Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Burgdorf Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$142k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

International$206kFood & Nutrition$193kPublic Benefit$111kCrime & Legal$101kHuman Services$79kHealth$62kEducation$39kAnimals$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $110k
$5,400
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL$30,000
ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROJECT$15,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$15,000
FISHER HOUSE$10,000
PITT HOPKINS RESEARCH FOUNDATION$10,000
MELANOMA RESEARCH ALLIANCE$10,000
SMILING GOAT RANCH$10,000
PORTOLA VALLEY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$10,000
JUDICIAL WATCH$7,000
PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION$5,400
COAST GUARD MUTUAL ASSISTANCE$5,000
NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE FOUNDATION$3,750
NATIONAL LEGAL & POLICY CENTER$3,750
THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION$3,600
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 49% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $30k → 17%JUDICIAL WATCH: $7k → 14%PITT HOPKINS RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%SMILING GOAT RANCH: $10k → 6%COAST GUARD MUTUAL ASSISTANCE: $8k → 7%FISHER HOUSE: $15k → 8%PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $30k → 17%JUDICIAL WATCH: $7k → 14%FISHER HOUSE: $10k → 8%HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 17%JUDICIAL WATCH: $5k → 14%FISHER HOUSE: $10k → 8%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $15k → 7%HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $23k → 17%FISHER HOUSE: $10k → 8%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $15k → 7%HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $22k → 17%FISHER HOUSE: $8k → 8%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $13k → 7%HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $21k → 17%FISHER HOUSE: $8k → 8%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $11k → 7%HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 17%FISHER HOUSE: $8k → 8%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $11k → 7%HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $16k → 17%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $10k → 7%ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROJECT: $15k → 8%HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $16k → 17%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $9k → 7%ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROJECT: $15k → 8%MELANOMA RESEARCH ALLIANCE: $10k → 14%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $8k → 7%ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROJECT: $13k → 8%MELANOMA RESEARCH ALLIANCE: $10k → 14%ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROJECT: $11k → 8%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $7k → 7%ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROJECT: $11k → 8%ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROJECT: $10k → 8%ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROJECT: $8k → 8%PORTOLA VALLEY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROJECT: $8k → 8%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%PORTOLA VALLEY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $6k → 7%ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROJECT: $6k → 8%PORTOLA VALLEY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $6k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
CA
CO
VA
MD
AR
NC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$791k · 28 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
3

Total granted

$791k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+111%

Still filing today

54%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPublic BenefitCrime & LegalInternationalAnimalsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $202k · revenue +37%
  • FH
    FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $79k · revenue +32%
  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +141%

Funded once

  • PI
    Pets In Needgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +111%
  • GS
    Giant Steps Therapeutic Equestrian Center Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +30%
  • CH
    Children's hunger project
    one grant, 2017 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

2
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

4
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
5
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
6
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
7
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
8
Foundation for Financial Planning Inc

Our mission is to help people in need improve their financial lives by expanding access to pro bono financial planning.

Human Services
9
Naval Postgraduate School Foundation Inc

Our mission is to support the naval postgraduate school by providing funding and programmatic support for education, research, technology development, institutional initiatives, and community programs that advance national security and…

Education
10
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
11
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
12
San Francisco Friends School

At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is United Pegasus Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%48%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr16%73%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%2%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/21
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,544

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK — $97,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKECUMENICAL HUNGER PROJECT — $95,000 · OtherECUMENICAL HUNGER PROJECTFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $78,500 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INCMELANOMA RESEARCH ALLIANCE — $23,000 · OtherMELANOMA RESEARCH ALLIANCEIndividual grant recipient — $14,000 · Other+11 more — $19,325 · Other+11 moreHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL — $201,500 · InternationalHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL+1 more — $4,000 · InternationalJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $45,300 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH…COAST GUARD MUTUAL ASSISTANCE — $38,300 · Public BenefitCOAST GUARD MU…THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $23,800 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE F…Pacific Legal Foundation — $41,900 · Crime & LegalPacific Legal…NATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER — $30,050 · Crime & LegalNATIONAL LEGA…NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $29,000 · Crime & LegalNATIONAL RIGH…The Fistula Foundation — $16,500 · HealthSMILING GOAT RANCH INC — $10,000 · HealthPITT HOPKINS RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Health+1 more — $1,000 · HealthPORTOLA VALLEY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $27,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $7,200 · Education+1 more — $600 · EducationUNITED PEGASUS FOUNDATION — $5,000 · AnimalsPets In Need — $1,400 · AnimalsKQED INC — $1,750 · Arts & Culture
Other$326,825International$205,500Public Benefit$107,400Crime & Legal$100,950Health$37,500Education$34,800Animals$6,400Arts & Culture$1,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL — $201,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $78,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $45,300 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation — $41,900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCOAST GUARD MUTUAL ASSISTANCE — $38,300 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER — $30,050 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $29,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPORTOLA VALLEY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $27,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $23,800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Fistula Foundation — $16,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPITT HOPKINS RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $7,200 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED PEGASUS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFREEDOM ALLIANCE — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC — $1,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPets In Need — $1,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOK RANCH INC — $1,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE HALF MOON BAY LIBRARY — $600 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC
  • Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation
  • Who funds COAST GUARD MUTUAL ASSISTANCE
  • Who funds NATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER
  • Who funds NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PORTOLA VALLEY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds The Fistula Foundation
  • Who funds SMILING GOAT RANCH INC
  • Who funds PITT HOPKINS RESEARCH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE
  • Who funds UNITED PEGASUS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FREEDOM ALLIANCE
  • Who funds KQED INC
  • Who funds Pets In Need
  • Who funds BOK RANCH INC
  • Who funds Giant Steps Therapeutic Equestrian Center Inc
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE HALF MOON BAY LIBRARY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Burgdorf Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph