Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Brighton Community Hospital Association

Helping people live the healthiest lives possible.

$819k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$1.7MHousing & Shelter$498kFood & Nutrition$365kHuman Services$279kYouth Development$173kReligion$30kEducation$24kCommunity Improvement$24kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 18 grants below total $642,585 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $818,611 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $176,026 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $430k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$190M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLATTE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$200,272
BENEFITS IN ACTION$46,000
ALMOST HOME INC$45,000
PENNOCK CENTER FOR COUNSELING$40,000
FOOD FOR HOPE$35,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO$35,000
RALSTON HOUSE$32,000
HOUSING AUTHORITY CITY OF BRIG$30,000
COLORADO MISSION OF MERCY INC$30,000
WELD FOOD BANK$25,000
NORTH RANGE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$21,113
HOPE AT MIRACLE HOUSE$20,000
VIA MOBILITY SERVICES$20,000
RICHARD LAMBERT FOUNDATION$20,000
CASA OF ADAMS & BROOMFIELD$16,200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $369k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 7%A PRECIOUS CHILD INC: $15k → 5%BENEFITS IN ACTION: $46k → 7%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $24k → 12%PRECIOUS CHILD INC: $15k → 5%BENEFITS IN ACTION: $43k → 7%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $20k → 12%A PRECIOUS CHILD INC: $10k → 5%BENEFITS IN ACTION: $42k → 7%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $20k → 12%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $10k → 5%CASA: $12k → 10%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $15k → 12%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $15k → 12%CASA OF ADAMS & BROOMFIELD: $16k → 10%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $10k → 12%CASA OF ADAMS & BROOMFIELD: $13k → 10%CASA OF ADAMS & BROOMFIELD: $12k → 10%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $10k → 10%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $10k → 10%CASA: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 76% of Brighton Community Hospital Association’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in CO; read by stated purpose it is 26% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Brighton Community Hospital Associationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.0M · 21 repeat orgs$112k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
5

Total granted

$3.0M
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+90%

Still filing today

81%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $62k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionHealthPhilanthropyEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PV
    PLATTE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +61% · 46% of their budget
  • AH
    Almost Home Inc
    5× · 2019–2024 · $248k · revenue +698%
  • BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $160k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • FO
    Friends of Barr Lake
    one grant, 2023 · $13k
  • WC
    Weld County School District 8
    one grant, 2019 · $12k
  • CO
    CITY OF FORT LUPTON
    one grant, 2023 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boulder Community Housing Corporation Inc

The mission statement of Boulder Community Housing Organization is to provide quality, affordable homes and foster thriving communities. They aim to create a diverse, inclusive, and sustainable Boulder by offering affordable housing…

Housing & Shelter
2
Meals On Wheels of Boulder Inc

The mission of meals on wheels is to provide nutritious meals to residents of the community who need and want their services, regardless of age or income.

Food & Nutrition
3
Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council

Cbhc's mission is to support community resilience, guide behavioral health innovation, and enhance individual well-being throughout colorado by supporting colorado's community behavioral health safety net providers.

Health
4
Boulder Shelter for the Homeless Inc

To create avenues to stable housing for our community's homeless adults, from a foundation of supportive and safe shelter.

Housing & Shelter
5
Urban Outreach Denver

Urban Outreach Denver exists to connect people to God and to a community of support by caring for both short-term and long-term needs in the areas of food, clothing, shlter, medical care, education and job preparation.

Human Services
6
Four Corners Community Behavioral Health Inc

Four corners community behavioral health inc is licensed under utah code annotated title 62a to provide mental health and substance abuse services. it is the designated medicaid service provider and sole source mental health and substance…

7
Feeding Colorado

The mission of feeding colorado, which represents the five feeding america food banks in the state, is to improve food security in colorado through policy, advocacy, partnership, and education.

Food & Nutrition
8
Dental Aid

Dental aid strives to improve the quality of life of children and adults struggling to afford health care by providing compassionate, high quality dental care and education, while advocating to ensure access to care.

