Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Public Life Foundation of Owensboro

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$3.5M
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Philanthropy$3.5MHuman Services$1.0MCivil Rights$760kEducation$711kCommunity Improvement$151kPublic Benefit$107kArts & Culture$92kPublic Safety & Disaster$72kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $46k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $369k
  • $250k+2 grants · $4.0M
$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DAF GIVING 360 - THE JOHN AND MARJORIE HAGER FUND$3,518,819
GOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO$500,300
OWENSBORO FAMILY YMCA$149,194
PRICHARD COMMITTEE FOR ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE$100,000
THE CENTER OF OWENSBORO$70,000
GREATER OWENSBORO LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$50,000
DAVIESS COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY$6,650
DAVIESS COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$6,268
MIRACLE OF KY AND TN FBO H L NEBLETT CENTER$5,000
SCHOLASTIC INC FBO OWENSBORO HEALTH PEDIATRICS$4,649
UNITED WAY OF OHIO VALLEY$3,000
CATHEDRAL PRESCHOOL$3,000
H L NEBLETT COMMUNITY CENTER$3,000
IMAGINATION LIBRARY OF DAVIESS CO$3,000
GREEN RIVER DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $633k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AUDUBON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $6k → 13%GOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO: $1k → 13%PUZZLE PIECES: $1k → 13%BOULWARE MISSION: $1k → 13%GOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO: $500k → 13%GOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO: $40k → 13%GOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO: $40k → 13%GOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO: $40k → 13%GOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO: $1k → 13%SENIOR COMMUNITY CENTER OF ODC: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 30 repeat orgs$3.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.

30 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
33

Total granted

$2.9M
$123k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
-3%

Still filing today

43%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO KENTUCKY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $624k · revenue +520% · 44% of their budget
  • PC
    PRICHARD COMMITTEE FOR ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $520k · revenue +377%
  • FY
    Family Y of Owensboro-Daviess Co
    6× · 2020–2025 · $307k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • OD
    OWENSBORO DAV CO REGIONAL DENTAL CLINIC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • WC
    WYLDE CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +32%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Goodwill Industries of Kentucky Inc

Goodwill's mission is to help people with disabilities or other disadvantages achieve and maintain employment to gain a better quality of life.

Employment
2
Ky Access to Justice Commission Inc

To increase access to the courts and high-quality legal representation for people with low and moderate incomes living in kentucky through innovative partnerships with the judiciary, the civil legal aid programs, private bar, law schools,…

Crime & Legal
3
Kentucky Senior Citizens Apartments Inc

Provide staffing and services to operate apartment complexes for senior citizens in northern kentucky.

4
Commerce Lexington Inc

To represent our members, creating the environment and opportunity for economic prosperity and quality living in central kentucky.

5
Owensville Primary Care Inc

Our mission is to provide patient centered medical and behavioral health services to our community. As a nonprofit organization, we provide these services to all persons, including our communitys most vulnerable - regardless of financial…

Health
6
The Center for Rural Development Inc

To provide economic development to southeastern kentucky.

Community Improvement
7
Guthrie Opportunity Center Foundation Inc

The primary mission is to support intellectually disabled people in the community through vocational training and work opportunities. our goal is to develop and establish new vocational opportunities for existing clientele and to increase…

Human Services
8
Child Watch Counseling and Advocacy Center Inc

To provide families in western kentucky with education, advocacy and treatment that prevents child abuse, encourages family stability, promotes healthy relationships, enhances well-being and cultivates safe, nurturing families.

Crime & Legal
9
Owensboro Health Inc

Owensboro health, inc. exists to heal the sick and improve the health of the communities we serve.

Health
10
HealthFirst Bluegrass Inc

Healthfirst provides outpatient primary healthcare, behavioral health and dental services to the underserved and uninsured residents of fayette county and surrounding counties in kentucky.

Health
11
Kentucky Association for Economic Development Inc

Our purpose is to educate, advocate and connect with our members on issues that are important to the economic development in the commonwealth of kentucky.

