Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

B J Killian Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$510k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$1.0MHuman Services$495kArts & Culture$355kYouth Development$260kHousing & Shelter$190kHealth$140kFood & Nutrition$115kCrime & Legal$110kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $433k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$7.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OWENSBORO COMMUNITY COLLEGE$55,000
APOLLO HIGH SCHOOL$35,000
SENIOR COMMUNITY CENTER$35,000
KENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE$30,000
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY (STLOUIS)$30,000
HELP OFFICE OF OWENSBORO INC$25,000
GOVERNOR'S SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS$25,000
WKU STUDENT LIFE FOUNDATION$22,500
KET$20,000
CLIFF HAGAN BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$20,000
Owensboro Family YMCA$20,000
CASA OF OHIO VALLEY INC$20,000
RIVERPARK CENTER$20,000
GIRLS INC$20,000
J H NEBLETT COMMUNITY CENTER INC$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $180k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BOULWARE MISSION INC: $15k → 13%BOULWARE MISSION INC: $15k → 13%BOULWARE MISSION INC: $15k → 13%BOULWARE MISSION INC: $15k → 13%BOULWARE MISSION INC: $15k → 13%BOULWARE MISSION INC: $15k → 13%Hospice of Western Kentucky: $8k → 13%Hospice of Western Kentucky: $8k → 13%GOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO: $8k → 13%Hospice of Western Kentucky: $8k → 13%GOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO: $8k → 13%GOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO: $8k → 13%Hospice of Western Kentucky: $8k → 13%Hospice of Western Kentucky: $8k → 13%GOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO: $8k → 13%Hospice of Western Kentucky: $8k → 13%GOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO: $8k → 13%GOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO: $8k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of B J Killian Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in KY; read by stated purpose it is 92% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

B J Killian Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.7% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.8M · 33 repeat orgs$205k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
5

Total granted

$2.8M
$95k

Still filing today

45%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $170k · revenue +33%
  • WS
    WKU Student Life Foundation Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $115k · revenue +16%
  • GI
    GIRLS INCORPORATED OF OWENSBORO-DAV COUNTY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $110k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • TK
    TEAM KENTUCKY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • OR
    OWENSBORO RIVERPARK CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • PS
    PITINO SHELTER SOUP KITCHEN
    one grant, 2020 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Owensboro Chamber of Commerce Inc

Providing leadership, advocacy and member services that foster growth and economic prosperity for our region.

2
Goodwill Industries of Kentucky Inc

Goodwill's mission is to help people with disabilities or other disadvantages achieve and maintain employment to gain a better quality of life.

Employment
3
Owensborodaviess County Regional Dental Clinic Inc

To provide basic dental services to low income individuals and families that either have no form of dental insurance or rely upon medicaid.

Health
4
Westcare Kentucky Inc

To provide substance abuse prevention & treatment.

Health
5
Oasis Womens Center

Assist victims of domestic violence & prevention

Human Services
6
Ohio Valley Goodwill Industries

The mission of ohio valley goodwill industries rehabilitation center, inc. is to provide vocational rehabilitation, training, and employment services to individuals with either disabilities or social and economic barriers to full employment

7
Oswego County Opportunities Inc

To inspire partnerships and provide services that empower people, support communities and change lives.

Human Services
8
Owensboro Health Inc

Owensboro health, inc. exists to heal the sick and improve the health of the communities we serve.

Health
9
Pregnancy Center of Owensboro Inc

Meeting the spiritual and physical needs of women facing crises concerning pregnancies.

Health
10
Owensboro Health Medical Group Inc

Owensboro health medical group, inc. exists to heal the sick and improve the health of the community.

