· Private foundation
Richard L and Charlotte Reynolds Family Trust Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $6k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $205k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORMAN ALCOHOL INFORMATION CENTER DBA THE VIRTUE CENTER | $40,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES | $20,000 |
| MARY ABBOTT CHILDREN'S HOUSE | $20,000 |
| NORMAN REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| FOOD AND SHELTER INC | $20,000 |
| BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC | $20,000 |
| NORMAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| BETHESDA | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITY MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH | $10,000 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS OF NORMAN INC | $10,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF NORMAN | $5,000 |
| TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $171k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
20 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC6× · 2020–2025 · $85k · revenue +67%- NPNORMAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION6× · 2020–2025 · $70k · revenue +44%
- NANorman Alcohol Information Center Inc2× · 2022–2023 · $55k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- CACommunity After School Program Incone grant, 2024 · $5k
- NPNORMAN PARK FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +188%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide support to NWOSU and scholarships to NWOSU students
Assistance League of Norman is an all-volunteer nonprofit organization dedicated to transforming lives of children and families through our community programs.
NorthCare offers a variety of services for children, adults, and families, designed to help you, your child, and your family recover from mental illness, substance use, trauma, or crisis to live a life in recovery.
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.
The organization is engaged in the service of rehabilitating users of alcohol and drugs. the center is also involved in community service programs, dui schools and out-patient counseling.
To enhance the educational opportunities and environment at Northern Oklahoma College as set forth in the Foundation's articles and the mission statement of the college
The corporation is organized to hold and manage real estate as part of the charitable purpose to benefit, perform the functions of, or carry out the charitable purposes of north oklahoma county mental health center d/b/a northcare, an…
The CARE Center exists to reduce trauma for child abuse victims and their families, coordinate a multidisciplinary approach to child abuse investigations, and provide free, effective child abuse prevention resources and education.
Improving the quality of life of norman residents through the creation and retention of jobs.
Childrens House varied Curriculm follws the Montessori method. Principle areas of learning include Practical Life Skills, Language Development, Math, Science, Geography, Art,French, Music,Cultural Studies and Farm School.
The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Norman Regional Health Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Norman Park Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FOOD AND SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds NORMAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Norman Alcohol Information Center Inc ↗
- Who funds BETHESDA INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NORMAN REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MARY ABBOTT CHILDREN'S HOUSE ↗
- Who funds Meals on Wheels of Norman Inc ↗
- Who funds United Way of Norman Inc ↗
- Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORMAN PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Brinkley Family Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Norman Inc · Philip Boyle Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Oec Foundation · Oge Energy Corp Foundation Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Jimmie Lynn and Billye Austin Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Richard L and Charlotte Reynolds Family Trust Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Tulsa Community Foundation — 11% of income from government
- Food and Shelter Inc — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.