Community Improvement
12
Northern Kentucky Education Council Inc

Strengthen, unite, and mobilize education, business and community partners in Northern Kentucky to advance student success and wellbeing from early childhood through post-secondary/career.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Incorporated of Owensboro-Dav County and the most unlike its peers is Marilyn & William Young Charitable Foundation Inc C/O Sara Hemingway Ex Di. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%5%<5yr18%5%5–10yr17%14%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr12%23%35–55yr19%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%6%<5yr18%1%5–10yr17%0%10–20yr16%2%20–35yr12%70%35–55yr19%20%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
12%
45/383

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
16/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DAF GIVING 360 - THE JOHN AND MARJORIE HAGER FUND — $3,518,819 · OtherDAF GIVING 360 - THE JOHN AND MARJORIE HAGER FUNDTHE CENTER — $846,395 · OtherTHE CENTERFamily Y of Owensboro-Daviess Co — $306,904 · OtherFamily Y of Owensboro-Daviess Co+48 more — $647,910 · Other+48 moreGOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO KENTUCKY INC — $623,700 · Human ServicesGOODFELLOW…+4 more — $9,000 · Human ServicesPRICHARD COMMITTEE FOR ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE INC — $520,000 · EducationPRICHARD …+4 more — $15,500 · EducationGREATER OWENSBORO LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE INC — $106,000 · Public BenefitGREEN RIVER ASSET BUILDING COALITION INC — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterDANIEL PITINO SHELTER INC — $9,000 · Housing & ShelterWYLDE CENTER INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureRIVERPARK CENTER INC — $2,993 · Arts & CultureCHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER INC — $10,000 · Environment
Other$5,320,028Human Services$632,700Education$535,500Public Benefit$106,000Housing & Shelter$29,000Arts & Culture$12,993Environment$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO KENTUCKY INC — $623,700 over 6y, 44% of budgetPRICHARD COMMITTEE FOR ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE INC — $520,000 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetFamily Y of Owensboro-Daviess Co — $306,904 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER OWENSBORO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC — $151,000 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetGREATER OWENSBORO LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE INC — $106,000 over 2y, 64% of budgetGREEN RIVER ASSET BUILDING COALITION INC — $20,000 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetHL NEBLETT COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $11,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetWYLDE CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDANIEL PITINO SHELTER INC — $9,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAUDUBON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARILYN & WILLIAM YOUNG CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC C/O SARA HEMINGWAY EX DI — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOWENSBORODAVIESS COUNTY REGIONAL DENTAL CLINIC INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCLIFF HAGAN BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC — $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBRESCIA UNIVERSITY INC — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPhilanthropy Southeast Inc — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF OWENSBORO-DAV COUNTY — $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WEST KENTUCKY INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRIVERPARK CENTER INC — $2,993 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE OWENSBORO INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS — $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPUZZLE PIECES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR COMMUNITY CENTER OF OWENSBORO-DAVIESS COUNTY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRESH START FOR WOMEN INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOULWARE MISSION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO KENTUCKY INC
  • Who funds PRICHARD COMMITTEE FOR ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE INC
  • Who funds Family Y of Owensboro-Daviess Co
  • Who funds GREATER OWENSBORO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC
  • Who funds GREATER OWENSBORO LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds GREEN RIVER ASSET BUILDING COALITION INC
  • Who funds HL NEBLETT COMMUNITY CENTER INC
  • Who funds WYLDE CENTER INC
  • Who funds CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER INC
  • Who funds DANIEL PITINO SHELTER INC
  • Who funds AUDUBON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds MARILYN & WILLIAM YOUNG CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC C/O SARA HEMINGWAY EX DI
  • Who funds KENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE
  • Who funds OWENSBORODAVIESS COUNTY REGIONAL DENTAL CLINIC INC
  • Who funds CLIFF HAGAN BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC
  • Who funds BRESCIA UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds Philanthropy Southeast Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Owensboro Health IncKY41× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Owensboro Health Inc · Marilyn & William Young Charitable Foundation Inc C/O Sara Hemingway Ex Di · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · United Way of the Ohio Valley Inc · Lester E Yeager Charitable Trust B · B J Killian Foundation · The Community Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Lawrence & Augusta Hager Educational Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · Impact 100 - Owensboro Inc · Baird Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Public Life Foundation of Owensboro funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Public Life Foundation of Owensboro?

    Find your warmest path to Public Life Foundation of Owensboro through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph