Skip to content
Cabbage Hill Farm Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Cabbage Hill Farm Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$588k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$418kAnimals$126kEnvironment$80kYouth Development$50kCommunity Improvement$45kHuman Services$18kInternational$10kEmployment$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $220k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $350k
$15,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUL FIRE FARM$50,000
FARMS TO GROW$50,000
AGRARIA CENTER FOR REGENERATIVE PRACTICE$50,000
RODALE INSTITUTE$50,000
RETHINK FOOD$50,000
DRIVE CHANGE$50,000
THE FARMLINK PROJECT$50,000
LIVESTOCK CONSERVENCY$25,000
RAFI - RURAL ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION$25,000
NATIONAL YOUNG FARMERS COALITION$25,000
ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK$25,000
GOOD WORK INSTITUTE FOR THE BENEFIT OF ROCK STEADY FARMS$25,000
FARMER VETERAN COALITION$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
NEIGHBORS LINK$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE FARMLINK PROJECT: $50k → 14%TOGETHER WE BAKE: $5k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK: $10k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK: $1k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $494 → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $348 → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $282 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
VA
NM
AR
NC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$198k · 9 repeat orgs$562k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +75% since the first grant, against +56% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
9

Total granted

$198k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+56%

Still filing today

78%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $548k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthEducationEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LIVESTOCK CONSERVANCY INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $125k · revenue +81%
  • NL
    NEIGHBORS LINK CORP
    5× · 2017–2024 · $13k · revenue +297%
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $5k · revenue +276%

Funded once

  • CC
    COMMUNITY CENTER NO WESTCHESTER
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +56%
  • W
    WESLAND
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Field & Fork Network

Field & fork network connects communities to innovative solutions that foster a sustainable food system. the 4 areas of focus include: food access, agriculture economic development, youth development and healthy neighborhoods.

—
2
Farm Training Collective Nyc Inc

The goal of Farm School NYC is to train the next generation of farmers in New York City and beyond, with a focus on limited resourced and socially disadvantaged individuals and communities, and to increase access to healthy, local food in…

Education
3
All Farmers Inc

We envision a food system that reflects the diverse communities of our region in leadership, ownership, and priorities. all farmers lowers barriers to enable refugee and immigrant farmers to grow resilient community farms through access to…

Food & Nutrition
4
East End Food Institute

East End Food is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to support, promote and advocate for farmers and producers, while ensuring everyone in the community can enjoy and be nourished by local food. We envision the East End of Long…

Food & Nutrition
5
Gorge Grown Food Network

To build access to locally grown food and support local farmers.

Food & Nutrition
6
Northeast Organic Farming Association of Vermont

The northeast organic farming association of vermont promotes organic practices to build an ecomnomically viable, ecologically sound and socially just vermont agricultural system that benefits all living things.

Arts & Culture
7
Development in Gardening

Development in Gardening is improving the nutrition and livelihoods of some of the world's most uniquely marginalized people by teaching them to plant regenerative gardens that grow health, wealth, and a sense of belonging.

Community Improvement
8
Food Action

Our mission is to educate, organize and advocate for food and farming systems to become economically prosperous, ecologically sound and socially equitable.

—
9
Fair Food Network Inc

Fair food network is organized to grow community health, wealth, and resilience through food, to increase access to affordable healthy food, help local food economies thrive and build resilience in local food and agriculture systems.

Food & Nutrition
10
Nashville Food Project Inc

The nashville food project brings people together to grow, cook, and share nourishing food, with the goals of cultivating community and alleviating hunger in our city.

Food & Nutrition
11
The Farm Collaborative

Growing a local food system where the health of people and planet come first

Education
12
Farmer Foodshare Inc

Our mission is to increase access to fresh, local food for all while supporting the viability of marginalized farmers to create a more equitable food system.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Soul Fire Farm Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is River Valley Arts Collective Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
14/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE LIVESTOCK CONSERVANCY INC: $125,000 · Food & NutritionTHE LIVESTOCK CONSERVANCY INCRodale Institute: $50,000 · Food & NutritionRodale InstituteSOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC: $50,000 · Food & NutritionSOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INCNATIONAL YOUNG FARMERS COALITION INC: $25,000 · Food & NutritionNATIONAL YOUNG FARMERS COALITION INCROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC: $25,000 · Food & NutritionROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INCFARMER VETERAN COALITION: $15,000 · Food & Nutrition+2 more: $10,772 · Food & NutritionRETHINK FOOD: $50,000 · OtherRETHINK FOODAGRARIA CENTER FOR REGENERATIVE PRACTICE: $50,000 · OtherAGRARIA CENTER FOR REGENERATIVE PRAC…RAFI - RURAL ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherRAFI - RURAL ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATIONGOOD WORK INSTITUTE FOR THE BENEFIT OF ROCK STEADY FARMS: $25,000 · OtherGOOD WORK INSTITUTE FOR THE BENEFIT …HEIFER INTERNATIONAL USA PROJECTS: $15,000 · OtherHEIFER INTERNATIONAL USA PROJECTSMT KISCO DAY CARE: $10,000 · OtherMCENROE MODEL ORGANIC FARM: $10,000 · OtherGAINING GROUND INC: $10,000 · OtherSOUTHWEST GA PROJECT FOR COMMUNITY EDUCATION INC: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · Other+14 more: $28,252 · Other+14 moreFARMLINK PROJECT: $50,000 · Human ServicesFARMLINK P…NEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $12,510 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORS …Together We Bake: $5,000 · Human ServicesTogether W…Farms to Grow Inc: $50,000 · EducationDRIVE CHANGE INC: $50,000 · EmploymentGROUNDWORK HUDSON VALLEY INC: $35,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MOUNT KISCO INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC: $3,382 · PhilanthropyGLYNWOOD CENTER INC: $10,000 · Public Benefit
Food & Nutrition$300,772Other$243,252Human Services$67,510Education$50,000Employment$50,000Philanthropy$38,382Public Benefit$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE LIVESTOCK CONSERVANCY INC: $125,000 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetRodale Institute: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFarms to Grow Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetDRIVE CHANGE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFARMLINK PROJECT: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGROUNDWORK HUDSON VALLEY INC: $35,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL YOUNG FARMERS COALITION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFARMER VETERAN COALITION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $12,510 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGLYNWOOD CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGAINING GROUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL BLACK FARMERS ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSOUTHWEST GA PROJECT FOR COMMUNITY EDUCATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER INC: $5,105 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTogether We Bake: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE MOUNT KISCO INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC: $3,382 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC: $2,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEDFORD 2030 INC: $2,023 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC: $855 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDIG FARM INC: $772 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetRIVER VALLEY ARTS COLLECTIVE INC: $522 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCEREBRAL PALSY OF WESTCHESTER INC: $230 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Louis and Anne Abrons…American Farmland Tru…United Way of Westche…Peckham Family Founda…Clif Family FoundationRsf Social Finance IncThe New York Communit…Jewish Communal FundThe Bank of America C…Network for GoodVanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…
Louis and Anne Abrons Foundation IncDE13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Louis and Anne Abrons Foundation Inc · American Farmland Trust · United Way of Westchester and Putnam · Peckham Family Foundation · Clif Family Foundation · Rsf Social Finance Inc · The New York Community Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cabbage Hill Farm Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cabbage Hill Farm Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Gaining Ground Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Cabbage Hill Farm Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Cabbage Hill Farm Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cabbage Hill Farm’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home