Skip to content
Brighton Community Hospital Association at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Brighton Community Hospital Association

Helping people live the healthiest lives possible.

$819k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.7MHousing & Shelter$498kFood & Nutrition$365kHuman Services$279kYouth Development$173kReligion$30kEducation$24kCommunity Improvement$24kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $642,585, the rows itemized in this filing. The $818,611 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $176,026 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $430k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$190M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLATTE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$200,272
BENEFITS IN ACTION$46,000
ALMOST HOME INC$45,000
PENNOCK CENTER FOR COUNSELING$40,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO$35,000
FOOD FOR HOPE$35,000
RALSTON HOUSE$32,000
COLORADO MISSION OF MERCY INC$30,000
HOUSING AUTHORITY CITY OF BRIG$30,000
WELD FOOD BANK$25,000
NORTH RANGE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$21,113
RICHARD LAMBERT FOUNDATION$20,000
VIA MOBILITY SERVICES$20,000
HOPE AT MIRACLE HOUSE$20,000
CASA OF ADAMS & BROOMFIELD$16,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $369k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 7%A PRECIOUS CHILD INC: $15k → 5%BENEFITS IN ACTION: $46k → 7%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $24k → 12%PRECIOUS CHILD INC: $15k → 5%BENEFITS IN ACTION: $43k → 7%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $20k → 12%A PRECIOUS CHILD INC: $10k → 5%BENEFITS IN ACTION: $42k → 7%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $20k → 12%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $10k → 5%CASA: $12k → 10%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $15k → 12%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $15k → 12%CASA OF ADAMS & BROOMFIELD: $16k → 10%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $10k → 12%CASA OF ADAMS & BROOMFIELD: $13k → 10%CASA OF ADAMS & BROOMFIELD: $12k → 10%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $10k → 10%CASA: $10k → 10%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 76% of Brighton Community Hospital Association’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in CO; by stated purpose, 26%.

Brighton Community Hospital Associationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 21 repeat orgs$112k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
5

Total granted

$3.0M
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+90%

Still filing today

81%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $62k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionHealthPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PV
    PLATTE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +35% · 46% of their budget
  • AH
    Almost Home Inc
    5× · 2019–2024 · $248k · revenue +698%
  • BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $160k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • FO
    Friends of Barr Lake
    one grant, 2023 · $13k
  • WC
    Weld County School District 8
    one grant, 2019 · $12k
  • CO
    CITY OF FORT LUPTON
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Meals On Wheels of Boulder Inc

The mission of meals on wheels is to provide nutritious meals to residents of the community who need and want their services, regardless of age or income.

Food & Nutrition
2
Boulder Shelter for the Homeless Inc

To create avenues to stable housing for our community's homeless adults, from a foundation of supportive and safe shelter.

Housing & Shelter
3
Urban Outreach Denver

Urban Outreach Denver exists to connect people to God and to a community of support by caring for both short-term and long-term needs in the areas of food, clothing, shlter, medical care, education and job preparation.

Human Services
4
Boulder Community Housing Corporation Inc

The mission statement of Boulder Community Housing Organization is to provide quality, affordable homes and foster thriving communities. They aim to create a diverse, inclusive, and sustainable Boulder by offering affordable housing…

Housing & Shelter
5
Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council

Cbhc's mission is to support community resilience, guide behavioral health innovation, and enhance individual well-being throughout colorado by supporting colorado's community behavioral health safety net providers.

Health
6
San Juan Basin Area Agency On Aging Incorporated

San juan basin area agency on aging is dedicated to serving elderly residents (over age 60) throughout southwest colorado in accordance with the administration on aging, providing advocacy, and planning and delivering essential services,…

—
7
Feeding Colorado

The mission of feeding colorado, which represents the five feeding america food banks in the state, is to improve food security in colorado through policy, advocacy, partnership, and education.

Food & Nutrition
8
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
9
Senior Support Services

To provide senior homeless adults in the denver metro area with hot meals, clothing, transportation, and assistance with securing government benefits and affordable housing.

