Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Butler Parklands Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Philanthropy$16MRecreation & Sports$15MEnvironment$9.4MAnimals$1.3MArts & Culture$525kFood & Nutrition$51kPublic Benefit$50kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $170k
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.5M
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$112M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COBSCOOK SHORES INC$1,673,941
PENOBSCOT RIVER TRAILS INC$777,602
Individual grant recipient$170,000
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$25,000
CONNECTICUT RIVER CONSERVANCY$20,000
MID-COAST CONSERVANCY$15,000
OPEN SPACE INSTITUTE LAND TRUST INC$10,000
MAINE COAST HERITAGE TRUST$10,000
GREENUTICA$6,000
GALVESTON BAY FOUNDATION$5,000
FRIENDS OF ACADIA$5,000
PEE DEE LAND TRUST$5,000
TUG HILL TOMORROW LAND TRUST$5,000
WORLD MONUMENTS FUND$4,680
NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL OF MAINE$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 16% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TOMPKINS CONVERSATION: $227k → 9%BUTLER OUTDOOR EDUCATION FUND: $4.9M → 6%WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE: $62k → 9%OPEN SPACE INSTITUTE LAND TRUST INC: $283k → 17%ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND: $68k → 10%TOWN OF KINGSTREE: $50k → 26%AMERICAN RIVERS: $130k → 14%100 MILES: $25k → 14%THE CONSERVATION FUND: $251k → 7%MID-COAST CONSERVANCY: $25k → 9%MAINE COAST HERITAGE TRUST: $35k → 9%MAINE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $200k → 8%COBSCOOK SHORES INC: $3.3M → 6%WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE: $60k → 9%ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND: $45k → 10%AMERICAN RIVERS: $128k → 14%MARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $74k → 8%COBSCOOK SHORES INC: $3.2M → 6%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $337k → 28%ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND: $45k → 10%AMERICAN RIVERS: $127k → 14%PENOBSCOT RIVER TRAILS INC: $3.0M → 6%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $329k → 28%AMERICAN RIVERS: $127k → 14%COBSCOOK SHORES INC: $2.8M → 6%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $327k → 28%PENOBSCOT RIVER TRAILS INC: $2.2M → 6%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $326k → 28%COBSCOOK SHORES INC: $2.1M → 6%LAND TRUST ALLIANCE: $64k → 14%COBSCOOK SHORES INC: $2.0M → 6%BLACK RIVER CYPRESS PRESERVE LLC: $2.4M → 17%LAND TRUST ALLIANCE: $62k → 14%COBSCOOK SHORES INC: $1.7M → 6%BLACK RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $42k → 17%COBSCOOK SHORES INC: $927k → 6%PENOBSCOT RIVER TRAILS INC: $887k → 6%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $557k → 17%BUTLER OUTDOOR EDUCATION FUND: $870k → 6%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $362k → 17%PENOBSCOT RIVER TRAILS INC: $778k → 6%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $75k → 17%BUTLER OUTDOOR EDUCATION FUND: $759k → 6%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $75k → 17%PENOBSCOT RIVER TRAILS INC: $698k → 6%PENOBSCOT RIVER TRAILS INC: $662k → 6%PENOBSCOT RIVER TRAILS INC: $478k → 6%BUTLER OUTDOOR EDUCATION FUND: $110k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
ID
MT
NY
MA
CA
UT
CO
VA
NM
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$39M · 38 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

38 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
28

Total granted

$39M
$2.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+97%

Still filing today

74%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentAnimalsPhilanthropyArts & CultureFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    COBSCOOK SHORES INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $16M · revenue +96% · 100% of their budget
  • WC
    Wildlife Conservation Society
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1.3M · revenue +59%
  • WM
    WORLD MONUMENTS FUND INC
    4× · 2018–2024 · $525k · revenue +135%

Funded once

  • BR
    BLACK RIVER CYPRESS PRESERVE LLC
    one grant, 2021 · $2.4M
  • THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $251k · revenue +59%
  • TO
    TOWN OF KINGSTREE
    one grant, 2019 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Forest Law Center

Dedicated to protecting the world's natural environment on behalf of the public by serving as a public interest law firm. refer to schedule o, part iii, line 4a, for list of litigated cases or advocacy work.

—
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
Wetlands Foundation
Environment
4
New Jersey Conservation Foundation

Recognizing that a healthy environment is critical to the well-being and survival of all living things, new jersey conservation foundation is devoted to preserving land and protecting natural resources throughout new jersey's (continued on…

Environment
5
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
6
Climate Conservation Dba Center for Large Landscape Conservation

We bring science, policy, and proven solutions directly to communities working to restore the integrity and natural connectivity of the landscapes in which they live. (see schedule o)

Environment
7
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
8
The Quebec-Labrador Foundation Inc

The program mission of the quebec-labrador foundation u.s. is defined by a regional component (new england and eastern canada), and an international component, which ties our regional model to a global conservation network. qlf's program…

Philanthropy
9
West Creek Conservancy

Our mission is to enrich the lives of all people in northeast ohio by conserving natural habitats, restoring the ecological value of our region's lands and waters, and expanding opportunities to connect people from all cultures to…

Environment
10
Nature Collective

Nature collective's mission is to drive a passion for nature for all. we think inclusively and diversely when serving those devoid of nature those who remember nature and want to connect back to it and those who have an affinity with…

