Skip to content
Booz Allen Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Booz Allen Foundation

EMPOWER PEOPLE TO USE TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION TO BREAK CYCLES OF STRUCTURAL INEQUITY AND BUILD GENERATIONAL RESILIENCE.

$740k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$2.0MPublic Safety & Disaster$753kEducation$681kYouth Development$310kEmployment$300kScience & Tech$165kHealth$140kHuman Services$85kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $165k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $575k
$50,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YEAR UP$100,000
ELEMENTARY INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE$75,000
Individual grant recipient$75,000
SLIDING DOORS STEM & DYSLEXIA LEARNING CENTER$75,000
MANA DE SAN DIEGO$50,000
ANACOSTIA COLLEGE TRACK$50,000
THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER WASHINGTON$50,000
ANACOSTIA ON-RAMPS TO CAREERS$50,000
GIRL SCOUT COUNCIL OF THE NATION'S CAPITAL$50,000
YMCA OF GREATER LOUISVILLE$35,000
STEM FOR HER FOUNDATION$35,000
EAST LAKE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$20,000
B-360 BALTIMORE INC$20,000
SOUL PROGRAM$20,000
ENVISION EXCELLENCE IN STEM EDUCATION$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MySecureKid Inc: $20k → 7%YMCA OF GREATER LOUISVILLE: $35k → 15%Young Mens Christian Assoc of Greater Louisville: $20k → 15%Beacon House Community Ministry Inc: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
IN
CT
CA
KY
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 15 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
30

Total granted

$3.3M
$845k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
+33%

Still filing today

93%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $290k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Feeding America
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2.0M · revenue +40%
  • MD
    MANA DE SAN DIEGO
    2× · 2022–2024 · $100k · revenue +151%
  • SP
    SAFE PASSAGES
    2× · 2020–2021 · $100k · revenue +309%

Funded once

  • University of Chicagograduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +52%
  • BL
    BECKY LEE WOMENS SUPPORT FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -14% · 53% of their budget
  • MO
    MASKS ON CORPORATION
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Girls in Stem
Human Services
2
Stem Advantage

Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…

Youth Development
3
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
4
National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering Inc

To provide leadership and support for the national effort to increase the representation of successful african american, native american and latinx women and men in engineering and technology, math, and science-based careers.

Civil Rights
5
Enterprise for Youth

Enterprise for youth empowers under-resourced san francisco youths to reach their potential through transformative paid internship experiences supported by a community of employers, caring adults, and peers.

Youth Development
6
Digital Girl Incorporated

Digital Girl, Inc. (DGI) is a non-profit organization dedicated to empowering the underserved youth of New York City, especially young girls, to pursue studies and careers in STEM ( Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) disciplines.

Education
7
Inroads Inc

To deliver innovative leadership development programs and creative solutions that identify, accelerate, and elevate underrepresented talent throughout their careers.

Education
8
The New York Opportunity Network Inc Dba the Opportunity Network

The opportunity network ignites the drive, curiosity, and agency of underrepresented students on their paths to and through college and into thriving careers, powered by our commitment to access and community.

Education
9
Florida Endowment Foundation for Florida's Graduates Inc

The organization's mission is to bring academic, work, life and economic opportunities to students whose potential to contribute to a robust florida is largely untapped.

Education
10
Equal Opportunity Schools

Equal opportunity schools' mission is to strengthen educator and system leader capacity to break down barriers to increase access, belonging, and success in rigorous college and career-prep secondary school courses for students of color…

Education
11
Girls Incorporated of Greater Indianapolis

Girls inc.'s mission is to inspire all girls to be strong, smart, and bold. in partnership with schools and community organizations, we focus on the development of the whole girl. she learns to value herself, take risks, and discover and…

Youth Development
12
Global Kids Inc

Global kids educates, inspires and mobilizes youth to become global citizens who are positively engaged in the world and are prepared for their future.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Year Up Inc; the most unlike its peers is Women in Cyber Security. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
19/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Feeding America: $2,000,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America+2 more: $18,304 · Food & NutritionTHE MINORITY PSYCHOLOGY NETWORK: $145,000 · OtherTHE MINORITY PSYCHOLOGY NETW…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE: $100,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREA…MASKS ON CORPORATION: $100,000 · OtherMASKS ON CORPORATIONTHE AI EDUCATION PROJECT: $80,000 · OtherTHE AI EDUCATION PROJECTCOLEMAN A YOUNG FOUNDATION: $80,000 · OtherCOLEMAN A YOUNG FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE INC: $50,000 · OtherANACOSTIA COLLEGE TRACK: $50,000 · OtherANACOSTIA ON-RAMPS TO CAREERS: $50,000 · Otherthe Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Louisville Inc: $55,000 · OtherNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $50,000 · OtherFULL STEAM FORWARD INC: $45,000 · Other+18 more: $270,000 · Other+18 moreYEAR UP INC: $250,000 · EducationYEAR UP INCTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTE…University of Chicago: $100,000 · EducationUniversity of Chica…MANA DE SAN DIEGO: $100,000 · EducationMANA DE SAN DIEGOSLIDING DOORS STEM & DYSLEXIA LEARNING CENTER: $95,000 · EducationSLIDING DOORS STEM …EASTLAKE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Education+5 more: $81,351 · Education+5 moreSTEM for Her Foundation: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentGirl Scout Council of the Nation's Capital: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS SAN DIEGO-IMPERIAL COUNCIL INC: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentB-360 Baltimore Inc: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAPITAL YOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM INC: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BAY COUNTY INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentBECKY LEE WOMENS SUPPORT FUND: $100,000 · PhilanthropyMET CARES FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyELEMENTARY INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE: $135,000 · Science & TechSAFE PASSAGES: $100,000 · Crime & Legal
Food & Nutrition$2,018,304Other$1,150,000Education$766,351Youth Development$195,000Philanthropy$150,000Science & Tech$135,000Crime & Legal$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFeeding America: $2,000,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYEAR UP INC: $250,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MINORITY PSYCHOLOGY NETWORK: $145,000 over 2y, 97% of budgetELEMENTARY INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE: $135,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE: $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBECKY LEE WOMENS SUPPORT FUND: $100,000 over 1y, 53% of budgetMANA DE SAN DIEGO: $100,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetSAFE PASSAGES: $100,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSLIDING DOORS STEM & DYSLEXIA LEARNING CENTER: $95,000 over 2y, 49% of budgetCOLEMAN A YOUNG FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetSTEM for Her Foundation: $60,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetthe Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Louisville Inc: $55,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGirl Scout Council of the Nation's Capital: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFULL STEAM FORWARD INC: $45,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetEASTLAKE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS SAN DIEGO-IMPERIAL COUNCIL INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetStudent-Athletes Organized to Under: $20,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetWomen In Cyber Security: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetB-360 Baltimore Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMYSECUREKID INC: $20,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetCAPITAL YOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $11,351 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEACON HOUSE COMMUNITY MINISTRY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BAY COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $6,304 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The California Wellne…The San Diego Foundat…Sempra FoundationSilicon Valley Commun…Charities Aid Foundat…The Blackbaud Giving …American Online Givin…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Pfizer Foundation…The Bank of America C…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…
The California Wellness FoundationCA14.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The California Wellness Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Booz Allen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Booz Allen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Year Up Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Booz Allen’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home