Skip to content

· Private foundation

Boyle Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$56kFood & Nutrition$4kHuman Services$4kHealth$2kRecreation & Sports$2kEnvironment$1kPublic Benefit$620Education$450Other$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$460
Median grant
2
States reached
$56k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST ELIZABETH ANN SETON PARISH$8,030
ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST CHURCH$2,000
ARCHBISHOPS CATHOLIC APPEAL$700
FOOD BANK FOR LARIMER COUNTY$500
SERRA CLUB OF NORTHERN$460
Individual grant recipient$200
Individual grant recipient$100
ABBEY OF ST WALLBURGH$100
Individual grant recipient$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $980) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%PREBORN: $200 → 16%BOYS TOWN: $50 → 12%ADOPTION DREAM COME TRUE: $500 → 11%PATHWAYS HOSPICE: $30 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
NV
IA
IN
NJ
CT
CO
NE
AZ
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$63k · 18 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
33

Total granted

$63k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+15%

Still filing today

33%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $760 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    The Food Bank for Larimer County
    7× · 2017–2025 · $4k · revenue +45%
  • OB
    OUTDOOR BUDDIES INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $550 · revenue +87%
  • 4D
    40 DAYS FOR LIFE
    2× · 2017–2023 · $450 · revenue +297%

Funded once

  • OL
    OUR LADY OF PEACE
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • VH
    VETERANS HONORING VETERANS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $620
  • SC
    SERRA CLUB OF NORTHERN COLORADO
    one grant, 2021 · $600
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
A Caring Crisis Pregnancy Center of Northeast Colorado

The Organization was incorporated under the laws of the State of Colorado in 1999 for the purpose of providing support and alternative services for women and men who experience an unplanned pregnancy. As a faith based organization, the…

Health
2
Colorado Doula Project

The colorado doula project is a grassroots non-profit organization that provides free logistical, financial, and emotional support for people accessing abortion in colorado. a network of volunteer abortion doulas that can help you access…

Health
3
Alternatives Pregnancy Center Inc

Alternatives Pregnancy Center exists to care for Denver-area women and men in pregnancy-related crisis and offer them meaningful alternatives to abortion. We seek to meet emotional, physical, and spriritual needs, enabling and encouraging…

Health
4
Pueblo Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc

To empower women and families in the greater pueblo colorado area with the educational, emotional and spiritual resources they need to choose life and thrive.

Health
5
Colorado Christian Services

Colorado christian services comes alongside women in unplanned pregnancies and christian adoptive couples, in building families through caring, experienced and professional adoption planning services. in addition, our community resource…

Human Services
6
Dakota Hope Clinic

Dakota hope offers services that empower women and men to make choices about sexual health and pregnancy that will help them and their children to have a bright future. these services include pregnancy tests, ultrasound, and evidence-based…

Human Services
7
Power to Decide

Power to decide envisions a world where everyone - no matter who they are or where they live - has control over their bodies and can decide if, when, and under what circumstances to get pregnant and have a child. its mission is to advance…

Human Services
8
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
9
Adoption Options

Adoption options is a non-profit,colorado corporation, dedicated to providing the state of colorado with a range of private, non-secretarian child placement services.

Human Services
10
Colorado Pregnancy and Newborn Loss Services

To Improve the lives of all who have been affected by loss through miscarriage, stillbirth, and early infant death through education and grief support, and to ease anxiety for parents in subsequent pregnancy while providing professional…

Human Services
11
All-Options

All-options promotes unconditional, judgment-free support for the full spectrum of decisions and experiences with pregnancy, parenting, abortion and adoption. we know that these issues can be complicated, but one thing is certain: everyone…

Human Services
12
Life Choices Pregnancy Center Roberts

Life choices is a christ-centered preganacy medical center providing limited obstetrical ultrasounds, limited sexually transmitted infection testing, pregnancy tests, education, counseling, and restoration for sexual life choices.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST ELIZABETH ANN SETON PARISH: $46,440 · OtherST ELIZABETH ANN SETON PARISHST JOHN THE EVANGELIST CHURCH: $4,000 · OtherST JOHN THE EVANGELIST CHURCHARCHBISHOPS CATHOLIC APPEAL: $3,350 · Other+40 more: $11,433 · Other+40 moreThe Food Bank for Larimer County: $3,650 · Food & NutritionADOPTION DREAMS COME TRUE INC: $500 · Human ServicesMission Pre-Born Inc: $200 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $150 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 · Human Services+1 more: $30 · Human ServicesOUTDOOR BUDDIES INC: $550 · Recreation & Sports40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $450 · EducationCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $400 · HealthPARKINSON ASSOCIATION OF THE ROCKIES: $50 · HealthNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC: $200 · Housing & Shelter
Other$65,223Food & Nutrition$3,650Human Services$980Recreation & Sports$550Education$450Health$450Housing & Shelter$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Food Bank for Larimer County: $3,650 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetADOPTION DREAMS COME TRUE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS SAFEHOUSE INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMission Pre-Born Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBirthline of Loveland: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON ASSOCIATION OF THE ROCKIES: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATHWAYS HOSPICE: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Food Bank for Larimer County ↗
  • Who funds OUTDOOR BUDDIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ADOPTION DREAMS COME TRUE INC ↗
  • Who funds 40 DAYS FOR LIFE ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS SAFEHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Mission Pre-Born Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds Birthline of Loveland ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO20.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Colorado · Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATION · Daniels Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Boyle Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Boyle Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Boyle’s filings →

More from the funding graph