Skip to content

· Private foundation

Building Dreams Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$204k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$207kEducation$171kYouth Development$159kFood & Nutrition$156kHuman Services$73kArts & Culture$39kCrime & Legal$30kRecreation & Sports$28kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $163k
$8,800
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MANTECALATHROP$22,500
INNER CITY ACTION$20,795
CALVARY COMMUNITY CHURCH$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC$20,000
HOPE MINISTRIES$20,000
FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN$15,000
WITHOUT PERMISSION$14,500
JACKSON 3 FOUNDATION$10,000
WIDE HORIZONS$10,000
CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL$10,000
HAVEN OF PEACE$8,800
YOUNG LIFE$8,000
SIERRA HIGH SCHOOL$7,000
GREAT VALLEY BOOKFEST$5,000
CANINE COMPANIONS$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $122k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $3k → 9%SOCIETY FOR DISABILITIES: $5k → 15%SOCIETY FOR DISABILITIES: $5k → 15%SOCIETY FOR DISABILITIES: $5k → 15%GIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE: $11k → 12%WIDE HORIZONS: $10k → 12%GIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE: $10k → 12%GIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE: $10k → 12%WIDE HORIZONS: $10k → 12%GIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE: $6k → 12%GIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE: $3k → 12%GIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE: $1k → 12%GIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE: $1k → 12%NOT FORGOTTEN: $1k → 12%THOMAS TOY COMMUNITY CENTER: $20k → 12%THOMAS TOY COMMUNITY CENTER: $16k → 12%AGAPE VILLAGES: $1k → 12%AGAPE VILLAGES: $1k → 12%AGAPE VILLAGES: $1k → 12%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $1k → 12%AGAPE VILLAGES: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$918k · 31 repeat orgs$74k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
18

Total granted

$918k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+11%

Still filing today

48%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterAnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HM
    HOPE MINISTRIES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $98k · revenue +73% · 93% of their budget
  • HO
    HAVEN OF PEACE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $71k · revenue +79%
  • UO
    University of the Pacific
    4× · 2021–2024 · $61k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • WR
    WESTON RANCH HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • MF
    MUSD FUTURE TEACHERS PATHWAY
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF EAST UNION MEMEORIAL CEMETARY
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Peoples Properties Inc

Homeless

—
2
Love Inc of Manteca

To mobilize christians to transform living and the community in the name of christ.

Food & Nutrition
3
Victory Mission

To operate and maintain a rescue mission at Salinas, California provide Job training

Human Services
4
Inland Empire Rescue Mission Inc

Serve the least, the last and lost in the Inland Empire

—
5
Desert Manna Inc

to provide services to homeless and low income men and women and children in Barstow, California area. Servicies include emergency housing, food, clothing and utilities assistance, Also assist in job training.

—
6
Mission Solano Rescue Mission

Providing an economic and spiritual bridge for homeless/disadvantaged people striving to regain the basics of life and restoring hope in themselves and their future by achieving economic stability so that they are able to rejoin the…

—
7
Manna House of Mariposa County

To provide assistance in emergency situations.

—
8
Jovenes Inc

To facilitate the transition of homeless, at risk youth and the poor to establish stable grounds and become independent.

Human Services
9
My Fathers House Visalia Inc

My Father's House is a transitional living home that men live in community with others striving for success. These men move to better places in our dorm area to individual rooms as they accomplish their goals. Although we do not have a…

Religion
10
Northern Valley Catholic Social Service Inc

Inspiring hope and transforming lives since 1986, nvcss has provided essential services and support to individuals and families throughout northern california. annually, the organization serves more than 84,500 people across six counties…

—
11
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Santa Rosa

Catholic charities creates access to opportunities for self-sufficiency by providing innovative and compassionate services to people of all backgrounds, beliefs, and cultures.

Human Services
12
Hands of Hope Resources for Homeless Families

Hands of Hope works to enhance the quality of life in the Yuba-Sutter area by: Providing core support services to the homeless; Reintegrating the homeless within our community; Engaging the community to respond to the challenge of…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gospel Center Rescue Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hope Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SJ COUNTY: $78,450 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SJ COUNTYCALVARY COMMUNITY CHURCH: $75,500 · OtherCALVARY COMMUNITY CHURCHHAVEN OF PEACE: $70,704 · OtherHAVEN OF PEACESIERRA HIGH SCHOOL: $43,975 · OtherSIERRA HIGH SCHOOLFRIENDS OF EAST UNION MEMORIAL CEMETERY: $35,995 · OtherFRIENDS OF EAST UNION MEMORIAL CEMETERYGREAT VALLEY BOOKFEST INC: $35,000 · OtherGREAT VALLEY BOOKFEST INCCHILD ABUSE PREVENTION: $32,500 · OtherCHILD ABUSE PREVENTION+34 more: $177,729 · Other+34 moreGIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE: $41,924 · Human ServicesGIVE EVERY CHI…THOMAS TOY COMMUNITY CENTER: $36,460 · Human ServicesTHOMAS TOY COM…Wide Horizons Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesWide Horizons …SOCIETY FOR DISABILITIES: $15,000 · Human ServicesSOCIETY FOR DI…CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $5,500 · Human Services+3 more: $6,000 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MANTECA: $88,250 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRL…YOUNG LIFE: $16,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFEHOPE MINISTRIES: $97,663 · PhilanthropyHOPE MINIST…+1 more: $650 · PhilanthropyUniversity of the Pacific: $61,000 · EducationINNER CITY ACTION INC: $30,795 · ReligionGOSPEL CENTER RESCUE MISSION INC: $23,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$549,853Human Services$124,884Youth Development$104,250Philanthropy$98,313Education$61,000Religion$30,795Housing & Shelter$23,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOPE MINISTRIES: $97,663 over 8y, 93% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MANTECA: $88,250 over 8y, 6.9% of budgetHAVEN OF PEACE: $70,704 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetUniversity of the Pacific: $61,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE: $41,924 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTHOMAS TOY COMMUNITY CENTER: $36,460 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetINNER CITY ACTION INC: $30,795 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGOSPEL CENTER RESCUE MISSION INC: $23,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWide Horizons Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetMANTECA RIGHT TO LIFE: $17,206 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY FOR DISABILITIES: $15,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetLIONS PROJECT FOR CANINE COMPANIONS: $14,500 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetWITHOUT PERMISSION INC: $14,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMANTECA LITTLE LEAGUE: $6,500 over 4y, 6.3% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAgape Villages Inc: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCLOSE UP FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIS WAY RECOVERY HOUSE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST: $1,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetNot Forgotten Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetINLAND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA UNITED WAY: $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOPE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MANTECA ↗
  • Who funds HAVEN OF PEACE ↗
  • Who funds University of the Pacific ↗
  • Who funds GIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS TOY COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds INNER CITY ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds GOSPEL CENTER RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds Wide Horizons Inc ↗
  • Who funds MANTECA RIGHT TO LIFE ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR DISABILITIES ↗
  • Who funds LIONS PROJECT FOR CANINE COMPANIONS ↗
  • Who funds WITHOUT PERMISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds MANTECA LITTLE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Agape Villages Inc ↗
  • Who funds CLOSE UP FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Antone and Marie Raymus FoundationCA30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Antone and Marie Raymus Foundation · Albert & Rina Brocchini Family Foundation · The Cortopassi Family Foundation · Rosi Cerri Foundation Inc · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Network for Good · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Building Dreams Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Building Dreams Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Building Dreams Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Building Dreams Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Building Dreams’ filings →

    More from the funding graph