How much did BRYANT FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 90% of BRYANT FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

library

2021

—

2022

lacy

2023

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k29 grants · $34k
$10k–50k1 grant · $12k

$1,000

Median grant

States reached

$832k

Total assets

Largest grants

HILLYER$12,364
LACY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$5,500
METHODIST HOME FOR CHILDREN$4,000
WHIRLIGIG$2,500
OWENSBORO SYMPHONY$2,500
BROOKGREEN GARDENS$2,500
KK FUND$2,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT$1,300
YMCA OF OWENSBORO$1,100
YMCA WILSON$1,000
PITINO SHELTER$1,000
CAROLINA BALLET$1,000
OWENSBORO COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,000
GLOBAL MINISTRIES$1,000
MAKE A WISH$1,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 11%. 32% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$166k · 22 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$166k

$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%

+76%

Still filing today

36%

21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionEnvironmentAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BG
BROOKGREEN GARDENS
2× · 2023–2024 · $5k · revenue +31%
RA
ROBERT AUSTIN MEYTHALER FOUNDATION INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +111%
BM
BOULWARE MISSION
2× · 2021–2024 · $2k · revenue +12%

Funded once

MA
MARYLIN AND WILLIAM YOUNG FOUNDATION
one grant, 2021 · $1k
DO
DIVISION OF OVERSEAS MINISTRIES
one grant, 2023 · $1k
IL
IMAGINATION LIBRARY OF DAVIESS COUNTYgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +185%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Cincinnati Institute of Fine Arts

With funding, services, and advocacy, ArtsWave fuels a more vibrant economy and connected community through the arts.

Arts & Culture

Greenville Institute of the Arts

Leaf Institute of Art & Vocation is a unique community non-profit organization with focus on faith and work integration, thoughtful cultural events, and arts education.

—

Lewistown Art Center

Art appreciation for fergus county and the surrounding area.

Arts & Culture

Kentucky Humanities Council Inc

The kentucky humanities council is dedicated to telling kentucky's story through programs and services that create a legacy of pride in the wealth of kentucky's culture, building civic engagement, and supporting local humanities programs…

—

Ashley Gibson Barnett Museum of Art

Enhances the lives of our varied communities by bringing people and art together.

Arts & Culture

Andreas H Bechtler Arts Foundation

Sharing the joy and excellence of the bechtler collection with all in order to inspire, inform and enhance cultural and intellectual life.

Arts & Culture

Foundation for Daviess County Public

Provide support for the daviess county public schools

Philanthropy

The Frick Collection

The Frick Collection (the "Collection") operates an internationally recognized art museum and library program for the inspiration and enjoyment of the public and for the advancement of the study of fine arts and kindred subjects.

—

Behringer Crawford Museum

Cultural & historic museum in covington, ky. the museum is a center for the collection, presentation, study, and enjoyment of the natural, cultural, and visual &performing arts heritage of northern kentucky; in order to preserve the…

Arts & Culture

James Baker Hall Foundation Inc

1) (a) create an arts legacy museum in lexington, ky containing the kentucky artists hall of fame 2) (a) provide space, other than the museum, for artists to display their visual and written works of art 3) (a) award scholarship or grants…

Arts & Culture

Riverside Arts Center

The organization is a multi-purpose cultural arts venue providing performance, exhibit, studio and reception space for artists and art cultural organizations to enrich the ypsilanti community through the arts and cultural experiences. in…

Arts & Culture

Interlochen Center for the Arts

To support the interlochen arts group and the interlochen arts camp in the fulfillment of their educational and other purposes

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aid the Homeless Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hackett Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

19/20

Grantees still filing

18/20

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$188,796Human Services$8,200Environment$4,500Arts & Culture$3,300Education$2,450Philanthropy$1,000Housing & Shelter$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation OfKY23.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Of · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Lawrence & Augusta Hager Educational · Lester E Yeager Charitable Trust B · Marilyn & William Young Charitable · The Community Foundation of Louisville · Ge Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation BRYANT FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ROBERT AUSTIN MEYTHALER FOUNDATION INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.1× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 611406940 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ROBERT AUSTIN MEYTHALER FOUNDATION INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 4% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Bryant Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Bryant Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

BRYANT FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Bryant Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

BRYANT FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Bryant Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph