Skip to content

· Private foundation

Burgdorf Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$142k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$206kFood & Nutrition$193kPublic Benefit$111kCrime & Legal$101kHuman Services$79kHealth$62kEducation$39kAnimals$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $110k
$5,400
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL$30,000
ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROJECT$15,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$15,000
FISHER HOUSE$10,000
MELANOMA RESEARCH ALLIANCE$10,000
SMILING GOAT RANCH$10,000
PORTOLA VALLEY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$10,000
PITT HOPKINS RESEARCH FOUNDATION$10,000
JUDICIAL WATCH$7,000
PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION$5,400
COAST GUARD MUTUAL ASSISTANCE$5,000
NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE FOUNDATION$3,750
NATIONAL LEGAL & POLICY CENTER$3,750
THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION$3,600
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 49% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $30k → 17%JUDICIAL WATCH: $7k → 14%PITT HOPKINS RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%SMILING GOAT RANCH: $10k → 6%COAST GUARD MUTUAL ASSISTANCE: $8k → 7%FISHER HOUSE: $15k → 8%PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $30k → 17%JUDICIAL WATCH: $7k → 14%FISHER HOUSE: $10k → 8%HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 17%JUDICIAL WATCH: $5k → 14%FISHER HOUSE: $10k → 8%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $15k → 7%HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $23k → 17%FISHER HOUSE: $10k → 8%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $15k → 7%HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $22k → 17%FISHER HOUSE: $8k → 8%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $13k → 7%HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $21k → 17%FISHER HOUSE: $8k → 8%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $11k → 7%HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 17%FISHER HOUSE: $8k → 8%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $11k → 7%HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $16k → 17%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $10k → 7%ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROJECT: $15k → 8%HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $16k → 17%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $9k → 7%ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROJECT: $15k → 8%MELANOMA RESEARCH ALLIANCE: $10k → 14%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $8k → 7%ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROJECT: $13k → 8%MELANOMA RESEARCH ALLIANCE: $10k → 14%ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROJECT: $11k → 8%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $7k → 7%ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROJECT: $11k → 8%ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROJECT: $10k → 8%ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROJECT: $8k → 8%PORTOLA VALLEY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROJECT: $8k → 8%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%PORTOLA VALLEY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $6k → 7%ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROJECT: $6k → 8%PORTOLA VALLEY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $6k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
CA
CO
VA
MD
AR
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$791k · 28 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
3

Total granted

$791k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+111%

Still filing today

54%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPublic BenefitCrime & LegalInternationalAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $202k · revenue +37%
  • FH
    FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $79k · revenue +32%
  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +141%

Funded once

  • PI
    Pets In Needgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +111%
  • GS
    Giant Steps Therapeutic Equestrian Center Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +30%
  • CH
    Children's hunger project
    one grant, 2017 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
2
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
5
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
6
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
7
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
8
Foundation for Financial Planning Inc

Our mission is to help people in need improve their financial lives by expanding access to pro bono financial planning.

Human Services
9
Naval Postgraduate School Foundation Inc

Our mission is to support the naval postgraduate school by providing funding and programmatic support for education, research, technology development, institutional initiatives, and community programs that advance national security and…

Education
10
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
11
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
12
San Francisco Friends School

At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is United Pegasus Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $97,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKECUMENICAL HUNGER PROJECT: $95,000 · OtherECUMENICAL HUNGER PROJECTFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $78,500 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INCMELANOMA RESEARCH ALLIANCE: $23,000 · OtherMELANOMA RESEARCH ALLIANCEIndividual grant recipient: $14,000 · Other+11 more: $19,325 · Other+11 moreHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $201,500 · InternationalHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL+1 more: $4,000 · InternationalJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $45,300 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH…COAST GUARD MUTUAL ASSISTANCE: $38,300 · Public BenefitCOAST GUARD MU…THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $23,800 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE F…Pacific Legal Foundation: $41,900 · Crime & LegalPacific Legal…NATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER: $30,050 · Crime & LegalNATIONAL LEGA…NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $29,000 · Crime & LegalNATIONAL RIGH…The Fistula Foundation: $16,500 · HealthSMILING GOAT RANCH INC: $10,000 · HealthPITT HOPKINS RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthPORTOLA VALLEY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $27,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $7,200 · Education+1 more: $600 · EducationUNITED PEGASUS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · AnimalsPets In Need: $1,400 · AnimalsKQED INC: $1,750 · Arts & Culture
Other$326,825International$205,500Public Benefit$107,400Crime & Legal$100,950Health$37,500Education$34,800Animals$6,400Arts & Culture$1,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $201,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $78,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $45,300 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation: $41,900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCOAST GUARD MUTUAL ASSISTANCE: $38,300 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER: $30,050 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $29,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPORTOLA VALLEY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $27,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $23,800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Fistula Foundation: $16,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPITT HOPKINS RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $7,200 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED PEGASUS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFREEDOM ALLIANCE: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $1,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPets In Need: $1,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOK RANCH INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE HALF MOON BAY LIBRARY: $600 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation ↗
  • Who funds COAST GUARD MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PORTOLA VALLEY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Fistula Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SMILING GOAT RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds PITT HOPKINS RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED PEGASUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds Pets In Need ↗
  • Who funds BOK RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Giant Steps Therapeutic Equestrian Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE HALF MOON BAY LIBRARY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Burgdorf Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Burgdorf Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Burgdorf Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph