Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bruno Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$208kInternational$77kHealth$71kReligion$64kFood & Nutrition$15kYouth Development$13kHousing & Shelter$12kEducation$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$222k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRIST IS LIFE MINISTRIES$15,000
CHILDREN OF NEW HORIZONS$5,000
FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL MISSION$5,000
FIRST 15 DEVOTIONAL$3,000
THE GRACE CENTER$2,000
THE GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER$2,000
HILL COUNTY COMMUNITY NEEDS COUNCIL$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
HEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$1,000
OPERATION SMILE$1,000
FREDERICKSBURG FOOD PANTRY$1,000
WORLD VISION$1,000
EDEN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Buckner Foundation: $8k → 14%Buckner Foundation: $8k → 14%Buckner Foundation: $8k → 14%The Grace Center: $5k → 10%Buckner Foundation: $8k → 14%Buckner Foundation: $3k → 14%Buckner Foundation: $3k → 14%The Grace Center: $3k → 10%The Grace Center: $3k → 10%The Grace Center: $3k → 10%THE GRACE CENTER: $2k → 10%The Grace Center: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
NY
CT
CO
MO
NM
AR
TN
DC
MS
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$577k · 47 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

47 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
3

Total granted

$577k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+152%

Still filing today

36%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthEducationReligionHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BF
    BUCKNER FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $35k · revenue +120%
  • HC
    HILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY NEEDS COUNCIL
    8× · 2018–2025 · $25k · revenue +163%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $10k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • CF
    Cal Farley's Children Ranch
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • CM
    COMMISSION MINISTERS NETWORK
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +152%
  • CV
    Concho Valley Regional Food Bankgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hospice of South Texas Inc

Hospice care of terminally ill patients

—
2
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
3
Handicap International

Handicap international dba humanity & inclusion (hi) works with people with disabilities and people living in situations of vulnerability, including poverty, exclusion, conflict, and disaster.

International
4
Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion
5
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
6
Greater Austin Christian Foundation

Mobilizing resources by inspiring biblical generosity in the greater austin, texas area.

Religion
7
Buckner International

To provide management and administrative support for tax-exempt related entities.

Human Services
8
Healing Hands Ministries Inc

Hmm health provides quality healthcare to all its neighbors with love, compassion, and respect.

Health
9
Covenant Hospital Hobbs

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health
10
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of jesus christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
11
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
12
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Outreach International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Paralyzed Veterans of America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Children Of New Horizons: $48,500 · OtherChildren Of New HorizonsMake a Wish Foundation of West Texa: $43,500 · OtherMake a Wish Foundation of West TexaSt Judes Children's Research Hospit: $40,000 · OtherSt Judes Children's Research HospitIndividual grant recipient: $37,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $26,500 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILYHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY NEEDS COUNCIL: $25,000 · OtherHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY NEEDS COUNCILThe Salvation Army: $15,000 · Other+29 more: $165,250 · Other+29 moreCHRIST IS LIFE MINISTRIES: $55,500 · ReligionCHRIST IS L…COMMISSION MINISTERS NETWORK: $3,000 · ReligionBUCKNER FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesBUCKNER F…THE GRACE CENTER: $15,500 · Human ServicesTHE GRACE…HIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC: $25,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 · HealthPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $6,000 · HealthGLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $9,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC: $8,000 · InternationalCompassion International Incorporated: $4,500 · InternationalHEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $2,500 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · InternationalTHE MAY CENTER FOR LEARNING: $4,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,000 · EducationRECORDING LIBRARY OF WEST TEXAS: $2,500 · EducationHILL COUNTRY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $4,000 · Animals
Other$400,750Religion$58,500Human Services$50,500Health$41,000International$36,000Education$9,500Animals$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHRIST IS LIFE MINISTRIES: $55,500 over 5y, 6.4% of budgetBUCKNER FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC: $25,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY NEEDS COUNCIL: $25,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetTHE GRACE CENTER: $15,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetFREDERICKSBURG FOOD PANTRY INC: $13,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $8,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated: $4,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHILL COUNTRY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $4,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MAY CENTER FOR LEARNING: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRECORDING LIBRARY OF WEST TEXAS: $2,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS FOR THE ELDERLY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF SAN ANGELO INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetConcho Valley Regional Food Bank: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHRIST IS LIFE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds BUCKNER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds HILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY NEEDS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds THE GRACE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FREDERICKSBURG FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds HILL COUNTRY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds THE MAY CENTER FOR LEARNING ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX14.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Kathryn Nell Harrison Foundation Inc · Wayne & Jo Ann Moore Charitable Foundation · Abell-Hanger Foundation · Miramar Charitable Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bruno Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bruno Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bruno Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph