Skip to content
Ca Broadband & Video Association at a glance

· Public charity

Ca Broadband & Video Association

Leading advocate and voice for effective public policy to champion the value and importance of a dynamic and innovative industry that is changing the way californians live, work and connect.

$182k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Civil Rights$270kScience & Tech$75kArts & Culture$40kPublic Benefit$38kCommunity Improvement$28kEducation$20kYouth Development$15kHealth$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $135,900, the rows itemized in this filing. The $181,816 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $45,916 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS POLICY INSTITUTE$60,000
CITY OF GARDENA JAZZ FESTIVAL$15,000
BREAKFAST MEDIA LLC$15,000
GOD'S PANTRY$8,000
FILIPINO YOUTH LEADERSHIP PROGRAM$7,900
ASIAN AMERICAN PACIFIC ISLANDER LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS$5,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD AFFILIATES OF CALIFORNIA$5,000
SEVENTH GENERATION ADVISORS$5,000
BLACK INDIGENOUS WOMEN OF COLOR$5,000
THE CENTER FOR FINANCIAL EMPOWERMENT$5,000
RIVER CATS FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE CENTER FOR FINANCIAL EMPOWERMENT: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$410k · 8 repeat orgs$113k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +186% since the first grant, against -40% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$410k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+186%
-40%

Still filing today

88%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyCivil RightsEducationPublic BenefitHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS POLICY INSTITUTE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $210k · revenue +59%
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA'S TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION ECONOMY
    4× · 2018–2021 · $75k · revenue +206% · 40% of their budget
  • LL
    LATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2021 · $30k · revenue +262%

Funded once

  • CB
    California Border Issues Project
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • CH
    CALIFORNIA HAWAII STATE CONFERENCE
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • FC
    FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -74%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Lulac Foundation Inc

The purpose of the organization is to empower Latina/os in California through education, leadership development, and civic engagement, ensuring that they have the tools and resources to lead successful lives and make a positive impact in…

—
2
California Donor Table

California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…

Civil Rights
3
California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce

To promote hispanic business, create an atmosphere that encourages the growth of the hispanic business community and to act as an advocate for the hispanic business community.

—
4
Consumer Federation of California

Cfc advocates for the rights of california consumers on a broad range of consumer issues.

Public Benefit
5
California Calls Action Fund

An alliance of community based organizations to engage, educate and motivate california's electorate.

Human Services
6
Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment Action

The Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE) Action is a grassroots, member-led, statewide community organization working with more than 16,000 members in six counties across California, dedicated to raising the voices of…

Human Services
7
California Jewish Legislative Caucus Leadership Foundation

To promote social welfare by providing a forum to discuss, educate the public, and advance programs that promote topical issues of interest to the jewish community in california. the foundation will promote an understanding of cultural,…

Civil Rights
8
Million Voters Project Action Fund for Schools and Communities First

Support issues that reduce and eliminate structural barriers to social and economic opportunities for poor and economically disadvantaged communities and communities of color in california.

Civil Rights
9
Black American Political Association of California

Educate and advocacy

Civil Rights
10
Latino Business Chamber of Greater Los Angeles Inc

Economic development of the latino community

Community Improvement
11
California Black Power Network Action Fund

Promote social welfare thru political policy

Civil Rights
12
Californians for Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability

To support policies and ballot measures to curb increases in taxes throughout the state of California, including the qualification and passage of a proposed statewide initiative relating to the imposition of taxes and fees (California…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Gods Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
8/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS POLICY INSTITUTE: $210,000 · Civil RightsTHE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS POLIC…FOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA'S TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION ECONOMY: $75,000 · Science & TechFOUNDATION FOR C…LATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Arts & CultureLATINO LEG…ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Arts & CultureASIAN PACI…CALIFORNIA HAWAII NAACP STATE CONFERENCE: $15,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA HAWAII NAACP …Breakfast Media LLC: $15,000 · OtherBreakfast Media LLCCALIFORNIA HAWAII STATE CONFERENCE: $10,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA HAWAII STATE …BLACK INDIGENOUS WOMEN OF COLOR: $5,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD AFFILIATES OF CALIFORNIA INC: $5,000 · OtherANAHUAK YOUTH SPORTS ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · OtherANAHUAK YOUTH SPORTS ASS…FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE: $10,000 · OtherFUNDAMENTAL CHANGEGODS PANTRY: $8,000 · OtherGODS PANTRYFILIPINO YOUTH LEADERSHIP PROGRAM ORGANIZATION: $7,900 · OtherFILIPINO YOUTH LEADERSHI…THE CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR CIVIC PARTICIPATION: $7,500 · OtherTHE CALIFORNIA CENTER FO…CENTER FOR FINANCIAL EMPOWERMENT: $5,000 · OtherSEVENTH GENERATION ADVISORS: $5,000 · OtherLTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5,000 · OtherCHARITABLE FUND BENEFITTING GARDENA: $25,000 · PhilanthropyRIVER CATS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyCalifornia Border Issues Project: $25,000 · InternationalWomen in California Leadership Inc: $20,000 · Education
Civil Rights$210,000Science & Tech$75,000Arts & Culture$50,000Other$113,400Philanthropy$30,000International$25,000Education$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS POLICY INSTITUTE: $210,000 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA'S TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION ECONOMY: $75,000 over 4y, 40% of budgetLATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetCHARITABLE FUND BENEFITTING GARDENA: $25,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetCalifornia Border Issues Project: $25,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetWomen in California Leadership Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetANAHUAK YOUTH SPORTS ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetFUNDAMENTAL CHANGE: $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetGODS PANTRY: $8,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFILIPINO YOUTH LEADERSHIP PROGRAM ORGANIZATION: $7,900 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetTHE CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR CIVIC PARTICIPATION: $7,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetRIVER CATS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD AFFILIATES OF CALIFORNIA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR FINANCIAL EMPOWERMENT: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSEVENTH GENERATION ADVISORS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pharmaceutical Resear…Kaiser Foundation Hea…California Chamber of…California Charter Sc…California Fire Found…California Associatio…United Domestic Worke…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of AmericaDC21.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc · California Chamber of Commerce · California Charter Schools Association · California Fire Foundation · California Association of Hospitals and Health Systems · United Domestic Workers of America · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ca Broadband & Video Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ca Broadband & Video Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ca Broadband & Video Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home