Skip to content

· Private foundation

Brenda & Dave Rickey Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$674k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$325k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Human Services$811kArts & Culture$507kYouth Development$308kHealth$194kSocial Science$175kEnvironment$140kEducation$127kAnimals$73kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $176k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
  • $250k+1 grant · $325k
$10,800
Median grant
5
States reached
$8.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE GENEVA FAMILY YMCA$325,000
FINGER LAKES LAND TRUST$100,000
LA JOLLA INSTITUTE$50,000
ST PETERS COMMUNITY ARTS ACADEMY$30,000
THE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION$25,000
SPIRIT OF THE FOURTH INC$25,000
FINGER LAKES HEALTH FOUNDATION$25,000
HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGE$20,000
GENEVA MUSIC FESTIVAL$15,000
SMITH OPERA HOUSE$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,800
HELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER$10,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$5,000
ST PAUL FULL GOSPEL BAPTIST CHURCH$3,500
GENEVA COMMUNITY CENTER$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $663k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OUR LADY OF PEACE: $5k → 14%THE GENEVA FAMILY YMCA: $325k → 10%OUR LADY OF PEACE: $3k → 14%THE GENEVA FAMILY YMCA: $277k → 10%THE GENEVA FAMILY YMCA: $50k → 10%THE GENEVA FAMILY YMCA: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
IA
OH
CA
VA
DE
AZ
NC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 25 repeat orgs$185k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
27

Total granted

$2.2M
$153k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+21%

Still filing today

56%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YM
    YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GENEVA NEW YORK INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $655k · revenue +454%
  • FINGER LAKES HEALTH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2024 · $180k · revenue +453%
  • SP
    St Peter's Community Arts Academy Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $144k · revenue +85%

Funded once

  • Y
    YMCA
    one grant, 2019 · $41k
  • TC
    THE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • SM
    ST MICHAEL CHURCH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Randolph College Inc

See detailed description of organization's primary mission provided on schedule o

Education
3
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
4
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
5
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
6
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
7
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
8
Geneva College

Geneva college is a christ-centered academic community that provides a comprehensive education to equip students for faithful and fruitful service to god and neighbor.

Education
9
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
10
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
11
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
12
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Smith Center for the Arts Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rbhs Gridiron Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
22/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LA JOLLA INSTITUTE: $175,000 · OtherLA JOLLA INSTITUTEBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GENEVA INC: $125,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GENEVA INCGENEVA BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $118,500 · OtherGENEVA BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBGENEVA COMMUNITY CENTER: $103,000 · OtherGENEVA COMMUNITY CENTERSMITH OPERA HOUSE: $95,000 · OtherSMITH OPERA HOUSESDSU CAMPANILE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherYMCA: $40,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER SAN DIEGO: $62,450 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER SAN DIEGO+33 more: $179,928 · Other+33 moreYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GENEVA NEW YORK INC: $654,500 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIO…+2 more: $13,000 · Human ServicesSt Peter's Community Arts Academy Inc: $144,000 · Arts & CultureSt Peter's Com…GENEVA MUSIC FESTIVAL INC: $85,000 · Arts & CultureGENEVA MUSIC F…SPIRIT OF THE FOURTH INC: $77,000 · Arts & CultureSPIRIT OF THE …+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureFINGER LAKES HEALTH FOUNDATION: $180,000 · Health+1 more: $1,175 · HealthThe Finger Lakes Land Trust Inc: $138,500 · EnvironmentMarietta College: $41,000 · EducationTHE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationHOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES: $20,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Education+1 more: $2,000 · EducationHELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER: $73,000 · Animals
Other$949,378Human Services$667,500Arts & Culture$311,000Health$181,175Environment$138,500Education$98,000Animals$73,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GENEVA NEW YORK INC: $654,500 over 4y, 19% of budgetFINGER LAKES HEALTH FOUNDATION: $180,000 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetSt Peter's Community Arts Academy Inc: $144,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetThe Finger Lakes Land Trust Inc: $138,500 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GENEVA INC: $125,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetGENEVA MUSIC FESTIVAL INC: $85,000 over 6y, 20% of budgetSPIRIT OF THE FOURTH INC: $77,000 over 5y, 28% of budgetHELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER: $73,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER SAN DIEGO: $62,450 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMarietta College: $41,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMITH CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $15,400 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSan Diego Council on Literacy: $8,899 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetOUR LADY OF PEACE: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGENEVA LIGHT OPERA: $5,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetCAROUSEL RANCH INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRBHS GRIDIRON CLUB: $2,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $1,175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARNOT OGDEN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION OF SMALL FOUNDATIONS: $298 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GENEVA NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds FINGER LAKES HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds St Peter's Community Arts Academy Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Finger Lakes Land Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GENEVA INC ↗
  • Who funds GENEVA MUSIC FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SPIRIT OF THE FOURTH INC ↗
  • Who funds HELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds Marietta College ↗
  • Who funds THE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES ↗
  • Who funds SMITH CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
  • Who funds San Diego Council on Literacy ↗
  • Who funds OUR LADY OF PEACE ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GENEVA LIGHT OPERA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Wyckoff Family Foundation IncNY20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Wyckoff Family Foundation Inc · Williams Family Foundation · Max and Marian Farash Charitable Foundation · Rochester Area Community Foundation · Fred L Emerson Foundation Inc · Seneca Foods Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brenda & Dave Rickey Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brenda & Dave Rickey Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brenda & Dave Rickey Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph