· Private foundation
Cabbage Hill Farm Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $220k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $350k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DRIVE CHANGE | $50,000 |
| RODALE INSTITUTE | $50,000 |
| SOUL FIRE FARM | $50,000 |
| AGRARIA CENTER FOR REGENERATIVE PRACTICE | $50,000 |
| FARMS TO GROW | $50,000 |
| THE FARMLINK PROJECT | $50,000 |
| RETHINK FOOD | $50,000 |
| ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK | $25,000 |
| RAFI - RURAL ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| LIVESTOCK CONSERVENCY | $25,000 |
| GOOD WORK INSTITUTE FOR THE BENEFIT OF ROCK STEADY FARMS | $25,000 |
| NATIONAL YOUNG FARMERS COALITION | $25,000 |
| FARMER VETERAN COALITION | $15,000 |
| MT KISCO DAY CARE | $10,000 |
| MCENROE MODEL ORGANIC FARM | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +75% since the first grant, against +55% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $548k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TLTHE LIVESTOCK CONSERVANCY INC7× · 2017–2024 · $125k · revenue +81%
- NLNEIGHBORS LINK CORP5× · 2017–2024 · $13k · revenue +274%
- CCCOMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER INC4× · 2018–2021 · $5k · revenue +276%
Funded once
- CCCOMMUNITY CENTER NO WESTCHESTERone grant, 2023 · $4k
- TCTHE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +55%
- WWESLANDone grant, 2023 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Field & fork network connects communities to innovative solutions that foster a sustainable food system. the 4 areas of focus include: food access, agriculture economic development, youth development and healthy neighborhoods.
The goal of Farm School NYC is to train the next generation of farmers in New York City and beyond, with a focus on limited resourced and socially disadvantaged individuals and communities, and to increase access to healthy, local food in…
We envision a food system that reflects the diverse communities of our region in leadership, ownership, and priorities. all farmers lowers barriers to enable refugee and immigrant farmers to grow resilient community farms through access to…
East End Food is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to support, promote and advocate for farmers and producers, while ensuring everyone in the community can enjoy and be nourished by local food. We envision the East End of Long…
To build access to locally grown food and support local farmers.
The northeast organic farming association of vermont promotes organic practices to build an ecomnomically viable, ecologically sound and socially just vermont agricultural system that benefits all living things.
Development in Gardening is improving the nutrition and livelihoods of some of the world's most uniquely marginalized people by teaching them to plant regenerative gardens that grow health, wealth, and a sense of belonging.
Our mission is to educate, organize and advocate for food and farming systems to become economically prosperous, ecologically sound and socially equitable.
Fair food network is organized to grow community health, wealth, and resilience through food, to increase access to affordable healthy food, help local food economies thrive and build resilience in local food and agriculture systems.
The nashville food project brings people together to grow, cook, and share nourishing food, with the goals of cultivating community and alleviating hunger in our city.
Growing a local food system where the health of people and planet come first
Our mission is to increase access to fresh, local food for all while supporting the viability of marginalized farmers to create a more equitable food system.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Soul Fire Farm Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is River Valley Arts Collective Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE LIVESTOCK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds DRIVE CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds FARMLINK PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Farms to Grow Inc ↗
- Who funds Rodale Institute ↗
- Who funds SOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds GROUNDWORK HUDSON VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL YOUNG FARMERS COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds FARMER VETERAN COALITION ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORS LINK CORP ↗
- Who funds GLYNWOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GAINING GROUND INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST GA PROJECT FOR COMMUNITY EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BLACK FARMERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds Together We Bake ↗
- Who funds THE MOUNT KISCO INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC ↗
- Who funds BEDFORD 2030 INC ↗
- Who funds WOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DIG FARM INC ↗
- Who funds RIVER VALLEY ARTS COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds CEREBRAL PALSY OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Louis and Anne Abrons Foundation Inc · American Farmland Trust · United Way of Westchester and Putnam · Peckham Family Foundation · Clif Family Foundation · Rsf Social Finance Inc · The New York Community Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cabbage Hill Farm Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Gaining Ground Inc — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Cabbage Hill Farm Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Cabbage Hill Farm Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.