Environment
11
Maine Audubon Society

Maine Audubon works to conserve Maine's wildlife and habitat by engaging people of all ages in education, conservation, and action. We are helping the people of Maine become the nation's most informed and effective stewards of wildlife and…

Environment
12
Cascadia Wildlands

Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. we envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lowcountry Land Trust Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cobscook Shores Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyWildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Environmental Advocacy Orga…Urban Agriculture & Food Ac…Community FoundationsLand Conservation Organizat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr19%16%20–35yr13%53%35–55yr16%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%81%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr19%1%20–35yr13%7%35–55yr16%12%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/55
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,705

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/54
Grantees still filing
46/54
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COBSCOOK SHORES INC — $16,003,809 · PhilanthropyCOBSCOOK SHORES INC+2 more — $325,464 · PhilanthropyBUTLER OUTDOOR EDUCATION FUND — $6,630,325 · OtherBUTLER OUTDOOR EDUCATION FUNDIndividual grant recipient — $2,902,225 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBLACK RIVER CYPRESS PRESERVE LLC — $2,422,500 · OtherBLACK RIVER CYPRESS PRESERVE LLCTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $1,069,025 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY+25 more — $619,324 · OtherPENOBSCOT RIVER TRAILS INC — $8,697,392 · EnvironmentPENOBSCOT RIVER TRAILS INCAMERICAN RIVERS INC — $511,660 · Environment+31 more — $1,890,455 · Environment+31 moreWildlife Conservation Society — $1,318,435 · Animals+2 more — $4,500 · AnimalsWORLD MONUMENTS FUND INC — $525,251 · Arts & CultureMAINE ORGANIC FARMERS AND GARDENERS ASSOCIATION — $50,000 · Food & NutritionCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $18,500 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$16,329,273Other$13,643,399Environment$11,099,507Animals$1,322,935Arts & Culture$525,251Food & Nutrition$50,000Recreation & Sports$18,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOBSCOOK SHORES INC — $16,003,809 over 7y, 100% of budgetPENOBSCOT RIVER TRAILS INC — $8,697,392 over 7y, 100% of budgetBUTLER OUTDOOR EDUCATION FUND — $6,630,325 over 4y, 71% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society — $1,318,435 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $1,069,025 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD MONUMENTS FUND INC — $525,251 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN RIVERS INC — $511,660 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $354,119 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSouth Carolina Coastal Conservation League Inc — $304,036 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetOPEN SPACE INSTITUTE LAND TRUST INC — $293,580 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetMARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $275,211 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $251,114 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC — $125,856 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC — $122,450 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMaine Coast Heritage Trust — $120,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMidcoast Conservancy — $65,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetBLACK RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION INC — $50,253 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetMAINE ORGANIC FARMERS AND GARDENERS ASSOCIATION — $50,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNatural Resources Council of Maine Inc — $45,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTUG HILL TOMORROW LAND TRUST — $45,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetFriends of Acadia — $41,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetIDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTrees For Houston — $24,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetGalveston Bay Foundation Inc — $23,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTICUT RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY LAND TRUST INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $18,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPEE DEE LAND TRUST — $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL LAW PROJECT INC — $12,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF CEDAR MESA — $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ADIRONDACK COUNCIL INC — $6,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetINDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLewa Wildlife Conservancy USA — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDOWNEAST COASTAL CONSERVANCY — $2,120 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBUFFALO FIELD CAMPAIGN INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENPEACE FUND INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe 5 Gyres Institute — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSylvia Earle AllianceMission Blue — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARNSTABLE LAND TRUST INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSouthern Utah Wilderness Alliance — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCobscook Community Learning Center — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWoodstock Land Conservancy Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COBSCOOK SHORES INC ↗
  • Who funds PENOBSCOT RIVER TRAILS INC ↗
  • Who funds BUTLER OUTDOOR EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds WORLD MONUMENTS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN RIVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds South Carolina Coastal Conservation League Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPEN SPACE INSTITUTE LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds MARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds LAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Maine Coast Heritage Trust ↗
  • Who funds Midcoast Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds BLACK RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MAINE ORGANIC FARMERS AND GARDENERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Natural Resources Council of Maine Inc ↗
  • Who funds TUG HILL TOMORROW LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Acadia ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Trees For Houston ↗
  • Who funds Galveston Bay Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds LOWCOUNTRY LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds PEE DEE LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL LAW PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CEDAR MESA ↗
  • Who funds COMMONWEAL CONSERVANCY INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Nature ConservancyPatagoniaorgNational Fish and Wil…Gaylord and Dorothy D…Frances P Bunnelle Fo…Open Space Institute …Davis Conservation Fo…Boston Foundation IncCoastal Community Fou…The Cleveland Foundat…Maine Community Found…Marin Community Found…
The Nature ConservancyVA24.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Nature Conservancy · Patagoniaorg · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley Foundation · Frances P Bunnelle Foundation Coastal Community Foundation of Sc · Open Space Institute Land Trust Inc · Davis Conservation Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · The Cleveland Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Marin Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Butler Parklands Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Connecticut River Watershed Council Inc — 40% of income from government
  • Barnstable Land Trust Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club — 1% of income from government
  • Indian River Land Trust Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Butler Parklands Inc?

Find your warmest path to Butler Parklands Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines