Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bryant Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2024still arriving
30
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$112kHuman Services$37kEducation$12kYouth Development$11kPhilanthropy$9kArts & Culture$8kHousing & Shelter$4kHealth$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k29 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$1,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$614k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HILLYER$12,364
LACY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$5,500
METHODIST HOME FOR CHILDREN$4,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
BROOKGREEN GARDENS$2,500
WHIRLIGIG$2,500
KK FUND$2,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT$1,300
Individual grant recipient$1,100
OWENSBORO COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,000
GLOBAL MINISTRIES$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
BOULWARE MISSION$1,000
PITINO SHELTER$1,000
CAROLINA BALLET$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 32% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%METHODIST HOME FOR CHILDREN: $4k → 8%THE BLUEGRASS CARE NAVIGATORS: $50 → 15%CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES: $50 → 15%CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES: $50 → 15%CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES: $50 → 15%CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES: $50 → 15%CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES: $50 → 15%BOULWARE MISSION: $1k → 13%BOULWARE MISSION: $500 → 13%AID THE HOMELESS: $100 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
IN
OH
RI
KY
AZ
NM
TN
NC
SC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$166k · 22 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
37

Total granted

$166k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+15%

Still filing today

41%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BROOKGREEN GARDENS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $5k · revenue +16%
  • TR
    THE ROBERT AUSTIN MEYTHALER FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +110%
  • IS
    ISSAC STERETT ADVENTURE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • MA
    MARYLIN AND WILLIAM YOUNG FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • LF
    LACY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Brevard College Corporation

Brevard college is committed to an experiential liberal arts education that encourages personal growth and inspires artistic, intellectual, and social action.

Education
2
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
3
Barton College

Founded in 1902, barton college is a four-year, private, liberal arts college located in wilson, n.c. the barton experience focuses on academic excellence within a wide range of professional and liberal arts programs leading to…

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
Ballet Theatre Foundation Inc

To create, to present, to preserve, and to extend the great repertoire of classical dancing through exciting performances and educational programming of the highest quality, presented to the widest possible audience. american ballet…

Arts & Culture
6
Greensboro College

Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.

Education
7
Carolina Art Association Dba Gibbes Museum of Art

The mission of the gibbes museum of art is to enhance lives through art by engaging people of every background and experience with art and artists of enduring quality; collect and preserve the art that touches charleston; and provide…

Arts & Culture
8
Boys and Girls Clubs of Middle Tennessee

Boys & girls clubs of middle tennessee's ("bgcmt") mission is to enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens. in essence, we seek to save and…

Youth Development
9
Charlotte Mecklenburg Afro-American Cultural and Service Center Inc

The harvey b. gantt center for african-american arts and culture (formerly the charlotte-mecklenburg afro-american cultural and service center) exists to present, preserve and promote african american art, culture and history for the…

Arts & Culture
10
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
11
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
12
Wellesley College

To provide an excellent liberal arts education for women who will make a difference in the world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of the Bluegrass Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hackett Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
14/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $107,945 · OtherFIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCHHILLYER: $12,364 · OtherHILLYERFAMILY Y: $10,700 · OtherFAMILY YIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherLACY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $6,750 · Other+49 more: $39,837 · Other+49 moreThe Methodist Home for Children Inc: $4,000 · Human ServicesBOULWARE MISSION INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesISSAC STERETT ADVENTURE FOUNDATION: $1,350 · Human ServicesIMAGINATION LIBRARY OF DAVIESS COUNTY INC: $1,000 · Human Services+3 more: $400 · Human ServicesBROOKGREEN GARDENS: $4,500 · EnvironmentIMPACT 100 - OWENSBORO INC: $2,500 · PhilanthropyHACKETT FAMILY FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $500 · PhilanthropyCAROLINA BALLET INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureART CENTER OF THE BLUEGRASS INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION: $550 · Arts & CultureRIVERPARK CENTER INC: $500 · Arts & CultureBINGHAMTON DOWNTOWN SINGERS INC: $250 · Arts & CultureTHE ROBERT AUSTIN MEYTHALER FOUNDATION INC: $2,400 · EducationGIRLS INCORPORATED OF OWENSBORO-DAV COUNTY: $550 · Education+1 more: $50 · EducationBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 · HealthPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $100 · Health
Other$185,096Human Services$8,250Environment$4,500Philanthropy$4,000Arts & Culture$3,300Education$3,000Health$1,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBROOKGREEN GARDENS: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Methodist Home for Children Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT 100 - OWENSBORO INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ROBERT AUSTIN MEYTHALER FOUNDATION INC: $2,400 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetBOULWARE MISSION INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetISSAC STERETT ADVENTURE FOUNDATION: $1,350 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCAROLINA BALLET INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetART CENTER OF THE BLUEGRASS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN HERITAGE COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHACKETT FAMILY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOWENSBORO ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $650 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF OWENSBORO-DAV COUNTY: $550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERPARK CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLIFF HAGAN BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC: $250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBINGHAMTON DOWNTOWN SINGERS INC: $250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAID THE HOMELESS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEXINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of the Bluegrass Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN COLLEGE: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BROOKGREEN GARDENS ↗
  • Who funds The Methodist Home for Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT 100 - OWENSBORO INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ROBERT AUSTIN MEYTHALER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOULWARE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds ISSAC STERETT ADVENTURE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAROLINA BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds ART CENTER OF THE BLUEGRASS INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds IMAGINATION LIBRARY OF DAVIESS COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN HERITAGE COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds HACKETT FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OWENSBORO ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF OWENSBORO-DAV COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Louisville IncKY26.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Lester E Yeager Charitable Trust B · Marilyn & William Young Charitable Foundation Inc C/O Sara Hemingway Ex Di · The Whas Crusade for Children Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · B J Killian Foundation · United Way of the Ohio Valley Inc · Lawrence & Augusta Hager Educational Foundation Inc · Public Life Foundation of Owensboro · Owensboro Health Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bryant Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bryant Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bryant Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Bryant Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bryant’s filings →

    More from the funding graph