Skip to content

· Public charity

California Association of Dui Treatment Programs

CADTP is a pro-active organization which seeks to promote understanding, improvement and at times preservation of driving under the influence programs in California.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
31
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$4.8MHuman Services$1.1MPublic Safety & Disaster$843kCrime & Legal$733kEducation$602kPublic Benefit$482kCommunity Improvement$465kYouth Development$354kOther$0
02FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 31 grants below total $1,335,714, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,573,919 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $238,205 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k25 grants · $811k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $524k
$24,967
Median grant
1
States reached
$646k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
A Better Citizen Foundation$99,867
BHS$99,867
The High Road Program$99,867
School Ten Inc$74,899
Safety Education Center Inc$74,899
Safety Consultant Services Inc$74,899
Korean Community Services$49,933
ABC Traffic Programs$49,933
Fred Kennedy Associates$49,933
Prevention Education Programs$49,933
The Awareness Program$49,933
Riverside Recovery Resouces$49,933
Lake County DDP$49,933
Granite Wellness Centers$49,933
Service First of Northern California$24,967
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $481k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%Bi-Bett: $79k → 9%Bi-Bett: $64k → 9%Bi-Bett: $50k → 9%Bi-Bett: $25k → 9%ECS ACCORD: $100k → 11%ECS Accord: $62k → 11%ECS Accord: $32k → 11%ECS Accord: $25k → 11%ECS Accord: $25k → 11%ECS ACCORD: $19k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10.0M · 38 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

38 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
1

Total granted

$10.0M
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+104%

Still filing today

55%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthCrime & LegalHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $576k · revenue +242%
  • GW
    GRANITE WELLNESS CENTERS
    6× · 2019–2024 · $473k · revenue +24%
  • SE
    SAFETY EDUCATION CENTER INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $450k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • AXIS COMMUNITY HEALTH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $38k · revenue +104%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sun Street Centers

To prevent alcohol and drug addiction by offering education, prevention and recovery to individuals and families, regardless of income level.

Human Services
2
Phoenix Counseling Center Inc

Conducted drug and alcohol counseling programs serving Southern Oregon including court-mandated DUI programs.

Health
3
Southwest Chemical Dependency

Southwest Chemical Dependency's mission is to promote the health and general well-being of individuals, families and communities impacted by the abuse of alcohol and other drugs as well as co-occurring mental health issues

Health
4
Rio Grande Alcoholism Treatment Program

Provide substance abuse treatment, behavioral health services, and access to supportive services, in order to enable men and women to live productive, drug-free lives.

Health
5
Mountain High Recovery Center

Mountain High Recovery Center is a substance use treatment facility whose mission is to provide local, quality, and affordable recovery services to individuals and families in the South Lake Tahoe, CA community.

Health
6
Inland Behavioral & Health Services Inc

IBHS is dedicated to helping the community achieve and maintain general good health, education and welfare through commitment in providing excellent service in the areas of physical health care, substance abuse treatment, mental health…

Health
7
Cri-Help Inc

Substance use disorder treatment

—
8
Bakersfield Recovery Services

Provide residential and outpatient treatment for drug and alcohol abuse.

Health
9
Valley Health Associates

Providing the highest quality substance use disorder services for youth and adults in Monterey and San Benito Counties.

Philanthropy
10
Latino Commission On Alcohol and Drug Abuse Services

The Latino Commission provides a multitude of services throughout the counties of San Francisco, San Mateo, and Tulare. The Organization currently employs twelve programs eight for adults, and four for youth and transitional age youth…

Health
11
Tarzana Treatment Centers Inc

Tarzana treatment centers' (ttc) mission is to provide high quality, integrated health care that improves the quality of life and health of patients regardless of financial resources, and contributes to a reduction in the total cost of…

