Skip to content

· Private foundation

Brinkley Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$127kHealth$99kPhilanthropy$92kEnvironment$85kAnimals$76kFood & Nutrition$60kEducation$46kCrime & Legal$45kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$739k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY$10,000
CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC$10,000
WILD CARE FOUNDATION$10,000
REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA$10,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$10,000
MARY ABBOTT CHILDREN'S HOUSE INC$6,000
BETHESDA ALTERNATIVE INC$6,000
BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC$5,000
THE VIRTURE CENTER$4,000
OETA FOUNDATION$3,000
THE SOONER THEATER$2,000
NORMAN REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION$2,000
CITIZENS ADVISORY BOARD$2,000
FIREHOUSE ART CENTER$2,000
TRANSITION HOUSE$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $20k → 13%CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $10k → 13%CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $10k → 13%CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $10k → 13%CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $10k → 13%CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $10k → 13%CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $10k → 13%CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $10k → 13%CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $10k → 13%THE BRIDGES FOUNDATION: $4k → 15%BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC: $5k → 13%BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC: $5k → 13%BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC: $5k → 13%BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC: $5k → 13%BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC: $5k → 13%BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC: $4k → 13%BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC: $4k → 13%BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC: $4k → 13%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF NORMAN: $1k → 13%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF NORMAN: $1k → 13%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF NORMAN: $1k → 13%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF NORMAN: $1k → 13%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF NORMAN: $1k → 13%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF NORMAN: $1k → 13%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF NORMAN: $1k → 13%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF NORMAN: $1k → 13%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF NORMAN: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 28% of Brinkley Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in OK; by stated purpose, 87%.

Brinkley Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$591k · 17 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
3

Total granted

$591k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+47%

Still filing today

82%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsCrime & LegalArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $100k · revenue +60%
  • WF
    WILDCARE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $76k · revenue +191%
  • REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BRIDGES FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue +47%
  • NA
    NORMAN ADDICTION INFORMATION AND COUNSELING
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • PH
    PARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Hope House Inc

Family Hope House empowers families through therapy, education, and advocacy. As Oklahoma's sole adoption competent mental health agency, we support foster and adoptive children for lasting stability and success.

Health
2
North Oklahoma County Mental Health Center

NorthCare offers a variety of services for children, adults, and families, designed to help you, your child, and your family recover from mental illness, substance use, trauma, or crisis to live a life in recovery.

Health
3
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
4
Northeastern Oklahoma Council On Alcoholism

The organization is engaged in the service of rehabilitating users of alcohol and drugs. the center is also involved in community service programs, dui schools and out-patient counseling.

Health
5
Care Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc Dba the Care Center

The CARE Center exists to reduce trauma for child abuse victims and their families, coordinate a multidisciplinary approach to child abuse investigations, and provide free, effective child abuse prevention resources and education.

Human Services
6
Youth & Family Services North Central Ok

To provide mental health and substance abuse counseling to chiildren, youth, families, and adults; to provide a 24 hr/7 days a week youth shelter and to work closely with other agencies to keep families together

Housing & Shelter
7
Child Advocacy Center of Central Ok Inc

The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…

Human Services
8
Okmulgee County Family Resource Ctr

Crisis intervention services and full shelter for victims and their children of domestic violence/sexual assault. Advocates for abused children in the court system.

Human Services
9
Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers

Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers, Inc. serves the community behavioral health needs of nine counties of Southern Oklahoma. Lighthouse offers integrated care through their outpatient and Health Home programs to adults and children.…

Health
10
Help in Crisis Inc

Our mission is to eliminate family violence, stalking, child abuse, and sexual assault through advocacy, education, counseling, support and prevention services.

Human Services
11
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
12
Okanogan Behavioral Healthcare

Obhc is dedicated to providing high-quality behavioral health services to individuals of all ages and diverse cultural or ethnic backgrounds. obhc offers substance use counseling, case management, and skills training for those with…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Norman Regional Health Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Oklahoma Educational Television Authority Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY: $90,000 · OtherUNITED WAYTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $85,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYFostering Futures Inc: $18,000 · OtherFostering Futures IncTHE SOONER THEATER: $14,000 · OtherTHE SOONER THEATEROklahoma Educational Television Authority Foundation Inc: $13,000 · OtherOklahoma Educational Television Authorit…KATHERYNE B PAYNE EDUCATION CENTER: $9,000 · OtherNORMAN FIREHOUSE ART CENTER INC: $11,000 · Other+2 more: $3,000 · OtherCENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR CHILDREN & FA…BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC: $37,000 · Human ServicesBRIDGES OF NORMAN INCAssistance League of Norman Inc: $9,000 · Human ServicesAssistance League of Nor…+1 more: $4,000 · Human ServicesBETHESDA INC: $43,000 · HealthBETHESDA INCNorman Alcohol Information Center Inc: $20,000 · HealthNorman Alcohol …Transition House Inc: $18,000 · HealthTransition Hous…NORMAN REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $12,000 · HealthNORMAN REGIONAL…+1 more: $1,000 · HealthWILDCARE FOUNDATION: $76,000 · AnimalsWILDCARE FOU…REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $60,000 · Food & NutritionREGIONAL …MARY ABBOTT CHILDREN'S HOUSE: $45,000 · Crime & LegalFOOD AND SHELTER INC: $16,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$243,000Human Services$150,000Health$94,000Animals$76,000Food & Nutrition$60,000Crime & Legal$45,000Housing & Shelter$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $100,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $85,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWILDCARE FOUNDATION: $76,000 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMARY ABBOTT CHILDREN'S HOUSE: $45,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetBETHESDA INC: $43,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetBRIDGES OF NORMAN INC: $37,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetNorman Alcohol Information Center Inc: $20,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetFostering Futures Inc: $18,000 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetTransition House Inc: $18,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetFOOD AND SHELTER INC: $16,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOklahoma Educational Television Authority Foundation Inc: $13,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNORMAN REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetNORMAN FIREHOUSE ART CENTER INC: $11,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetKATHERYNE B PAYNE EDUCATION CENTER: $9,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetAssistance League of Norman Inc: $9,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BRIDGES FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTEEN RECOVERY SOLUTIONS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds WILDCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds MARY ABBOTT CHILDREN'S HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds BETHESDA INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC ↗
  • Who funds Norman Alcohol Information Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Fostering Futures Inc ↗
  • Who funds Transition House Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOD AND SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma Educational Television Authority Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORMAN REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORMAN FIREHOUSE ART CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds KATHERYNE B PAYNE EDUCATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Assistance League of Norman Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEEN RECOVERY SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds PARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK25.5× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Norman Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Richard L and Charlotte Reynolds Family Trust Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · Oec Foundation · Philip Boyle Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · American Fidelity Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brinkley Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brinkley Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Food and Shelter Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Brinkley Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph