Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cal Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$466k
Granted FY2025still arriving
47
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.4MAnimals$1.0MReligion$654kFood & Nutrition$246kHuman Services$168kEmployment$132kHealth$122kEnvironment$110kOther$0
02FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k33 grants · $86k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $170k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $210k
$3,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HALCYON FOUNDATION$110,000
VERMONT STUDIO SCHOOL$50,000
TWO MAUDS$50,000
SCHWARTZMAN ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER$30,000
HEART OF THE HAMPTONS$22,000
SOUTHAMPTON ANIMAL SHELTER FDN$20,000
FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY$20,000
PARRISH ART MUSEUM$15,000
EVELYN ALEXANDER WILDLIFE RESCUE CENTER$12,500
CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR CHILDREN$10,000
MADOO GARDEN CONSERVANCY$10,000
ANIMAL RESCUE FUND$10,000
ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER$10,000
NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART$10,000
CITY HARVEST$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $76k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOTTOMLESS CLOSET: $10k → 17%BOTTOMLESS CLOSET: $7k → 17%BOTTOMLESS CLOSET: $5k → 17%BOTTOMLESS CLOSET: $5k → 17%BOTTOMLESS CLOSET: $5k → 17%BOTTOMLESS CLOSET: $5k → 17%BOTTOMLESS CLOSET: $5k → 17%BOTTOMLESS CLOSET: $5k → 17%BOTTOMLESS CLOSET: $5k → 17%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY: $4k → 17%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY: $4k → 17%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY: $3k → 17%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY: $3k → 17%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY: $2k → 17%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY: $2k → 17%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY: $2k → 17%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY: $2k → 17%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
NY
MA
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
SC
DC
MS
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.1M · 68 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

68 repeat relationships: 45 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

68
8

Total granted

$4.1M
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+17%

Still filing today

59%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureEnvironmentFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HALCYON FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $770k · revenue +121%
  • TM
    TWO MAUDS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $630k · revenue +50%
  • TA
    THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $326k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • AR
    ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • KB
    Kips Bay Boys & Girls Club
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +17%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Thompson Park Conservancy Inc

Zoo new york, by example and action, provides knowledge and motivation for conserving nature in new york state through science-based natural and cultural experiences.

Arts & Culture
2
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
3
Natural Areas Conservancy Inc

The natural areas conservancy champions urban natural areas in new york city and across the nation through innovative research, partnerships, and advocacy. we increase the health and resilience of urban forests and wetlands, catalyze…

Environment
4
New York City Bird Alliance Inc

Nyc bird alliance is a grassroots community that protects wild birds and habitat in the five boroughs, improving the quality of life for all new yorkers.

Environment
5
Hudson Yards Development Corporation

See schedule oto coordinate and facilitate the economic development of the hudson yards area of manhattan. this includes construction of an extension to the no. subway line, the coordination of the design and construction of certain public…

Community Improvement
6
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
7
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
8
New York City Center Inc

The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…

Arts & Culture
9
Wild Bird Fund Inc

Wild bird fund is a 501(c)(3) organization that cares for the injured, ill and orphaned wild life of new york city. our mission is to provide veterinary care and rehabilitation to native and migrant wildlife and to educate new yorkers…

Animals
10
New York Landmarks Conservancy Inc

The conservancy preserves and revitalizes new york's architecture. by doing so, it contributes to new york's economy, tourism and quality of life.

—
11
Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp

To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunities for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.

Community Improvement
12
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Restoration Project; the most unlike its peers is Two Mauds Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/46
Grantees still filing
34/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TWO MAUDS INC: $630,000 · OtherTWO MAUDS INCVERMONT STUDIO SCHOOL: $330,000 · OtherVERMONT STUDIO SCHOOLANIMAL RESCUE FUND: $130,000 · OtherANIMAL RESCUE FUNDSCHWARTZMAN ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $80,000 · OtherHUMAN RESOURCES OF THE HAMPTONS: $76,000 · Other+47 more: $631,000 · Other+47 moreHALCYON FOUNDATION: $770,000 · Arts & CultureHALCYON FOUNDATIONTHE PARRISH ART MUSEUM INC: $132,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PARRISH ART MUSEUM INCNational Gallery of Art: $70,000 · Arts & CultureNational Gallery of ArtNATIONAL THEATRE IN AMERICA INC: $50,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $24,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $326,000 · AnimalsTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL …THE SOUTHAMPTON ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INC: $160,000 · AnimalsTHE SOUTHAMPTON ANI…Evelyn Alexander Wildlife Rescue Center Inc: $132,500 · AnimalsEvelyn Alexander Wi…+8 more: $93,000 · Animals+8 moreFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $165,000 · Community ImprovementSOUTHAMPTON ASSOCIATION INC: $34,500 · Community ImprovementHEART OF THE HAMPTONS LTD: $79,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC: $35,500 · Food & NutritionGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $18,000 · Food & NutritionCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $18,000 · Food & NutritionTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND: $90,000 · PhilanthropyBOTTOMLESS CLOSET: $52,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $24,000 · Human Services
Other$1,877,000Arts & Culture$1,046,000Animals$711,500Community Improvement$199,500Food & Nutrition$150,500Philanthropy$90,000Human Services$76,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHALCYON FOUNDATION: $770,000 over 9y, 13% of budgetTWO MAUDS INC: $630,000 over 9y, 23% of budgetTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $326,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $165,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOUTHAMPTON ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INC: $160,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetEvelyn Alexander Wildlife Rescue Center Inc: $132,500 over 9y, 3.6% of budgetTHE PARRISH ART MUSEUM INC: $132,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND: $90,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHEART OF THE HAMPTONS LTD: $79,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetNational Gallery of Art: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBOTTOMLESS CLOSET: $52,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL THEATRE IN AMERICA INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $35,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHAMPTON ASSOCIATION INC: $34,500 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR CHILDREN OF NEW YORK INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $24,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NATIONAL THEATRE FOUNDATION: $19,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $18,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $18,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $18,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $18,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $18,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK EDGE INC: $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD HUDSON PECONIC INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFoxcroft School: $14,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKips Bay Boys & Girls Club: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGAY MEN'S HEALTH CRISIS INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PRIMATE PROTECTION LEAGUE: $9,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBIDEAWEE INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWINGS OF RESCUE INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGROUP FOR THE EAST END INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetINTERFAITH CENTER OF NEW YORK INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFetch Cares: $5,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget564 PARK AVENUE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE RED SCHOOL HOUSE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HALCYON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TWO MAUDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds THE SOUTHAMPTON ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Evelyn Alexander Wildlife Rescue Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE PARRISH ART MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF THE HAMPTONS LTD ↗
  • Who funds National Gallery of Art ↗
  • Who funds BOTTOMLESS CLOSET ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL THEATRE IN AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHAMPTON ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR CHILDREN OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL THEATRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
  • Who funds FRESH AIR FUND ↗
  • Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The New York Community TrustNY18.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Joseph & Sylvia Slifka Foundation Inc · The Hilaria and Alec Baldwin Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Chicago Community Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cal Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cal Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cal Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Cal Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cal’s filings →

    More from the funding graph