Skip to content

· Private foundation

Brad Sethness Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$243k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$282kRecreation & Sports$245kFood & Nutrition$241kEducation$240kHuman Services$169kArts & Culture$70kHousing & Shelter$70kAnimals$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $213k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDES CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPIT$28,000
HATCHER ALPINE EXPERIENCE$25,000
BEAN'S CAFE THE CHILDRENS LUNCHBOX$20,000
YWCA$20,000
HATCHER PASS AVALANCHE CENTER$15,000
PAUL B SHARAR FOUNDATION$15,000
CHALLENGE ALASKA$10,000
BOB FINCH MEMORIAL FUND$10,000
VILAS FOOD PANTRY$10,000
ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY-IRONWOOD$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND$10,000
MATSU FOOD BANK$10,000
FRIENDS OF CHUGACH AVALANCHE CENTER$10,000
UNDERDOG PET RESCUE OF WISCONSIN$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOB FINCH MEMORIAL FUND: $10k → 13%BOB FINCH MEMORIAL FUND: $10k → 13%BOB FINCH MEMORIAL FUND: $10k → 13%BOB FINCH MEMORIAL FUND: $10k → 13%BOB FINCH MEMORIAL FUND: $10k → 13%BOB FINCH MEMORIAL FUND: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
CO
VA
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 30 repeat orgs$110k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
7

Total granted

$1.5M
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+46%

Still filing today

63%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthFood & NutritionAnimalsRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MISS HALL'S SCHOOL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $125k · revenue +18%
  • VF
    VILAS FOOD PANTRY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +78%
  • HA
    HATCHER ALPINE XPERIENCE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $75k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • CA
    CHUGACH AVALANCHE CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • AJ
    ALSACST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HO
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alaska Avalanche School Inc

The mission of the Alaska Avalanche School is to provide exceptional experience-based avalanche safety education to all users of the mountain environment.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Food Bank of Alaska

FBA believes no one deserves to be hungry. We are dedicated to eliminating hunger in Alaska by obtaining and providing food to partner agencies and through anti-hunger leadership.

Food & Nutrition
3
Alaska Zoo

To promote the conservation of arctic, sub-arctic and like-climate species through education, research and community enrichment. the zoo provides rehabilitation and shelter for injured and abandoned animals. the facility is open to the…

Animals
4
Blood Bank of Alaska Inc

The blood bank provides blood products and testing services to hospitals to ensure an adequate and safe supply of blood in routine and emergency situations. it provides educational services to potential donors and recipients of blood…

Health
5
Alaska Native Health Board

The mission of the alaska native health board is to promote the spiritual, physical, mental, social, and cultural well-being and pride of alaska native people.

—
6
Mat-Su 2024 Arctic Winter Games Hos

The mat-su arctic winter games are coming to alaska the mat-su arctic winter games host society was formed after the bid was awarded by the arctic winter games international committee to host the games in the region. the mat-su 2024 arctic…

—
7
Alaska Museum of Science and Nature

The alaska museum of science and nature is dedicated to the education and exploration of our scientific and natural world.

Youth Development
8
Alaska Wild Sheep Foundation

Enhance wild sheep populations, promote scientific wildlife management, educate the public on sheep and enhance sheep hunting and view opportunities in alaska.

Animals
9
Alaska Hospital & Healthcare Association

The Alaska Hospital & Healthcare Association (AHHA) is a non-profit trade association representing more than 65 hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, home health agencies, and other healthcare partners.Our members are distributed across…

—
10
Alaska Farmers Market Association

to promote, support and advocate for Alaska agriculture

Education
11
Alaska Rural Electric Cooperative Association Educational Foundation Inc
Environment
12
Valley Transit

Provide public transportation to the matanuska-susitna community.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Matanuska-Susitna Borough; the most unlike its peers is Figge Art Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YWCA: $140,000 · OtherYWCACRESTED BUTTE AVALANCHE CENTER: $135,000 · OtherCRESTED BUTTE AVALANCHE CENTERBEAN'S CAFE THE CHILDRENS LUNCHBOX: $115,800 · OtherBEAN'S CAFE THE CHILDRENS LUNCHBOXCURTIS MANSION FOUNDATION: $65,000 · OtherCURTIS MANSION FOUNDATIONST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY-IRONWOOD: $65,000 · OtherST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY-IRONWOODIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGATEWAY CONTEMPORARY BALLET: $35,000 · OtherHATCHER PASS AVALANCHE CENTER INC: $45,000 · Other+17 more: $252,000 · Other+17 moreMISS HALL'S SCHOOL INC: $125,000 · EducationMISS HALL'S SCHOOL …UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $95,000 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLEG…PAUL B SHARAR FOUNDATION - CLINTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $40,000 · EducationPAUL B SHARAR FOUND…THE BLUE RIDGE SCHOOL INC: $20,000 · EducationTHE BLUE RIDGE SCHO…VILAS FOOD PANTRY INC: $90,000 · Food & NutritionMat-Su Food Bank: $20,000 · Food & NutritionGUNNISON VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $61,000 · HealthDONOR ALLIANCE INC: $20,000 · HealthROCKY MOUNTAIN LIONS EYE BANK: $20,000 · HealthHATCHER ALPINE XPERIENCE: $75,000 · Recreation & SportsWasilla Youth Baseball: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsBOB FINCH MEMORIAL FUND: $60,000 · Human ServicesHUMANE SOCIETY OF VILAS COUNTY: $40,000 · AnimalsUNDERDOG PET RESCUE OF WISCONSIN INC: $20,000 · Animals
Other$912,800Education$280,000Food & Nutrition$110,000Health$101,000Recreation & Sports$80,000Human Services$60,000Animals$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMISS HALL'S SCHOOL INC: $125,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $95,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVILAS FOOD PANTRY INC: $90,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetHATCHER ALPINE XPERIENCE: $75,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetGUNNISON VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $61,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetBOB FINCH MEMORIAL FUND: $60,000 over 6y, 81% of budgetHATCHER PASS AVALANCHE CENTER INC: $45,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF VILAS COUNTY: $40,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetPAUL B SHARAR FOUNDATION - CLINTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $40,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetDONOR ALLIANCE INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNDERDOG PET RESCUE OF WISCONSIN INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMat-Su Food Bank: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetChallenge Alaska: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN LIONS EYE BANK: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BLUE RIDGE SCHOOL INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMAT-SU YOUTH HOUSING: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH: $17,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetAlaska Farmland Trust Corporation: $15,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetFIGGE ART MUSEUM: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWasilla Youth Baseball: $5,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MISS HALL'S SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds VILAS FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds HATCHER ALPINE XPERIENCE ↗
  • Who funds GUNNISON VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOB FINCH MEMORIAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds HATCHER PASS AVALANCHE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF VILAS COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds PAUL B SHARAR FOUNDATION - CLINTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DONOR ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNDERDOG PET RESCUE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Mat-Su Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds Challenge Alaska ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN LIONS EYE BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE BLUE RIDGE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds MAT-SU YOUTH HOUSING ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH ↗
  • Who funds Alaska Farmland Trust Corporation ↗
  • Who funds FIGGE ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds Wasilla Youth Baseball ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mta Foundation IncAK19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mta Foundation Inc · Valley Hospital Association Inc Dba Mat-Su Health Foundation · The Alaska Community Foundation · Rasmuson Foundation · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brad Sethness Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brad Sethness Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Brad Sethness Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Brad Sethness Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brad Sethness’ filings →

    More from the funding graph