Health
9
San Juan Basin Area Agency On Aging Incorporated

San juan basin area agency on aging is dedicated to serving elderly residents (over age 60) throughout southwest colorado in accordance with the administration on aging, providing advocacy, and planning and delivering essential services,…

10
Colorado Food Cluster Inc

Provide opportunities for all to thrive by offering free food resources to communities.

Food & Nutrition
11
Boulder County Aids Project

Bcap's mission is to provide support, advocacy and education to those in our community who are living with or affected by hiv, and to serve as an outreach and information center to prevent the further transmission of hiv.

Health
12
Clinica Colorado

To provide equitable primary health care and resources to those with limited access across colorado, especially to those who are uninsured.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pennock Center for Counseling and the most unlike its peers is Greater Brighton Economic Development Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIntellectual and Developmen…Healthcare Systems and Serv…Animal Rescue and Shelter S…Regional Economic Developme…Supportive Housing & Life T…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%4%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%22%10–20yr14%30%20–35yr11%35%35–55yr16%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%5%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr14%21%20–35yr11%57%35–55yr16%7%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 7% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
7%
2/29
the rest of the field
14%
844/6,040

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/24
Grantees still filing
19/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PLATTE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $1,323,352 · OtherPLATTE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONPENNOCK CENTER FOR COUNSELING — $205,400 · OtherPENNOCK CENTER FOR COUNSELINGBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC — $160,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INCHOUSING AUTHORITY CITY OF BRIG — $95,000 · Other+9 more — $170,607 · Other+9 moreBENEFITS IN ACTION — $131,102 · Human ServicesBENEFITS IN A…Via Mobility Services — $104,000 · Human ServicesVia Mobility …A PRECIOUS CHILD INC — $70,000 · Human ServicesA PRECIOUS CH…CASA of Adams & Broomfield Counties — $63,400 · Human ServicesCASA of Adams…Almost Home Inc — $247,750 · Housing & ShelterAlmost Home …HOPE AT MIRACLE HOUSE — $85,000 · Housing & ShelterHOPE AT MIRA…BROTHERS REDEVELOPMENT INC — $24,000 · Housing & ShelterBROTHERS RED…FOOD FOR HOPE — $110,000 · Food & NutritionWELD FOOD BANK — $97,000 · Food & NutritionFriends of Barr Lake — $13,081 · Food & NutritionRICHARD LAMBERT FOUNDATION — $115,000 · PhilanthropyNORTH RANGE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $48,113 · HealthTHE COLORADO MISSION OF MERCY — $30,000 · HealthRalston House — $32,000 · Community ImprovementSCHOOL DISTRICT 27J CAPITAL FACILITY FEE FOUNDATION — $24,000 · Education
Other$1,954,359Human Services$368,502Housing & Shelter$356,750Food & Nutrition$220,081Philanthropy$115,000Health$78,113Community Improvement$32,000Education$24,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPLATTE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $1,323,352 over 8y, 46% of budgetAlmost Home Inc — $247,750 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetPENNOCK CENTER FOR COUNSELING — $205,400 over 5y, 18% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC — $160,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBENEFITS IN ACTION — $131,102 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetRICHARD LAMBERT FOUNDATION — $115,000 over 6y, 14% of budgetFOOD FOR HOPE — $110,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetVia Mobility Services — $104,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWELD FOOD BANK — $97,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE AT MIRACLE HOUSE — $85,000 over 4y, 61% of budgetA PRECIOUS CHILD INC — $70,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCASA of Adams & Broomfield Counties — $63,400 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetNORTH RANGE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $48,113 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOLD WEATHER CARE — $45,850 over 2y, 20% of budgetRalston House — $32,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE COLORADO MISSION OF MERCY — $30,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetSCHOOL DISTRICT 27J CAPITAL FACILITY FEE FOUNDATION — $24,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetBROTHERS REDEVELOPMENT INC — $24,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $18,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetSOUTHEAST WELD COUNTY JUNIOR FAIR ASSOC ASSOCIATION — $13,457 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTHE SENIOR HUB INC — $9,200 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGREATER BRIGHTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $5,500 over 1y, 4.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO23.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Brighton Legacy Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · United Power Round Up Foundation · The Weld Trust · Xcel Energy Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Broomfield Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Brighton Community Hospital Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph