· Public charity
Boule Foundation
The foundation provides scholarships to undergraduate and graduate students and grants, donations and leadership development support to communities across the country.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 40 grants below total $1,383,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,811,700 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $428,200 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k28 grants · $620k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $750k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| International African American Museum | $100,000 |
| Jazz at Lincoln Center | $100,000 |
| NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund Inc | $100,000 |
| BVM Capacity Building Institute | $100,000 |
| The Memorial Foundation (MLK Monument) | $100,000 |
| National Pan-Hellenic Council | $50,000 |
| Flint Freedom Schools | $50,000 |
| Jackson Minton Scholarship Program | $50,000 |
| Ron Brown Scholar Fund | $50,000 |
| Base 11 | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $40,000 |
| Charles H Wright Museum | $40,000 |
| Talledega College | $40,000 |
| The History Makers | $40,000 |
| The Harlem School of the Arts Inc | $35,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against -5% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $929k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JAJAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +20%
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +132%- CFCenter for Innovations in Education2× · 2023–2024 · $150k · revenue +16% · 37% of their budget
Funded once
UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INCone grant, 2023 · $306k · revenue -56%- TJTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITYone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -5%
- SCSTEAM CODERSone grant, 2023 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mentorship of young Black men
The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…
Nonprofit membership association focused on educating and advancing Black MBAs and other Black members of the community
HBCU 20x20 is the worlds largest network for HBCU and Black job seekers. We relentlessly pursue opportunities for others because when we all work together any and everything is possible. Born from the idea that students at HBCU…
Focus on the total development of black male, high school-aged scholars with financial wealth-building at the core of our program.
To provide leadership and support for the national effort to increase the representation of successful african american, native american and latinx women and men in engineering and technology, math, and science-based careers.
Each year students have the opportunity to apply for the Walker-Williams-Wilson Memorial Scholarship dedicated to the memory of HBCU alumni who greatly impacted the spaces they graced The scholarship supports deserving Black male scholars…
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naacp Legal Defense & Educ Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is National Mentoring Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Center for Innovations in Education ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds THE HISTORYMAKERS ↗
- Who funds Durham Colored Library Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PAN HELLENIC COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds Ron Brown Scholar Fund ↗
- Who funds Talladega College ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds THE 431 EXCHANGE THE 431 EXCHANGE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MENTORING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HARLEM SCHOOL OF THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds CLIMB USA INC ↗
- Who funds GAMMA ZETA BOULE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BETA NU BOULE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR RESPONSIBLE CITIZENSHIP ↗
- Who funds KAPPA ALPHA PSI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds National Cares Mentoring Movement Inc ↗
- Who funds Diamond Youth Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Rockefeller Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Boule Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.