Human Services
10
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless

The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…

Human Services
11
Four Corners Community Behavioral Health Inc

Four corners community behavioral health inc is licensed under utah code annotated title 62a to provide mental health and substance abuse services. it is the designated medicaid service provider and sole source mental health and substance…

—
12
Dental Aid

Dental aid strives to improve the quality of life of children and adults struggling to afford health care by providing compassionate, high quality dental care and education, while advocating to ensure access to care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brothers Redevelopment Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Barr Lake. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLATTE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $1,323,352 · OtherPLATTE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONPENNOCK CENTER FOR COUNSELING: $205,400 · OtherPENNOCK CENTER FOR COUNSELINGBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC: $160,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INCHOUSING AUTHORITY CITY OF BRIG: $95,000 · Other+9 more: $170,607 · Other+9 moreBENEFITS IN ACTION: $131,102 · Human ServicesBENEFITS IN A…Via Mobility Services: $104,000 · Human ServicesVia Mobility …A PRECIOUS CHILD INC: $70,000 · Human ServicesA PRECIOUS CH…CASA of Adams & Broomfield Counties: $63,400 · Human ServicesCASA of Adams…Almost Home Inc: $247,750 · Housing & ShelterAlmost Home …HOPE AT MIRACLE HOUSE: $85,000 · Housing & ShelterHOPE AT MIRA…BROTHERS REDEVELOPMENT INC: $24,000 · Housing & ShelterBROTHERS RED…FOOD FOR HOPE: $110,000 · Food & NutritionWELD FOOD BANK: $97,000 · Food & NutritionFriends of Barr Lake: $13,081 · Food & NutritionRICHARD LAMBERT FOUNDATION: $115,000 · PhilanthropyNORTH RANGE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $48,113 · HealthTHE COLORADO MISSION OF MERCY: $30,000 · HealthRalston House: $32,000 · Community ImprovementSCHOOL DISTRICT 27J CAPITAL FACILITY FEE FOUNDATION: $24,000 · Education
Other$1,954,359Human Services$368,502Housing & Shelter$356,750Food & Nutrition$220,081Philanthropy$115,000Health$78,113Community Improvement$32,000Education$24,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLATTE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $1,323,352 over 8y, 46% of budgetAlmost Home Inc: $247,750 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetPENNOCK CENTER FOR COUNSELING: $205,400 over 5y, 18% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC: $160,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBENEFITS IN ACTION: $131,102 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetRICHARD LAMBERT FOUNDATION: $115,000 over 6y, 14% of budgetFOOD FOR HOPE: $110,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetVia Mobility Services: $104,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWELD FOOD BANK: $97,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE AT MIRACLE HOUSE: $85,000 over 4y, 61% of budgetA PRECIOUS CHILD INC: $70,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCASA of Adams & Broomfield Counties: $63,400 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetNORTH RANGE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $48,113 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOLD WEATHER CARE: $45,850 over 2y, 20% of budgetRalston House: $32,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE COLORADO MISSION OF MERCY: $30,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetSCHOOL DISTRICT 27J CAPITAL FACILITY FEE FOUNDATION: $24,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetBROTHERS REDEVELOPMENT INC: $24,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $18,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetSOUTHEAST WELD COUNTY JUNIOR FAIR ASSOC ASSOCIATION: $13,457 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTHE SENIOR HUB INC: $9,200 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGREATER BRIGHTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5,500 over 1y, 4.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives Founda…The Colorado Health F…Anschutz Family Found…Brighton Legacy Found…The Denver FoundationMile High United Way …United Power Round Up…The Weld TrustXcel Energy FoundationRose Community Founda…El Pomar FoundationBroomfield Community …
Colorado Gives FoundationCO23.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Brighton Legacy Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · United Power Round Up Foundation · The Weld Trust · Xcel Energy Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Broomfield Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brighton Community Hospital Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brighton Community Hospital Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brighton Community Hospital Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home