Health
12
Healthright 360

To give hope and change lives. we do this by offering a continuum of prevention, intervention, behavioral health and wellness services to adults and families throughout california. these services aim to reduce costs of societal problems by…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Council On Alcoholism & Drug Dependence; the most unlike its peers is Riverside Recovery Resources. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ABC Traffice Programs: $877,407 · OtherABC Traffice ProgramsSchool Ten Inc: $515,004 · OtherSchool Ten IncSafety Consultant Services Inc: $493,342 · OtherSafety Consultant Services IncSAFETY EDUCATION CENTER INC: $449,987 · OtherSAFETY EDUCATION CENTER INCThe Awareness Program: $363,121 · OtherThe Awareness ProgramOHS - SAN MARCOS: $358,266 · OtherOHS - SAN MARCOSPrevention Education Programs: $347,925 · OtherPrevention Education ProgramsA Better Citizen Foundation: $299,600 · OtherA Better Citizen FoundationSOLUTIONS FOR POSITIVE CHOICE: $285,783 · OtherKings View Community Services: $239,073 · OtherCounty Of Lake: $214,000 · OtherCOUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO: $207,638 · Other+7 more: $723,965 · Other+7 moreKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $575,719 · HealthKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES IN…GRANITE WELLNESS CENTERS: $472,861 · HealthGRANITE WELLNESS CENTERSBEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $374,583 · HealthBEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES I…Riverside Recovery Resources: $300,204 · HealthRiverside Recovery ResourcesNORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION: $283,974 · HealthNORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORP…BRIDGES PROFESSIONAL TREATMENT SERVICES: $182,910 · HealthBRIDGES PROFESSIONAL TREATME…+5 more: $300,954 · Health+5 moreTHE HIGH ROAD PROGRAM: $736,025 · Crime & LegalTHE HIGH ROAD …ZONA SECA INC: $290,980 · Crime & LegalZONA SECA INCNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM & DRUG DEPENDENCE: $150,404 · Crime & LegalNATIONAL COUNC…HARBOR AREA HIGH GAIN PROGRAM INC: $74,900 · Crime & LegalHARBOR AREA HI…SPECIAL TREATMENT EDUCATION & PREVENTION SERVICES INC: $47,850 · Crime & LegalEpiscopal Community Services: $262,719 · Human ServicesBI-BETT: $217,998 · Human ServicesSERVICE FIRST OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $74,900 · Human ServicesSAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $286,095 · Education
Other$5,375,111Health$2,491,205Crime & Legal$1,300,159Human Services$555,617Education$286,095

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HIGH ROAD PROGRAM: $736,025 over 6y, 7.8% of budgetKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $575,719 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetGRANITE WELLNESS CENTERS: $472,861 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetSAFETY EDUCATION CENTER INC: $449,987 over 4y, 17% of budgetBEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $374,583 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetRiverside Recovery Resources: $300,204 over 4y, 8.6% of budgetZONA SECA INC: $290,980 over 6y, 10% of budgetSAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $286,095 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION: $283,974 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEpiscopal Community Services: $262,719 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBI-BETT: $217,998 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetBRIDGES PROFESSIONAL TREATMENT SERVICES: $182,910 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM & DRUG DEPENDENCE: $150,404 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetFRED KENNEDY ASSOCIATES INC: $149,800 over 2y, 12% of budgetSouthern California Alcohol and Drug Programs Inc: $74,900 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetALTERNATIVES FOR BETTER LIVING: $74,900 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetSERVICE FIRST OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $74,900 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHARBOR AREA HIGH GAIN PROGRAM INC: $74,900 over 2y, 14% of budgetJANUS OF SANTA CRUZ: $61,977 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBAY AREA COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $50,843 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL TREATMENT EDUCATION & PREVENTION SERVICES INC: $47,850 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetAXIS COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $38,334 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HIGH ROAD PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds GRANITE WELLNESS CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds SAFETY EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Riverside Recovery Resources ↗
  • Who funds ZONA SECA INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Episcopal Community Services ↗
  • Who funds BI-BETT ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES PROFESSIONAL TREATMENT SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM & DRUG DEPENDENCE ↗
  • Who funds FRED KENNEDY ASSOCIATES INC ↗
  • Who funds Southern California Alcohol and Drug Programs Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALTERNATIVES FOR BETTER LIVING ↗
  • Who funds SERVICE FIRST OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds HARBOR AREA HIGH GAIN PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds JANUS OF SANTA CRUZ ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL TREATMENT EDUCATION & PREVENTION SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds AXIS COMMUNITY HEALTH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCA14.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Direct Relief · Tides Center · California Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization California Association of Dui Treatment Programs funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from California Association of Dui Treatment Programs. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to California Association of Dui Treatment Programs?

    Find your warmest path to California Association of Dui Treatment Programs through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on California Association of Dui Treatment Programs’ filings →

    More from the funding graph