Health
11
Hospice of Southern Kentucky Inc

The hospice mission is to honor life through exceptional service and compassionate care. the organization is primarily engaged in providing care and support that enables the terminally ill to spend their final days in a comfortable and…

12
Child Watch Counseling and Advocacy Center Inc

To provide families in western kentucky with education, advocacy and treatment that prevents child abuse, encourages family stability, promotes healthy relationships, enhances well-being and cultivates safe, nurturing families.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Owensboro Area Shelter Information and Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Independence Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OWENSBORO COMMUNTIY COLLEGE — $215,000 · OtherOWENSBORO COMMUNTIY COLLEGEWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY (STLOUIS) — $170,000 · OtherWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY (STLOUIS)DAVIESS COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION — $160,000 · OtherDAVIESS COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATIONGOVERNOR'S SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS — $120,000 · OtherGOVERNOR'S SCHOOL FOR THE ARTSFamily Y of Owensboro-Daviess Co — $110,000 · OtherFamily Y of Owensboro-Daviess CoSENIOR COMMUNITY CENTER — $100,000 · OtherKET — $95,000 · OtherOWENSBORO AREA SHELTER INFORMATION AND SERVICES INC — $90,000 · OtherOWENSBORO SCIENCE MUSEUM — $80,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS — $70,000 · OtherHL NEBLETT COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $65,000 · Other+19 more — $655,000 · Other+19 moreKENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE — $170,000 · EducationKENTUCKY WESLEYAN…WKU Student Life Foundation Inc — $115,000 · EducationWKU Student Life …GIRLS INCORPORATED OF OWENSBORO-DAV COUNTY — $110,000 · EducationGIRLS INCORPORATE…BRESCIA UNIVERSITY INC — $80,000 · EducationBRESCIA UNIVERSIT…BOULWARE MISSION INC — $90,000 · Human ServicesGOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO KENTUCKY INC — $45,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE OF THE OHIO VALLEY INC — $45,000 · Human ServicesCASA OF OHIO VALLEY INC — $110,000 · Civil RightsCLIFF HAGAN BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC — $110,000 · Youth DevelopmentRIVERPARK CENTER INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureDANIEL PITINO SHELTER INC — $60,000 · Housing & ShelterIndependence Foundation Inc — $30,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,930,000Education$475,000Human Services$180,000Civil Rights$110,000Youth Development$110,000Arts & Culture$100,000Housing & Shelter$60,000Philanthropy$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE — $170,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWKU Student Life Foundation Inc — $115,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCASA OF OHIO VALLEY INC — $110,000 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF OWENSBORO-DAV COUNTY — $110,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetFamily Y of Owensboro-Daviess Co — $110,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetCLIFF HAGAN BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC — $110,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetRIVERPARK CENTER INC — $100,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetBOULWARE MISSION INC — $90,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetOWENSBORO AREA SHELTER INFORMATION AND SERVICES INC — $90,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetBRESCIA UNIVERSITY INC — $80,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHL NEBLETT COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $65,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetDANIEL PITINO SHELTER INC — $60,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetGOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO KENTUCKY INC — $45,000 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetHOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE OF THE OHIO VALLEY INC — $45,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHEATRE WORKSHOP OF OWENSBORO INC — $45,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetIndependence Foundation Inc — $30,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE
  • Who funds WKU Student Life Foundation Inc
  • Who funds CASA OF OHIO VALLEY INC
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF OWENSBORO-DAV COUNTY
  • Who funds Family Y of Owensboro-Daviess Co
  • Who funds CLIFF HAGAN BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC
  • Who funds RIVERPARK CENTER INC
  • Who funds BOULWARE MISSION INC
  • Who funds OWENSBORO AREA SHELTER INFORMATION AND SERVICES INC
  • Who funds BRESCIA UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds HL NEBLETT COMMUNITY CENTER INC
  • Who funds DANIEL PITINO SHELTER INC
  • Who funds GOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO KENTUCKY INC
  • Who funds HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE OF THE OHIO VALLEY INC
  • Who funds THEATRE WORKSHOP OF OWENSBORO INC
  • Who funds Independence Foundation Inc
  • Who funds HELP OFFICE OF OWENSBORO INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Owensboro Health IncKY32.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Owensboro Health Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Marilyn & William Young Charitable Foundation Inc C/O Sara Hemingway Ex Di · Public Life Foundation of Owensboro · Lester E Yeager Charitable Trust B · United Way of the Ohio Valley Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation Inc · Impact 100 - Owensboro Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Michael E Horn Family Foundation Inc Ima · Fraternal Order of Eagles Aerie 4168

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization B J Killian Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph