· Public charity
California Association of Dui Treatment Programs
CADTP is a pro-active organization which seeks to promote understanding, improvement and at times preservation of driving under the influence programs in California.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 31 grants below total $1,335,714 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,573,919 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $238,205 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k25 grants · $811k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $524k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| The High Road Program | $99,867 |
| BHS | $99,867 |
| A Better Citizen Foundation | $99,867 |
| Safety Consultant Services Inc | $74,899 |
| Safety Education Center Inc | $74,899 |
| School Ten Inc | $74,899 |
| Fred Kennedy Associates | $49,933 |
| Korean Community Services | $49,933 |
| ABC Traffic Programs | $49,933 |
| The Awareness Program | $49,933 |
| Riverside Recovery Resouces | $49,933 |
| Granite Wellness Centers | $49,933 |
| Prevention Education Programs | $49,933 |
| Lake County DDP | $49,933 |
| Wright Education Services | $24,967 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $481k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
38 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KCKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC6× · 2019–2024 · $576k · revenue +242%
- GWGRANITE WELLNESS CENTERS6× · 2019–2024 · $473k · revenue +24%
- SESAFETY EDUCATION CENTER INC4× · 2021–2024 · $450k · revenue +20%
Funded once
AXIS COMMUNITY HEALTH INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $38k · revenue +104%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To prevent alcohol and drug addiction by offering education, prevention and recovery to individuals and families, regardless of income level.
Conducted drug and alcohol counseling programs serving Southern Oregon including court-mandated DUI programs.
Southwest Chemical Dependency's mission is to promote the health and general well-being of individuals, families and communities impacted by the abuse of alcohol and other drugs as well as co-occurring mental health issues
Provide substance abuse treatment, behavioral health services, and access to supportive services, in order to enable men and women to live productive, drug-free lives.
Mountain High Recovery Center is a substance use treatment facility whose mission is to provide local, quality, and affordable recovery services to individuals and families in the South Lake Tahoe, CA community.
IBHS is dedicated to helping the community achieve and maintain general good health, education and welfare through commitment in providing excellent service in the areas of physical health care, substance abuse treatment, mental health…
Substance use disorder treatment
Provide residential and outpatient treatment for drug and alcohol abuse.
Providing the highest quality substance use disorder services for youth and adults in Monterey and San Benito Counties.
The Latino Commission provides a multitude of services throughout the counties of San Francisco, San Mateo, and Tulare. The Organization currently employs twelve programs eight for adults, and four for youth and transitional age youth…
Tarzana treatment centers' (ttc) mission is to provide high quality, integrated health care that improves the quality of life and health of patients regardless of financial resources, and contributes to a reduction in the total cost of…
To give hope and change lives. we do this by offering a continuum of prevention, intervention, behavioral health and wellness services to adults and families throughout california. these services aim to reduce costs of societal problems by…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Council On Alcoholism & Drug Dependence and the most unlike its peers is Riverside Recovery Resources. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE HIGH ROAD PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds GRANITE WELLNESS CENTERS ↗
- Who funds SAFETY EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Riverside Recovery Resources ↗
- Who funds ZONA SECA INC ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Episcopal Community Services ↗
- Who funds BI-BETT ↗
- Who funds BRIDGES PROFESSIONAL TREATMENT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM & DRUG DEPENDENCE ↗
- Who funds FRED KENNEDY ASSOCIATES INC ↗
- Who funds Southern California Alcohol and Drug Programs Inc ↗
- Who funds HARBOR AREA HIGH GAIN PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds SERVICE FIRST OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds ALTERNATIVES FOR BETTER LIVING ↗
- Who funds JANUS OF SANTA CRUZ ↗
- Who funds BAY AREA COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL TREATMENT EDUCATION & PREVENTION SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds AXIS COMMUNITY HEALTH INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Direct Relief · Tides Center · California Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization California Association of Dui Treatment Programs funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to California Association of Dui Treatment Programs?
Find your warmest path to California Association of Dui Treatment Programs through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.