· Public charity
Ca Broadband & Video Association
Leading advocate and voice for effective public policy to champion the value and importance of a dynamic and innovative industry that is changing the way californians live, work and connect.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $135,900 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $181,816 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $45,916 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $46k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS POLICY INSTITUTE | $60,000 |
| CITY OF GARDENA JAZZ FESTIVAL | $15,000 |
| BREAKFAST MEDIA LLC | $15,000 |
| GOD'S PANTRY | $8,000 |
| FILIPINO YOUTH LEADERSHIP PROGRAM | $7,900 |
| SEVENTH GENERATION ADVISORS | $5,000 |
| BLACK INDIGENOUS WOMEN OF COLOR | $5,000 |
| THE CENTER FOR FINANCIAL EMPOWERMENT | $5,000 |
| ASIAN AMERICAN PACIFIC ISLANDER LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS | $5,000 |
| RIVER CATS FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD AFFILIATES OF CALIFORNIA | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +186% since the first grant, against -40% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTHE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS POLICY INSTITUTE8× · 2017–2024 · $210k · revenue +59%
- FFFOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA'S TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION ECONOMY4× · 2018–2021 · $75k · revenue +206% · 40% of their budget
- LLLATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION3× · 2017–2021 · $30k · revenue +262%
Funded once
- CBCalifornia Border Issues Projectone grant, 2023 · $25k
- CHCALIFORNIA HAWAII STATE CONFERENCEone grant, 2023 · $10k
- FCFUNDAMENTAL CHANGEone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -74%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The purpose of the organization is to empower Latina/os in California through education, leadership development, and civic engagement, ensuring that they have the tools and resources to lead successful lives and make a positive impact in…
California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…
To promote hispanic business, create an atmosphere that encourages the growth of the hispanic business community and to act as an advocate for the hispanic business community.
Cfc advocates for the rights of california consumers on a broad range of consumer issues.
An alliance of community based organizations to engage, educate and motivate california's electorate.
The Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE) Action is a grassroots, member-led, statewide community organization working with more than 16,000 members in six counties across California, dedicated to raising the voices of…
To promote social welfare by providing a forum to discuss, educate the public, and advance programs that promote topical issues of interest to the jewish community in california. the foundation will promote an understanding of cultural,…
Support issues that reduce and eliminate structural barriers to social and economic opportunities for poor and economically disadvantaged communities and communities of color in california.
Educate and advocacy
Economic development of the latino community
Promote social welfare thru political policy
To support policies and ballot measures to curb increases in taxes throughout the state of California, including the qualification and passage of a proposed statewide initiative relating to the imposition of taxes and fees (California…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Gods Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS POLICY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA'S TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION ECONOMY ↗
- Who funds LATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHARITABLE FUND BENEFITTING GARDENA ↗
- Who funds California Border Issues Project ↗
- Who funds Women in California Leadership Inc ↗
- Who funds ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ANAHUAK YOUTH SPORTS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE ↗
- Who funds GODS PANTRY ↗
- Who funds FILIPINO YOUTH LEADERSHIP PROGRAM ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds THE CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR CIVIC PARTICIPATION ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR FINANCIAL EMPOWERMENT ↗
- Who funds RIVER CATS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD AFFILIATES OF CALIFORNIA INC ↗
- Who funds SEVENTH GENERATION ADVISORS ↗
- Who funds LTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc · California Chamber of Commerce · California Charter Schools Association · California Fire Foundation · California Association of Hospitals and Health Systems · United Domestic Workers of America · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ca Broadband & Video Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.