Skip to content

· Private foundation

Brettkelly Famliy Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$240kRecreation & Sports$54kYouth Development$43kArts & Culture$24kReligion$13kScience & Tech$10kHuman Services$7kHealth$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$458k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YALE UNIVERSITY$25,000
SQUASH DRIVE$15,000
ANGEL CITY SPORTS$10,000
SCHOOL YEAR ABROAD$1,000
ABILITY PATH$1,000
SWIM ACCROSS AMERICA$500
COFAM$399
U C BERKELEY FOUNDATION$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ANGEL CITY SPORTS: $10k → 14%ANGEL CITY SPORTS: $5k → 14%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$345k · 19 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against -37% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
15

Total granted

$345k
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
-37%

Still filing today

47%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentEmploymentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • S
    SQUASHDRIVE
    4× · 2018–2025 · $37k · revenue +28%
  • UH
    UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL
    3× · 2018–2024 · $27k · revenue +21%
  • AT
    ACHIEVE TAHOE
    7× · 2018–2024 · $8k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $13k
  • SF
    S F DEBUTANTE BALL
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
  • SY
    SCHOOL YEAR ABROAD
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

—
2
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
3
San Francisco University High School

At san franicisco university high school, we engage our community of diverse voices in a transformational experience that embraces the spirited pursuit of learning and empowers purpose larger than self.

Education
4
San Francisco Friends School

At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…

Education
5
San Francisco Girls' School

To educate and inspire girls to become innovators and leaders in stem.

—
6
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
7
Marin Academy

Marin academy asks every individual to think, question, and create in an environment of encouragement and compassion, and challenges each person to accept the responsibilities posed by education in a democratic society.

Education
8
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
9
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
10
Presidio Hill School

Presidio hill school is a co-ed k-8 independent, progressive school. learning is collaborative and an active experience with an emphasis on inquiry. students are engaged in their own learning and guided by an expert faculty through a…

Education
11
Harbor School

Inspiring young scholars to contribute their wisdom, compassion, and personal best in the classroom, the community and the world.

Education
12
Hillbrook School

Hillbrook provides an extraordinary educational experience that fosters a love of learning in our students and helps them to develop the knowledge, skills and confidence to achieve their highest individual potential in school and in life.…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Abilitypath; the most unlike its peers is Museum of Dance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SF UNIVERSITY HS: $101,500 · OtherSF UNIVERSITY HSYALE UNIVERSITY: $62,500 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYSQUASH DRIVE: $24,000 · OtherSQUASH DRIVEKATHERINE DELMAR BURKE SCHOOL: $22,000 · OtherKATHERINE DELMAR BURKE SCHOOLYALE UNIVERSITY: $12,500 · Other+22 more: $79,121 · Other+22 moreSQUASHDRIVE: $36,900 · EducationSQUASHDRIVEUNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $26,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY HIGH SCH…President and Fellows of Harvard College: $10,000 · EducationPresident and Fello…Angel City Alliance: $15,000 · Human ServicesLITTLE WISHES: $6,000 · Human ServicesCOMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $2,000 · Human ServicesMUSEUM OF DANCE: $7,800 · Arts & CultureNANTUCKET DREAMLAND FOUNDATION INC: $500 · Arts & CultureHarper For Kids Inc: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentABILITYPATH: $4,250 · EmploymentSCHOOL YEAR ABROAD INC: $1,000 · International
Other$301,621Education$73,400Human Services$23,000Arts & Culture$8,300Youth Development$6,000Employment$4,250International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSQUASHDRIVE: $36,900 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $26,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetKATHERINE DELMAR BURKE SCHOOL: $22,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAngel City Alliance: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACHIEVE TAHOE: $8,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetMUSEUM OF DANCE: $7,800 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetLITTLE WISHES: $6,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetHarper For Kids Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetABILITYPATH: $4,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOOL YEAR ABROAD INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSwim Across America Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET DREAMLAND FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SQUASHDRIVE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds KATHERINE DELMAR BURKE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Angel City Alliance ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds ACHIEVE TAHOE ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF DANCE ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE WISHES ↗
  • Who funds Harper For Kids Inc ↗
  • Who funds ABILITYPATH ↗
  • Who funds COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL YEAR ABROAD INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Swim Across America Inc ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET DREAMLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Marin Community Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brettkelly Famliy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brettkelly Famliy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Nantucket Dreamland Foundation Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Brettkelly Famliy Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Brettkelly Famliy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Brettkelly Famliy’s filings →

More from the funding graph