILLE SAN DIEGO HEBREW DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Scripps Howard Fund ↗
- Who funds EASTLAKE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ORANGE COUNTY AND THE INLAND EMPIRE INC ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds San Diego Education Association ↗
- Who funds NAVY LEAGUE OF THE US SAN DIEGO COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds ASCENCIA ↗
- Who funds UNITED TEACHERS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds RICHARD MYLES JOHNSON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTH SHORE GIRLS SOFTBALL LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER SAN DIEGO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sempra Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The San Diego Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization California Credit Union funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.