Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bruno Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$45k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$208kInternational$77kHealth$71kReligion$64kFood & Nutrition$15kYouth Development$13kHousing & Shelter$12kEducation$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $26k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$244k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Christ is Life Ministries$25,500
Children Of New Horizons$4,000
First 15 Devotional$3,000
Americares$1,000
Operation Smile$1,000
Fredericksburg Food Pantry$1,000
Eden Volunteer Fire Dept$1,000
Save the Children$1,000
The Grace Center$1,000
Hill Country Community Needs Counci$1,000
World Vision$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Heifer International Foundation$1,000
The Salvation Army$1,000
The Good Samaritan Center$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Buckner Foundation: $8k → 14%Buckner Foundation: $8k → 14%Buckner Foundation: $8k → 14%The Grace Center: $5k → 10%Buckner Foundation: $8k → 14%Buckner Foundation: $3k → 14%Buckner Foundation: $3k → 14%The Grace Center: $3k → 10%The Grace Center: $3k → 10%The Grace Center: $3k → 10%The Grace Center: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MN
NY
CT
CO
MO
NM
AR
TN
DC
MS
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$538k · 46 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

46 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
3

Total granted

$538k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+152%

Still filing today

35%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthEducationHuman ServicesReligionAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BF
    BUCKNER FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $35k · revenue +120%
  • HC
    HILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY NEEDS COUNCIL
    7× · 2018–2024 · $23k · revenue +163%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $10k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • CF
    Cal Farley's Children Ranch
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • CM
    COMMISSION MINISTERS NETWORK
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +152%
  • CV
    Concho Valley Regional Food Bankgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +40%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hospice of South Texas Inc

Hospice care of terminally ill patients

2
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
3
Handicap International

Handicap international dba humanity & inclusion (hi) works with people with disabilities and people living in situations of vulnerability, including poverty, exclusion, conflict, and disaster.

International
4
Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion
5
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
6
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
7
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
8
Greater Austin Christian Foundation

Mobilizing resources by inspiring biblical generosity in the greater austin, texas area.

Religion
9
Buckner International

To provide management and administrative support for tax-exempt related entities.

Human Services
10
Healing Hands Ministries Inc

Hmm health provides quality healthcare to all its neighbors with love, compassion, and respect.

Health
11
Covenant Hospital Hobbs

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health
12
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Outreach International Inc and the most unlike its peers is Paralyzed Veterans of America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Veteran Support ServicesPublic Library SupportChild and Family ServicesSenior Support ServicesFood Pantries & AssistanceCancer Support Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%0%<5yr16%5%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr10%27%35–55yr13%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr16%6%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr10%28%35–55yr13%22%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
15%
20,233/136,779

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Make a Wish Foundation of West Texa — $43,500 · OtherMake a Wish Foundation of West TexaChildren Of New Horizons — $43,500 · OtherChildren Of New HorizonsSt Judes Children's Research Hospit — $40,000 · OtherSt Judes Children's Research HospitIndividual grant recipient — $37,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFOCUS ON THE FAMILY — $26,500 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILYHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY NEEDS COUNCIL — $23,000 · OtherHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY NEEDS COUNCILThe Salvation Army — $14,000 · Other+27 more — $148,750 · Other+27 moreBUCKNER FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 · Human ServicesBUCKNER F…THE GRACE CENTER — $13,500 · Human ServicesTHE GRACE…CHRIST IS LIFE MINISTRIES — $40,500 · ReligionCOMMISSION MINISTERS NETWORK — $3,000 · ReligionHIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC — $25,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $10,000 · HealthPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $6,000 · HealthGLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC — $10,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc — $8,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC — $7,000 · InternationalCompassion International Incorporated — $4,500 · InternationalHEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $2,500 · International+1 more — $1,000 · InternationalTHE MAY CENTER FOR LEARNING — $4,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $3,000 · EducationRECORDING LIBRARY OF WEST TEXAS — $2,500 · EducationHILL COUNTRY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $3,500 · Animals
Other$376,250Human Services$48,500Religion$43,500Health$41,000International$33,000Education$9,500Animals$3,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHRIST IS LIFE MINISTRIES — $40,500 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetBUCKNER FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC — $25,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY NEEDS COUNCIL — $23,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTHE GRACE CENTER — $13,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFREDERICKSBURG FOOD PANTRY INC — $12,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC — $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC — $7,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated — $4,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAY CENTER FOR LEARNING — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHILL COUNTRY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $3,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRECORDING LIBRARY OF WEST TEXAS — $2,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF SAN ANGELO INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS FOR THE ELDERLY INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetConcho Valley Regional Food Bank — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHRIST IS LIFE MINISTRIES
  • Who funds BUCKNER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC
  • Who funds HILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY NEEDS COUNCIL
  • Who funds THE GRACE CENTER
  • Who funds FREDERICKSBURG FOOD PANTRY INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds GLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC
  • Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated
  • Who funds THE MAY CENTER FOR LEARNING
  • Who funds HILL COUNTRY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
  • Who funds COMMISSION MINISTERS NETWORK

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX14.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Kathryn Nell Harrison Foundation Inc · Wayne & Jo Ann Moore Charitable Foundation · Abell-Hanger Foundation · Miramar Charitable Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bruno Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph